<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Ocean Man's Comments</title>
    <description>Ocean Man's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/953225/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>American Capital: A Unique BDC With No Dividend And A Large Buyback Program</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1487162/comments?source=feed#comment-19755542</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19755542</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Excellent article, Albert. My feeling has been that ACAS should fall a bit with AGNC, but more like 1/4 to 1/6 of the AGNC drop, so unless interest rates rising causes a problem, the drop is likely overdone. From a long-term hold perspective, you can find a silver lining in the drop, as the company is buying back at $13 per share instead of $15 per share.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 21:21:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Excellent article, Albert. My feeling has been that ACAS should fall a bit with AGNC, but more like 1/4 to 1/6 of the AGNC drop, so unless interest rates rising causes a problem, the drop is likely overdone. From a long-term hold perspective, you can find a silver lining in the drop, as the company is buying back at $13 per share instead of $15 per share.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Factset's Buyback Quarterly is a must-read for followers of corporate share repurchases. In Q4, buybacks rose 9.6% even as markets posted record highs, leaving Mike Shedlock to wonder: "Is this yet another case of 'here we go again'?"</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1047321?source=feed#comment-19305871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19305871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The S&amp;P was never even within 100 points of record highs in Q4, and was 200 points (13%) off of record highs in the middle of Q4. Everything we've seen since indicates companies were quite brilliant to have been buying in Q4.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 21:31:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The S&amp;P was never even within 100 points of record highs in Q4, and was 200 points (13%) off of record highs in the middle of Q4. Everything we've seen since indicates companies were quite brilliant to have been buying in Q4.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>With Plenty Of Cash, Hydrogenics Is A Buy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1383641/comments?source=feed#comment-18263361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18263361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Expected to close by May 3rd.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 08:52:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Expected to close by May 3rd.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A very bullish presentation from Longboard Asset Management helped Tesla (TSLA +7.4%) rally today. Calling Tesla the auto industry version of Apple (others have made that analogy in some form) due to its brand, management, and disruptive impact (among other things), Longboard predicts shares will hit $100 within 18 months and $200 within 5 years. The firm expects Tesla to grab 80% of the global EV market, praises the company's engineering skill, and expects a heavy short interest (44% of the free float is shorted) to help fuel a rally. (slides) Update: SA commenters report having seen Longboard's presentation earlier. However, it was only today that it received media coverage.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/979381?source=feed#comment-18244391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18244391</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm pretty sure Apple doesn't have negative earnings.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:52:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm pretty sure Apple doesn't have negative earnings.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Magnum Hunter's $401 Million Eagle Ford Sales To Penn Virginia Helps Both Companies' Growth Plans</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1318581/comments?source=feed#comment-17190841</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17190841</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Why would you think that MHR is selling at a discount?  The author points out above that MHR sold at a price that was more than 2x what Sanchez just paid for their recent Eagle Ford acquisition, per BOEPD.<br/><br/>Do you know what MHR bought this acreage for? $2M. Yes, two million dollars. Three years ago. Since then they've spent $263M developing the acreage and have pulled out $80M in net cash flow.<br/><br/>I call that a nice return on investment.<br/><br/>This also confirms what a steal SN pulled off in their deal. Long both.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 19:29:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Why would you think that MHR is selling at a discount?  The author points out above that MHR sold at a price that was more than 2x what Sanchez just paid for their recent Eagle Ford acquisition, per BOEPD.<br/><br/>Do you know what MHR bought this acreage for? $2M. Yes, two million dollars. Three years ago. Since then they've spent $263M developing the acreage and have pulled out $80M in net cash flow.<br/><br/>I call that a nice return on investment.<br/><br/>This also confirms what a steal SN pulled off in their deal. Long both.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Texas Hold ‘Em Tournaments And Value Investing</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/957061-chris-demuth-jr/1709031-texas-hold-em-tournaments-and-value-investing?source=feed#comment-17096451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17096451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[That would take a long time to expand on, but the short answer is that Sklansky is an actuary turned poker player, whereas a lot of the others are poker players trying to explain complex probabilities.<br/><br/>One example is that Helmuth ranks small pocket pairs far higher than math would suggest, but he makes them work for non-math reasons. First off, they're binary - if you don't flop your set, you're out, and if you do flop your set, they're relatively simple to play, so you cut down on the mistakes you make with those hands. Second, when the flop comes K-9-4 and you show aggression, most opponents put you on a pair of Kings rather than a set of 4s, so there's very often a stealth factor to your true strength.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 22:24:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[That would take a long time to expand on, but the short answer is that Sklansky is an actuary turned poker player, whereas a lot of the others are poker players trying to explain complex probabilities.<br/><br/>One example is that Helmuth ranks small pocket pairs far higher than math would suggest, but he makes them work for non-math reasons. First off, they're binary - if you don't flop your set, you're out, and if you do flop your set, they're relatively simple to play, so you cut down on the mistakes you make with those hands. Second, when the flop comes K-9-4 and you show aggression, most opponents put you on a pair of Kings rather than a set of 4s, so there's very often a stealth factor to your true strength.