Analyzing the U.S.'s Four Largest Banks [View article]
Unless I'm looking at the numbers incorrectly, the Total Capital chart seems wrong if TC is Equity plus LTD. I can't tell what this means for the ROIC ratio shown. ??
Will This Economy Ever Create Job Growth? [View article]
The US consumer can't spend a lot more any time soon without releveraging. That can't happen, (unemployment, lower net assets, and tighter credit) and probably shouldn't in any event. The US economy can't rely on the US consumer being a growing 70% or more of the action, for a very long time. The consumer goods action needs to go where the global growth in spending is greatest - emerging markets anyone. There are savers aplenty, that want toys like ours, but they aren't in the tapped-out US. The US consumer binges are over for some time - perhaps a generation. So, whoever adapts to this well, and sooner than others, will win. Those who wait on the old normal to return will wait a long time. So, I like foresighted names with global views and inovative products or marketing capability - US based or others.
Paulson acted. The rest of the government, including the Fed was little more than a deer in the headlights. He did more than anyone else to avoid complete collapse. Was it perfect in hindsight? Of course not. Did it work better than any alternative that anyone else thought of at the time? Defintely. Sorry, but he stands out the hero of that time.
Dave's Top 10 Reasons This Recession Will Last Forever [View article]
We overconsumed for a long time on almost all private and public levels. Overconsumption (aside from moral and political BS) is simply not a productive use of capital. Our credibility (character, standing) is wrecked. Now we are going to pay for that wasted use of capital, and damamged global respect, for a long time and in many ways. The bailouts are temporary pacifiers, resulting from massive political denial. Future generations will be ashamed of our hubris and foolishness.
China and the U.S. Dollar: Nowhere to Run [View article]
Of course, the PRC and other trade-surplus countries will "spend" dollars as much as possible on other more inflation-friendly assets. But, the spent dollars themselves don't vanish. They simply deflate steadily over time relative to the goods purchased (especially if the goods are either durable and/or in limited supply).
If you sell gold (no matter who "you" are, or why you're doing it), you are buying a (probably your own) currency. "You" may be doing this as much to prop-up your currency as to negatively affect the price of gold. And "you" may be doing it because of a need rather than a desire. The "manipulation", if that's what it is, tells two stories, doesn't it. Besides, gold has been in a rletively flat pattern for some time. Nobody has moved it a lot, for long - yet. Would you rather have more currency of the purported sellers or the gold they are dumping?
Why Congress Is Asking Bernanke Bogus Questions [View article]
The only thing keeping BAC and their poor shareholders afloat was the government funding and guarantees. Otherwise they were gone, with or without Merrill. Lewis had slready broken BAC and given up his soul to the government. The government herded Merrill into a safe harbor, housing it in their ward, BAC. Lewis had nothing to say and no leg to stand on in the situation, which he created for himself by his prior decisions and governance.
Of course, Congress and White House are always, and only and all, about politics. It was pretty clear in Bernake's expressions what he would have liked to have responded to the idiots questioning him.
Nice analogy. I'm willing to guess that your mom: 1) paid cash or used very short-term credit for acquiring her old clothes, and 2) never thought for a moment that her selections were going to go up in value at any time folowing the pruchase. And, the net present value of her personal pleasure in wearing them was always greater than the original cost in current dollars..
Will Najarian's Prediction of a Stock Market Explosion Come True? [View article]
Remeber, accounting (like economics) is an extension of philosophy, not physics. Whether it attempts to represent earnings performance or asset value, accounting is nothing more than a highly complex and concocted opinion. M2M isn't per se a necessarily correct or particularly accutate method of denoting asset value. This is similar to the false hopes associated with the convolutions of Sarbanes Oxley, whcih has done little to improve the quality of earnings reports - other than to diminish them by the added expense of "compliance". There is nothing sacred about M2M. It may or may not be better than other methods of, or opinion of, asset valuation. What the stock market does tomorrow is even furhter removed from the hard sciences.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedAnalyzing the U.S.'s Four Largest Banks [View article]
Analyzing the U.S.'s Four Largest Banks [View article]
Will This Economy Ever Create Job Growth? [View article]
Was Paulson Right? [View article]
Cramer's Mad Money - Monsanto's Menacing Monopoly (8/13/09) [View article]
Dave's Top 10 Reasons This Recession Will Last Forever [View article]
Can the U.S. Economy Recover with No Growth in Bank Lending? [View article]
China and the U.S. Dollar: Nowhere to Run [View article]
13 Agriculture Myths Busted: This Bubble Is Ready to Pop [View article]
Gold Price Manipulation: So What? [View article]
Why Congress Is Asking Bernanke Bogus Questions [View article]
Of course, Congress and White House are always, and only and all, about politics. It was pretty clear in Bernake's expressions what he would have liked to have responded to the idiots questioning him.
What to Do About Mark to Market? [View article]
Housing Decline Slowing? Wishful Thinking (Case-Shiller) [View article]
Corn Inflation and the Specter of Unintended Consequences [View article]
Will Najarian's Prediction of a Stock Market Explosion Come True? [View article]