<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>thannagan's Comments</title>
    <description>thannagan's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/93792/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Bank Lending: Helping The Recovery?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1326691/comments?source=feed#comment-17411861</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17411861</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[A larger-than-ever portion of home buying is by hedge funds - who don't use bank lending. S&amp;P 500 firms are going to the bond market for longer-term credit at now low rates - avoiding shorter-term bank borrowing. And, its a painfully slow growth economy. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 14:27:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[A larger-than-ever portion of home buying is by hedge funds - who don't use bank lending. S&amp;P 500 firms are going to the bond market for longer-term credit at now low rates - avoiding shorter-term bank borrowing. And, its a painfully slow growth economy. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>P/E Ratio: The Distorted Valuation That Tells Us Something</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1326761/comments?source=feed#comment-17409931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17409931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Good stuff. Still looking at it to see what it might mean. Thanks]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:50:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Good stuff. Still looking at it to see what it might mean. Thanks]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tim Cook responds to criticism of Apple's (AAPL -1.6%) Chinese repair/warranty policy by state-owned media outlets and a government agency by issuing an apology letter that outlines repair policy changes for the iPhone 4 and 4S. Separately, Fidelity Contrafund, Apple's biggest active shareholder, discloses it cut its stake in the company by 10% in January and February, to 10.4M shares.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/918141?source=feed#comment-17086391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17086391</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[So, of course, TC is not SJ. Who would be? Half the comments dislike TC because he isn't publicly defending or selling the AAPL story enough and not &quot;caring&quot; about the &quot;shareholders&quot;. That actually sounds very SJ-like to me. Not kowtowing to WS, the investing &quot;public&quot; (or anyone else) was high art form with SJ. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 16:38:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[So, of course, TC is not SJ. Who would be? Half the comments dislike TC because he isn't publicly defending or selling the AAPL story enough and not &quot;caring&quot; about the &quot;shareholders&quot;. That actually sounds very SJ-like to me. Not kowtowing to WS, the investing &quot;public&quot; (or anyone else) was high art form with SJ. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thoughts On Current Stock Market Valuation (Continued)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1307541/comments?source=feed#comment-17014661</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17014661</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It seems to me that with all of the agreement on the level of distortion that QE has caused for bonds, resulting in abnormally low rates, the same is true for abnormally inflated bond prices. So, bonds (considering both artificial price support and $$ market size) seem to be much more of a relative risk than stock price levels. Where am I wrong with this stance?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 12:50:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It seems to me that with all of the agreement on the level of distortion that QE has caused for bonds, resulting in abnormally low rates, the same is true for abnormally inflated bond prices. So, bonds (considering both artificial price support and $$ market size) seem to be much more of a relative risk than stock price levels. Where am I wrong with this stance?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All 10 Sectors Overbought</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1276621/comments?source=feed#comment-16373281</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16373281</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[So, if overbought means a positive deviation from an average range, the more/longer a stock is &quot;overbought&quot;, pulling up its average along the way, the less &quot;overbought&quot; it becomes, statistically speaking. This may of course have nothing to do with its price tomorrow. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 13:39:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[So, if overbought means a positive deviation from an average range, the more/longer a stock is &quot;overbought&quot;, pulling up its average along the way, the less &quot;overbought&quot; it becomes, statistically speaking. This may of course have nothing to do with its price tomorrow. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Major Asset Classes - January 2013 Performance Review</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1150151/comments?source=feed#comment-14484321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14484321</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Helphul summary. Thanks]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 11:58:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Helphul summary. Thanks]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Investment Rate Warns Of A Major Market Turn Down</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1143541/comments?source=feed#comment-14364181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14364181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/VWUewm'>http://bit.ly/VWUewm</a><br/><br/>Not a fan of articles pointing/teasing to things I have to buy or join. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:53:10 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/VWUewm'>http://bit.ly/VWUewm</a><br/><br/>Not a fan of articles pointing/teasing to things I have to buy or join. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple 2013 Price Hedging By Market-Makers, Protecting Their Long And Short Exposure Risks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1124331/comments?source=feed#comment-14007561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14007561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I would re-read the last paragraph.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:22:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I would re-read the last paragraph.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Fed Vs. The World</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1121351/comments?source=feed#comment-13915651</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13915651</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;as markets were now at their highest levels since December 2007. This is quite an accomplishment, and just shows what printer's ink can do.&quot;<br/><br/>Earnings of the markets should get some credit for the price recovery, shouldn't they?