<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Ted Bear's Comments</title>
    <description>Ted Bear's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/959280/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Ben Bernanke may not have overtly mentioned monetary policy during prepared remarks for a commencement address at Bard College Saturday, but he did reference Yogi Berra, and in the process made a statement that those of a cynical persuasion might say could have been pulled not only from the quips of a baseball legend, but from any recent speech by hawkish regional Fed presidents (I, II, III): "It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future." Some would undoubtedly say the Chairman should consider this sage advice when making conjectures about the supposedly benign effects of policy tightening.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1034021?source=feed#comment-19001771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19001771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The likely outcome...the future...is not particuylarly hard to predict. You water the garden; it grows. You turn off the spigiot; it withers and wilts.<br/><br/>What is difficult to predict is when this will occur. We now even have some pudits suggesting that the &quot;qantitative &quot; will run out before the 'easing'. Regardless, the effect of no more rain will produce the same outcome.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:54:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The likely outcome...the future...is not particuylarly hard to predict. You water the garden; it grows. You turn off the spigiot; it withers and wilts.<br/><br/>What is difficult to predict is when this will occur. We now even have some pudits suggesting that the &quot;qantitative &quot; will run out before the 'easing'. Regardless, the effect of no more rain will produce the same outcome.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shares of Tesla Motors (TSLA) rip 12.9% higher premarket to $95.75 after the company files its mixed shelf and Elon Musk pours in some more capital. Reality check: Tesla now trades with a market cap just under 20% of Ford's valuation while selling only a fraction of the cars Ford sells indicating investors are betting either Tesla will become a "major" automaker or claim the highest margins in the industry.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1029161?source=feed#comment-18889951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18889951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Some things defy logic...and gravity...until they do.<br/><br/>What's it worth five years from now? Struggles to turn a modest profit? Shares will be trading for five bucks or so.<br/><br/>But for now, it is all laughs and giggles.<br/><br/>BTW, i am VERY pleased that someone finally put together a decent electric automobile. Why Ford, GM or Toyota couldn't do this on a scale which pleased the broad market is another of those incredible mysteries of which life seems to be littered.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:32:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Some things defy logic...and gravity...until they do.<br/><br/>What's it worth five years from now? Struggles to turn a modest profit? Shares will be trading for five bucks or so.<br/><br/>But for now, it is all laughs and giggles.<br/><br/>BTW, i am VERY pleased that someone finally put together a decent electric automobile. Why Ford, GM or Toyota couldn't do this on a scale which pleased the broad market is another of those incredible mysteries of which life seems to be littered.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Citigroup (C) joins AIG in the hedge fund hotel (Apple was kicked out in late 2012/early 2013), with this week's 13F filings showing a number of well-known funds adding or initiating positions in Q1 (though Tepper's Appaloosa pared his). The stock's up 40% since Michael Corbat took the reins from Vikram Pandit and hit another 52-week high yesterday.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1028981?source=feed#comment-18888451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18888451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[How does Tepper go on national television on Tuesday and tell the world how much they love Citibank, that it is a huge position, and then...on Wednesday announces that they are selling stock?<br/><br/>Didn't there used to be something called the SEC which frowned on this sort of pump and dump stuff?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 07:49:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How does Tepper go on national television on Tuesday and tell the world how much they love Citibank, that it is a huge position, and then...on Wednesday announces that they are selling stock?<br/><br/>Didn't there used to be something called the SEC which frowned on this sort of pump and dump stuff?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Market recap: Why do people listen to David Tepper? Because he's often right. His appearance on CNBC this morning to share his bullish views set the table for today's rally, led by big banks including BofA and AmEx. However, techs lagged after Apple sold off on no apparent news. Nymex crude ended below $95 as the IEA detailed a "supply shock"; gold fell to a three-week low at $1,424.50.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1024802?source=feed#comment-18824732</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18824732</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Tepper laid it out...net of $800 billion per year is looking for a home. <br/><br/>What he didn't say in the fine print is that his math means the already insurmountable deficit increases by $200 billion each period. And he didn't say what happens when the $85 billion/month infusion winds down......