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Texas Hold ‘Em Tournaments And Value Investing</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/957061-chris-demuth-jr/1709031-texas-hold-em-tournaments-and-value-investing?source=feed#comment-17083561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17083561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It's a bit unbelievable to me how many books on poker use flawed math, ranging from minor / insignificant to major / contradictory. It's also funny that the authors who do get the math exactly right are not in the top tier of players in the professional world. Only Sklansky and Malmuth have the math right. However, even the books that have the math the furthest off, like Helmuth, have a lot of useful advice outside of the math.<br/><br/>Your article is terrific, and I have found a few other similarities between investing and poker in my experience. First, alongside Expected Value is always variance. An out-of-the-money call option and a utility stock could have the same EV, but you might have a 60%+ chance of losing your entire investment on the former. I liken Hold Em tournaments and no-limit games to high-beta investment choices, and 20-hour grinds in a limit ring game to low-beta investment choices. <br/><br/>Second, the bad beats are very similar in the two. In both, you find yourself in situations where you should have won, only to find something very unlikely happened at the worst possible time. It's a tough feeling to live with, because there are no offsetting situations where you should have lost and got lucky to win, because in both poker and investing, if you've identified a negative EV situation, you've exited.<br/><br/>Third, I find a strong similarity between being up big on a stock and realizing you've got the nuts. The strategy of maximizing that big win contains the same exhilaration and considerations in both arenas.<br/><br/>I'm sure there are more....]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:39:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It's a bit unbelievable to me how many books on poker use flawed math, ranging from minor / insignificant to major / contradictory. It's also funny that the authors who do get the math exactly right are not in the top tier of players in the professional world. Only Sklansky and Malmuth have the math right. However, even the books that have the math the furthest off, like Helmuth, have a lot of useful advice outside of the math.<br/><br/>Your article is terrific, and I have found a few other similarities between investing and poker in my experience. First, alongside Expected Value is always variance. An out-of-the-money call option and a utility stock could have the same EV, but you might have a 60%+ chance of losing your entire investment on the former. I liken Hold Em tournaments and no-limit games to high-beta investment choices, and 20-hour grinds in a limit ring game to low-beta investment choices. <br/><br/>Second, the bad beats are very similar in the two. In both, you find yourself in situations where you should have won, only to find something very unlikely happened at the worst possible time. It's a tough feeling to live with, because there are no offsetting situations where you should have lost and got lucky to win, because in both poker and investing, if you've identified a negative EV situation, you've exited.<br/><br/>Third, I find a strong similarity between being up big on a stock and realizing you've got the nuts. The strategy of maximizing that big win contains the same exhilaration and considerations in both arenas.<br/><br/>I'm sure there are more....]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>March Madness Trading Challenge</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/792422-brad-kenagy/1566811-march-madness-trading-challenge?source=feed#comment-16712251</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16712251</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Nice comeback Ghosts!  I was winning by 1.5% with less than an hour to play - wow. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 19:17:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nice comeback Ghosts!  I was winning by 1.5% with less than an hour to play - wow. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>March Madness Trading Challenge</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/792422-brad-kenagy/1566811-march-madness-trading-challenge?source=feed#comment-16364121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16364121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[PGH went up 9% in one week and LOST!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 09:48:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[PGH went up 9% in one week and LOST!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>March Madness Trading Challenge</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/792422-brad-kenagy/1566811-march-madness-trading-challenge?source=feed#comment-16354841</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16354841</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[14 double-digit seeds advanced!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:52:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[14 double-digit seeds advanced!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>March Madness Trading Challenge</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/792422-brad-kenagy/1566811-march-madness-trading-challenge?source=feed#comment-16244661</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16244661</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Realornot has got to be the best 15-seed in the history of the tournament!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:47:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Realornot has got to be the best 15-seed in the history of the tournament!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ellington Financial (EFC) reports estimated book value of $24.52/share on Feb. 28. This is down from $25.69 at the end of January, but the company paid out $1.52 in dividends during the period. The stock price is $24.90, putting the shares at a premium to book for the first time in recent memory. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/876611?source=feed#comment-16024691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16024691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It was trading at a premium to book for the last two weeks of February prior to the dividend.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 08:35:12 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It was trading at a premium to book for the last two weeks of February prior to the dividend.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>March Madness Trading Challenge</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/792422-brad-kenagy/1566811-march-madness-trading-challenge?source=feed#comment-15566071</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15566071</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Long SN.