<br/><br/>Thanks]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 12:25:22 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;as markets were now at their highest levels since December 2007. This is quite an accomplishment, and just shows what printer's ink can do.&quot;<br/><br/>Earnings of the markets should get some credit for the price recovery, shouldn't they?<br/><br/>Thanks]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Paul Krugman's Call For Re-Thinking The Debt And Deficit Crisis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1029601/comments?source=feed#comment-11997691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11997691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The federal debt isn't going to be paid off, ever, in currency or anything else. It isn't in anyone's best interest (sorry) to pay it off, ever. The USD is already priced by the market, relative to other currencies and commodities, to reflect the quantity of existing USD currency plus it's debt. Krugman is partly correct, but then simply a theorist. He would do well to reflect briefly on Econ 101 Supply/Demand principle. AE83 is correct regarding the relationship of wages and inflation. Inflation is a flat tax on all spent income.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:42:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The federal debt isn't going to be paid off, ever, in currency or anything else. It isn't in anyone's best interest (sorry) to pay it off, ever. The USD is already priced by the market, relative to other currencies and commodities, to reflect the quantity of existing USD currency plus it's debt. Krugman is partly correct, but then simply a theorist. He would do well to reflect briefly on Econ 101 Supply/Demand principle. AE83 is correct regarding the relationship of wages and inflation. Inflation is a flat tax on all spent income.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gold, Iowa Farmland, And The Dow - What The Past 60 Years Can Tell Us About The Future</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/998471/comments?source=feed#comment-11511811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11511811</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It looks like Gold/Farmland bubbled around 1980, as did inflation. Stocks lagged thru this bubble as the inflation was stagflation. This bubble burst with the application of ultra-high interest rates. Then stocks bubbled and burst twice (first with the dot com then housing), while gold and farms grew more slowly. But, all three have now ended up about together. So, we are roughly back to 1990-like equilibrium conditions, except that yes the population has grown, wealth has increased some, rates are now at historic lows and liquidity is being pumped into the system. That all three are together tells me that none is in a bubble situation relative to the others. No near-term rise in rates supports gold short-term. Continued global population growth and/or wealth supports farmland. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:50:40 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It looks like Gold/Farmland bubbled around 1980, as did inflation. Stocks lagged thru this bubble as the inflation was stagflation. This bubble burst with the application of ultra-high interest rates. Then stocks bubbled and burst twice (first with the dot com then housing), while gold and farms grew more slowly. But, all three have now ended up about together. So, we are roughly back to 1990-like equilibrium conditions, except that yes the population has grown, wealth has increased some, rates are now at historic lows and liquidity is being pumped into the system. That all three are together tells me that none is in a bubble situation relative to the others. No near-term rise in rates supports gold short-term. Continued global population growth and/or wealth supports farmland. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Compromise Seems Futile As Cliff Nears</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/997041/comments?source=feed#comment-11457951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11457951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[No one &quot;runs&quot; the spook house - certainly not the WH. But they date when convenient.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 13:36:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[No one &quot;runs&quot; the spook house - certainly not the WH. But they date when convenient.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bernanke Gets A Thank You Card, Faber Buys A Tank, And UBS Thinks The Unthinkable</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/992581/comments?source=feed#comment-11423451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11423451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[More tanks in private hands should be bullish for oil/steal. Their city/highway MPG must be very poor.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 12:26:25 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[More tanks in private hands should be bullish for oil/steal. Their city/highway MPG must be very poor.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple Is Ripening And So Is Its Stock</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/974651/comments?source=feed#comment-11187481</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11187481</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Follow the money, stupid. Someone is making a profit on selling and selling, and/or, they intend to then profit on buying and buying. This will repeat itself (as it has happened before). So where are the majority of the outstanding shares. They aren't in my account or the accounts of most SA authors and repliers. The game isn't controlled, or even affected, by odd-lot traders.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 23:02:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Follow the money, stupid. Someone is making a profit on selling and selling, and/or, they intend to then profit on buying and buying. This will repeat itself (as it has happened before). So where are the majority of the outstanding shares. They aren't in my account or the accounts of most SA authors and repliers. The game isn't controlled, or even affected, by odd-lot traders.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Apple's Numbers Tell Us Not To Worry</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/973031/comments?source=feed#comment-11175641</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11175641</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I like it (am buying) at under 10 X fill-in-the-blank. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:47:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I like it (am buying) at under 10 X fill-in-the-blank. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thompson Creek Metals (TC -5.2%) says it is suspending stripping activity associated with the next phase of production at the Thompson Creek Mine; TC expects to save ~$100M in operating costs and $8M-$9M in capital expenditures, as well as  reduce the mine workforce by ~100 workers.