<br/><br/>That is the key question, I can keep a leaky ballon up for a LONG time as long as i keep adding helium. It is inevtiable, unless i fix the leak (which Congress has not even remotely considered the idea) that the balloon wil deflate once i stop adding helium.<br/><br/>Ditto BB, the punch bowl, and the market.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 17:09:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Tepper laid it out...net of $800 billion per year is looking for a home. <br/><br/>What he didn't say in the fine print is that his math means the already insurmountable deficit increases by $200 billion each period. And he didn't say what happens when the $85 billion/month infusion winds down......<br/><br/>That is the key question, I can keep a leaky ballon up for a LONG time as long as i keep adding helium. It is inevtiable, unless i fix the leak (which Congress has not even remotely considered the idea) that the balloon wil deflate once i stop adding helium.<br/><br/>Ditto BB, the punch bowl, and the market.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tepper stays bullish. Confounding gnomes who whispered the hedge fund honcho was turning cautious on stocks, David Tepper tells the CNBC crew the wave of liquidity that turned him bullish in the first place is getting even bigger. Fed tapering? So what, he says. The U.S. budget deficit over the next 6 months will only be $100B, while the Fed is scheduled to buy about $500B. That's $400B coming out of the bond market and going to investors who can buy more fixed-income, more real estate, more stocks. SPY erases losses and gets back to flat premarket.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1023101?source=feed#comment-18802961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18802961</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[But....BB told us he does not have a clue where the stock market is, and he does not target equity prices. Remember that from his last nerws conference?<br/><br/>Certainly with equity prices fueling the wealth effect, preserving retirement plans for the greast unwashed, and saving corporate america in the face of declining sales, there would be no reason for the Fed to be concerned with the stock market.<br/><br/>Would there?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 08:46:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[But....BB told us he does not have a clue where the stock market is, and he does not target equity prices. Remember that from his last nerws conference?<br/><br/>Certainly with equity prices fueling the wealth effect, preserving retirement plans for the greast unwashed, and saving corporate america in the face of declining sales, there would be no reason for the Fed to be concerned with the stock market.<br/><br/>Would there?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More from Tepper: "We're going to get this hyper-drive market," unless the Fed starts tapering its purchases, he says (referencing 1999), adding the June meeting wouldn't be a bad time to get started. He pulls out this chart from a recent FRBNY report, showing stocks remain cheap - the equity premium to bonds is as high as it's been in the last 50 years.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1023151?source=feed#comment-18802771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18802771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The Equity Risk Premium work actaully came form the Fed in a report which was published last week. Teper is correct in his assessement.<br/><br/>However, what happens when the Fed can no longer, for a variety of structural reasons, buy $500 Billion of debt every six months? The flip side of Teppers hypothesis is that, in his rosy case scenario of $400/$100 billion, is that the $100 billion gets added to an already game changing Federal Debt approaching $20 Trillion.<br/><br/>THAT sort of deficit has never bade well for any economy. What was the expression, we have the 'known knowns, the known unkowns...and then there are the unknown unknowns'. That is the frightening part.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 08:40:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The Equity Risk Premium work actaully came form the Fed in a report which was published last week. Teper is correct in his assessement.<br/><br/>However, what happens when the Fed can no longer, for a variety of structural reasons, buy $500 Billion of debt every six months? The flip side of Teppers hypothesis is that, in his rosy case scenario of $400/$100 billion, is that the $100 billion gets added to an already game changing Federal Debt approaching $20 Trillion.<br/><br/>THAT sort of deficit has never bade well for any economy. What was the expression, we have the 'known knowns, the known unkowns...and then there are the unknown unknowns'. That is the frightening part.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jamie Dimon is threatening to leave JPMorgan (JPM) if stripped of the Chairman role, sources say.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1019911?source=feed#comment-18718171</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18718171</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I am not sure the final chapter on Dimon is yet written.<br/><br/>There were guys like Jack Welch,  Sandy Weill, and that guy from AIG who drove great companies into the ground--all the while they got folks to think they were the greatest managers ever to walk across the face of the earth. Turns out they took an entire economy down the drain, while they made themselevs filthy rich.