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:42:22 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Long SN.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Exelon Cuts Dividend, Market Yawns</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1199691/comments?source=feed#comment-15149091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15149091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Exelon's yield will be up over 4.5% soon, and it won't be from raising the dividend. Short.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:49:12 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Exelon's yield will be up over 4.5% soon, and it won't be from raising the dividend. Short.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>QR Energy Offers An 11.1% Yield, Backed By Hedges</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1199671/comments?source=feed#comment-15148701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15148701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Great article, Albert, particularly the comparison of QRE's hedges vs. their peers.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:39:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Great article, Albert, particularly the comparison of QRE's hedges vs. their peers.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Market Notes: Drilling For Profit In Oil Servicers -- February 14</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/306707-dr-kris/1553361-market-notes-drilling-for-profit-in-oil-servicers-february-14?source=feed#comment-15019671</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15019671</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[That's funny, I just posted earlier this evening about CJES hitting a new high. That's my favorite in the sector, followed by HP and BAS. I consider them all pretty dangerous though. They can drop by large amounts fast, and this recent rally happened in the face of bad news, misses, warnings, etc.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 21:49:56 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[That's funny, I just posted earlier this evening about CJES hitting a new high. That's my favorite in the sector, followed by HP and BAS. I consider them all pretty dangerous though. They can drop by large amounts fast, and this recent rally happened in the face of bad news, misses, warnings, etc.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ellington Financial (EFC) declares a Q4 dividend of $0.77/share and a special dividend for FY2012 of $0.75. The regular dividend is a 10% bump from the previous payout. Kudos go to SA Pro author Thomas Lott who in mid-December highlighted this underfollowed partnership as an alternative investment&amp;nbsp;idea for mREIT fans. Shares +3.5% AH. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/822941?source=feed#comment-14911501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14911501</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Someone in Stocktalks has been highlighting $EFC over and over for a couple of years.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:07:23 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Someone in Stocktalks has been highlighting $EFC over and over for a couple of years.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dear growth investors: Earnings growth is getting hard to find and is increasingly concentrated to fewer big firms (last year: financials). If Fed help is less effective, where to find growth in 2013? Sectors that might see better sales-boosting chances: consumer discretionary (on rising consumer optimism), and those that get their revenues from China and emerging economies, like GM and industrials, as well as those based in emerging markets.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/747171?source=feed#comment-13358691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13358691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Here are three ways to find growth:<br/><br/>1) The absolute hottest brands on the planet. I maintain that the best plays on this idea are KORS and APP.<br/><br/>2) Oil juniors with triple-digit projected growth. My top pick of these is SN, with 377% projected growth for 2013 and no debt.<br/><br/>3) Manufactured EPS growth, due to a large buyback program. My favorites here are PNRA and DPS, but there are lots of others.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 10:06:20 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Here are three ways to find growth:<br/><br/>1) The absolute hottest brands on the planet. I maintain that the best plays on this idea are KORS and APP.<br/><br/>2) Oil juniors with triple-digit projected growth. My top pick of these is SN, with 377% projected growth for 2013 and no debt.<br/><br/>3) Manufactured EPS growth, due to a large buyback program. My favorites here are PNRA and DPS, but there are lots of others.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Seeking Alpha Trading Survivor Contest</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/792422-brad-kenagy/1364131-seeking-alpha-trading-survivor-contest?source=feed#comment-13203521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13203521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I don't really care which way this contest does it, but I find it interesting you'd assume, much less be certain, it's measured from the open on the 2nd. When they say &quot;the S&amp;P is up 4% on the year&quot; they're measuring from the 12/31 close as far as I know, not from the 1/2 open.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 23:31:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I don't really care which way this contest does it, but I find it interesting you'd assume, much less be certain, it's measured from the open on the 2nd. When they say &quot;the S&amp;P is up 4% on the year&quot; they're measuring from the 12/31 close as far as I know, not from the 1/2 open.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Seeking Alpha Trading Survivor Contest</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/792422-brad-kenagy/1364131-seeking-alpha-trading-survivor-contest?source=feed#comment-13198521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13198521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Is the starting point Monday's closing price?  Some guy said he was hoping for a gap down open to give him a better starting point in your contest.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 20:01:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Is the starting point Monday's closing price?  Some guy said he was hoping for a gap down open to give him a better starting point in your contest.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Seeking Alpha Trading Survivor Contest</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/792422-brad-kenagy/1364131-seeking-alpha-trading-survivor-contest?source=feed#comment-13006001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13006001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Long WTW.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:00:56 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Long WTW.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Midday top 10 gainers: MEMS +72%. NLP +38%. ARCI +20%. INFI +14%. VVUS +14%. NCTY +13%. SKX +12%. SQNM +11%. PSUN +11%. MTSL +11%.  