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/568541?source=feed#comment-10115561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10115561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[MAy know more on Thursday call (see article).]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 10:41:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[MAy know more on Thursday call (see article).]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>James Bullard On Why Fed's Policy Is Flawed</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/864711/comments?source=feed#comment-9454091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9454091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Leverage, when you can't even afford the P&amp;I payments, was stupid short-term thinking (a bubble) that blew up. Being totally deleveraged in this near-zero rate environment is not smart - if you can afford the P&amp;I payments. Paying off the mortgage is not necessarily the best wealth management idea.<br/><br/>More or less &quot;forcing&quot; riskier investments (say for total return enhancement) may enhance the velocity of money back towards normal levels, and that in turn may boost consumer and business economic activity.<br/><br/>The Fed, with its huge and growing book, has more firepower than ever before to fight US inflation, if and when it emerges. The costs of specific services, like medicine and education, are not in the Fed's purview. Overall, costs are now a global consideration - and capacity utilization is low.<br/><br/>Time will tell whether the QE's worked well, but I like someone in power setting a clear direction and taking action. I'd like more grown-ups in DC, but not sure the system will produce that any time soon.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:55:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Leverage, when you can't even afford the P&amp;I payments, was stupid short-term thinking (a bubble) that blew up. Being totally deleveraged in this near-zero rate environment is not smart - if you can afford the P&amp;I payments. Paying off the mortgage is not necessarily the best wealth management idea.<br/><br/>More or less &quot;forcing&quot; riskier investments (say for total return enhancement) may enhance the velocity of money back towards normal levels, and that in turn may boost consumer and business economic activity.<br/><br/>The Fed, with its huge and growing book, has more firepower than ever before to fight US inflation, if and when it emerges. The costs of specific services, like medicine and education, are not in the Fed's purview. Overall, costs are now a global consideration - and capacity utilization is low.<br/><br/>Time will tell whether the QE's worked well, but I like someone in power setting a clear direction and taking action. I'd like more grown-ups in DC, but not sure the system will produce that any time soon.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Fed Stimulates Inflation Expectations</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/866331/comments?source=feed#comment-9452501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9452501</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Doesn't the (greatly) increased size of the Fed's holdings of securities provide them with tremendously more firepower to use to fight too much inflation if and when they need to take liquidity out of the system? That ability alone may help to keep inflation expectations restrained.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:27:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Doesn't the (greatly) increased size of the Fed's holdings of securities provide them with tremendously more firepower to use to fight too much inflation if and when they need to take liquidity out of the system? That ability alone may help to keep inflation expectations restrained.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Message Of TIPS: Extremely Weak Growth Ahead</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/742031/comments?source=feed#comment-7696021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7696021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[With 10YT where its at, is the market's extreme pessimism (safety at any price) fully priced into other/all assets, yet? It seems RE/housing may have bottomed. Any non-doomsdayer would be considered optimistic by comparison. But how to profit - and when? Hmmm.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:41:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[With 10YT where its at, is the market's extreme pessimism (safety at any price) fully priced into other/all assets, yet? It seems RE/housing may have bottomed. Any non-doomsdayer would be considered optimistic by comparison. But how to profit - and when? Hmmm.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>U.S. Recession Cloaked By European Distraction; Stop Ignoring The Signals</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/687131/comments?source=feed#comment-6886751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6886751</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'll take US &quot;unemployment&quot; compared to most (if not all) other countries. Yes, the recovery is very slow, but the economy is NOT slowing. Its growing slowly, in spite of global drag. Even if you are in cash, you are invested somewhere. US is best bet at this time, IMO. I also feel US corporate leadership (although not always perfect) is the best in the world.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:44:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'll take US &quot;unemployment&quot; compared to most (if not all) other countries. Yes, the recovery is very slow, but the economy is NOT slowing. Its growing slowly, in spite of global drag. Even if you are in cash, you are invested somewhere. US is best bet at this time, IMO. I also feel US corporate leadership (although not always perfect) is the best in the world.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Europe And The Equity Dilemma</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/688781/comments?source=feed#comment-6885911</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6885911</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The sovereigns and their banks are joined at the hip (and heart and mind). Just look at the balance sheets, with their sovereign holdings. This is true everywhere, but especially in Europe. And its been the case for centuries.<br/><br/>Now, imagine that the states located in the US were &quot;countries&quot;. Each of our governors (with their egos intact) were elevated to presidents. The dollar is the common currency. The banks are regulated by their home states. The federal debt is divided amongst the states (since the US doesn't exist). The federal income tax is divided amongst the states, as well. A very few states are solvent. Most are not, they're getting worse by the day. And we need them to come to an agreement on a federal solution to the crises.<br/><br/>Would the wisdom and forbearance of our founding fathers come to the surface, in time, or at all? ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:31:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The sovereigns and their banks are joined at the hip (and heart and mind). Just look at the balance sheets, with their sovereign holdings. This is true everywhere, but especially in Europe. And its been the case for centuries.