Midday top 10 Losers: STV -46%. ZLC -29%. CNET -18%. SCHL -18%. TLYS -17%. STJ -14%. CLNT -13%. EBR -11%. HGSH -11%. KID -11%.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/679531?source=feed#comment-11857961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11857961</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hey guys at Market Currents, $STV isn't down today, it paid a big special dividend, something like $2.30 on a $4 stock.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:04:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hey guys at Market Currents, $STV isn't down today, it paid a big special dividend, something like $2.30 on a $4 stock.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Matador Resources: Taming The Bull That Is Eagle Ford Shale</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/980891/comments?source=feed#comment-11298121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11298121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Good article, Clayton. I especially like the map showing the relative locations of the various Eagle Ford players.  MTDR is a great pick for the reasons you mentioned and has an attractive entry price right now.  Another one that would compare favorably to your metrics is Sanchez SN.<br/><br/>A couple other advantages of Eagle Ford over the Bakken are transportation costs due to proximity to the Gulf, and average drilling costs. Due to rocky ground vs. soft earth and depth needed to get to the oil, Bakken wells can average $9M each to drill while some in the Eagle Ford can be drilled closer to $6M.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 15:58:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Good article, Clayton. I especially like the map showing the relative locations of the various Eagle Ford players.  MTDR is a great pick for the reasons you mentioned and has an attractive entry price right now.  Another one that would compare favorably to your metrics is Sanchez SN.<br/><br/>A couple other advantages of Eagle Ford over the Bakken are transportation costs due to proximity to the Gulf, and average drilling costs. Due to rocky ground vs. soft earth and depth needed to get to the oil, Bakken wells can average $9M each to drill while some in the Eagle Ford can be drilled closer to $6M.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Would You Like To Know About Your Favorite REIT?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/330973-brad-thomas/1248681-what-would-you-like-to-know-about-your-favorite-reit?source=feed#comment-11295831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11295831</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I would like to hear your thoughts on how EFC compares to mREITs like NLY and AGNC.  Thanks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 15:05:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I would like to hear your thoughts on how EFC compares to mREITs like NLY and AGNC.  Thanks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Good Option Strategy: Exploiting Earnings - Associated Rising Volatility</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/310703/comments?source=feed#comment-11160381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11160381</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Wonder how many people got caught in these while the market was closed Monday and Tuesday.  I was fortunate not to.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:18:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Wonder how many people got caught in these while the market was closed Monday and Tuesday.  I was fortunate not to.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>For Dividends, It Might Be Time To Explore Business Development Companies</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/902371/comments?source=feed#comment-10144841</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10144841</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Among the BDCs, I like SLRC the best. Second best, I'd say HTGC. Here is a detailed explanation of why HTGC may be a better BDC than many of its peers:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/dcal'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 20:49:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Among the BDCs, I like SLRC the best. Second best, I'd say HTGC. Here is a detailed explanation of why HTGC may be a better BDC than many of its peers:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/dcal'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Buckle (BKE) declares $0.20/share quarterly dividend, in line with previous. Forward yield 1.68%. For shareholders of record Oct 15. Payable Oct 26. Ex-div date Oct 11. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/543001?source=feed#comment-9574121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9574121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[So are they skipping their special dividend this year?  They announced it along with their October quarterly dividend last year.  That would be a pretty big deal.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:43:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[So are they skipping their special dividend this year?  They announced it along with their October quarterly dividend last year.  That would be a pretty big deal.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2 DIY Dividend Stocks To Buy And 1 DIY Dividend Stock To Avoid</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/871001/comments?source=feed#comment-9541341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9541341</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Agree, Todd, long NCT and KMI.  Good article and explanations.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:40:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Agree, Todd, long NCT and KMI.  Good article and explanations.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Furniture Brands: This $1 Stock Could Surge With The Housing Turnaround Or A Short Squeeze</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/861001/comments?source=feed#comment-9478691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9478691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Nice call on the short squeeze!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 22:17:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nice call on the short squeeze!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vanguard Natural Resources Combines High Yield Plus Dividend Growth</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/823121/comments?source=feed#comment-9434051</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9434051</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You can't add those two numbers together Michael.  The 4% rate of dividend increases means 8.5% this year, 8.8% next year, 9.2% the next year, etc.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 23:20:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You can't add those two numbers together Michael.  The 4% rate of dividend increases means 8.5% this year, 8.8% next year, 9.2% the next year, etc.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