<br/><br/>Now, imagine that the states located in the US were &quot;countries&quot;. Each of our governors (with their egos intact) were elevated to presidents. The dollar is the common currency. The banks are regulated by their home states. The federal debt is divided amongst the states (since the US doesn't exist). The federal income tax is divided amongst the states, as well. A very few states are solvent. Most are not, they're getting worse by the day. And we need them to come to an agreement on a federal solution to the crises.<br/><br/>Would the wisdom and forbearance of our founding fathers come to the surface, in time, or at all? ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wednesday: Waiting For Europe To Do Something Or Nothing</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/687191/comments?source=feed#comment-6884611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6884611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Really silly stuff. (Should have allowed all major US banks to fail at once, Lehman times 6, or a lot more. Very simplistic and dangerous thinking.) Ridiculous thinking. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:06:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Really silly stuff. (Should have allowed all major US banks to fail at once, Lehman times 6, or a lot more. Very simplistic and dangerous thinking.) Ridiculous thinking. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The St. Louis Stress Index Rises For A Third Week</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/634981/comments?source=feed#comment-6136851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6136851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This move seems rather insignificant, based on the scale of index. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 15:46:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This move seems rather insignificant, based on the scale of index. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Small Banks Unlikely To Be Able To Repay TARP Funds</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/562421/comments?source=feed#comment-5182251</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5182251</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[How much of the outstanding TARP $$'s are with banks (of any size) versus non-banks (insurance/autos/other)? ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 12:15:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How much of the outstanding TARP $$'s are with banks (of any size) versus non-banks (insurance/autos/other)? ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Despite New Optimism, Housing Gains Not A Sure Bet</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/505711/comments?source=feed#comment-4549941</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4549941</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Housing prices aren't going up anytime soon, due in large part to the federally required appraisal rules, that guarantee low financing values based on all the other recent distressed sales. Its a self-fulfilling low home price rule - even if and when buyers would be willing to pay more. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:27:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Housing prices aren't going up anytime soon, due in large part to the federally required appraisal rules, that guarantee low financing values based on all the other recent distressed sales. Its a self-fulfilling low home price rule - even if and when buyers would be willing to pay more. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thompson Creek Missteps Frustrating; But Value Remains</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/478191/comments?source=feed#comment-4138411</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4138411</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks. Best full-story on TC to-date. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:51:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks. Best full-story on TC to-date. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rare Earth Metals: A Stock Picker's Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/400221/comments?source=feed#comment-3027021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3027021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Great coverage of the topic. Is Thompson Creek (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tc' title='Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc.'>TC</a>) a consideration here? Thought they competed with MCP. Thanks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:54:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Great coverage of the topic. Is Thompson Creek (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tc' title='Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc.'>TC</a>) a consideration here? Thought they competed with MCP. Thanks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Focus On Stocks, Not The Stock Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/375471/comments?source=feed#comment-2749791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2749791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks. The article helps to distinguish stock types. I'm trying to be about 50% in defensive/long-term and 50% cyclical/cash. TH]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:03:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks. The article helps to distinguish stock types. I'm trying to be about 50% in defensive/long-term and 50% cyclical/cash. TH]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How To Make Money: Stick To The Market-Friendly Test</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/315872/comments?source=feed#comment-2131192</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2131192</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Good stuff. To the extent that &quot;market friendly&quot; is largely a quick rush of some kind of stimulant and that the m/f stimulant doesn't have an intermediate (let alone long-term) payment plan, isn't this actually an increase in embeded downside risk. I would think one would need to be at least as nimble on his/her exit plan. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:40:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Good stuff. To the extent that &quot;market friendly&quot; is largely a quick rush of some kind of stimulant and that the m/f stimulant doesn't have an intermediate (let alone long-term) payment plan, isn't this actually an increase in embeded downside risk. I would think one would need to be at least as nimble on his/her exit plan. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bank Of America: There's No Worse Bet Right Now</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/311213/comments?source=feed#comment-2078425</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2078425</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I tend to like the discount to Warren's warrants. He's done pretty well.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 12:46:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I tend to like the discount to Warren's warrants. He's done pretty well.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