<br/><br/>Too many little things..and not so little, really, are starting to pop up under Dimon's watch. This guy could turn out to be just as evil as the guys which society previously lauded as having been 'great managers'. Dimon comes across as being very believable and sincere...the old Warren Buffet 'aw shucks', but then we have the London Whale, the commodity trading, the gold puke, the silver corner...and????? You don't just lose billions and get away with saying it was just small peanuts and i was too busy with other things.<br/><br/>If i was the board and my management made a threat like Dimon has supposedly just made, i think his office would be empty on Monday. Nobody is THAT good.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 18:21:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I am not sure the final chapter on Dimon is yet written.<br/><br/>There were guys like Jack Welch,  Sandy Weill, and that guy from AIG who drove great companies into the ground--all the while they got folks to think they were the greatest managers ever to walk across the face of the earth. Turns out they took an entire economy down the drain, while they made themselevs filthy rich.<br/><br/>Too many little things..and not so little, really, are starting to pop up under Dimon's watch. This guy could turn out to be just as evil as the guys which society previously lauded as having been 'great managers'. Dimon comes across as being very believable and sincere...the old Warren Buffet 'aw shucks', but then we have the London Whale, the commodity trading, the gold puke, the silver corner...and????? You don't just lose billions and get away with saying it was just small peanuts and i was too busy with other things.<br/><br/>If i was the board and my management made a threat like Dimon has supposedly just made, i think his office would be empty on Monday. Nobody is THAT good.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chipotle (CMG) dips in the post session, giving back most of the day's gains after hedge fund manager Jeff Gundlach repeated his short thesis on the company during his presentation today at the Ira Sohn Conference. &amp;ldquo;All you need to compete with CMG&amp;rsquo;s core business is a taco truck,&amp;rdquo; he quips. In fact, Gundlach takes it a step further, saying he's not interested in virtually "anything related to middle-class consumer discretionary income.&amp;rdquo;</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1011831?source=feed#comment-18603021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18603021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think Ben has sort of usurped that 'middle class discretionary income' for the next few generations.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 20:08:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think Ben has sort of usurped that 'middle class discretionary income' for the next few generations.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG): FQ2 EPS of $1.60 misses by $0.41. Revenue of $1.02B misses by $0.12B. Shares  -3.5% AH. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1001811?source=feed#comment-18512901</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18512901</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This stock could be the poster child for this market.<br/><br/>Months ago they issued a profit warning, and the shares went up.<br/><br/>Now, they miss earnings by a huge margin, and the shares barely flinch.<br/><br/>Some day some of these things will matter.<br/><br/>But for today? Not so much.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 18:52:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This stock could be the poster child for this market.<br/><br/>Months ago they issued a profit warning, and the shares went up.<br/><br/>Now, they miss earnings by a huge margin, and the shares barely flinch.<br/><br/>Some day some of these things will matter.<br/><br/>But for today? Not so much.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It happened in December when the stock market passed 13,000. It happened again in February when the Dow passed through 14,000. Now, as we bulldoze through 15,000 today we could be set for some  sideways trading over the short term. Each time the Dow has broken through a psychological hurdle recently, we ended up trading in a volatile range over the next month. Atlantis Asset's Michael Cohn thinks the big number may be cause for a brief pause, but the Fed's spigot is what's driving this marktet - and it's not getting turned off anytime soon.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/998941?source=feed#comment-18428341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18428341</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It aint over til the Fed stops pumping.<br/><br/>And then?&gt; OMG, the exits will look like pinholes. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 21:02:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It aint over til the Fed stops pumping.<br/><br/>And then?&gt; OMG, the exits will look like pinholes. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>JPMorgan (JPM) has "transitioned from model citizen to problem child" in the eyes of Washington, the NY Times says. The latest evidence of the shift is a government document (reviewed by the Times) which reportedly says the firm dreamed up "manipulative schemes" in order to wring profits from "money-losing power plants." The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission also says Blythe Masters (mother of the synthetic CDO) "falsely denied under oath her awareness of" certain activities allegedly undertaken by a group of Houston energy traders. It isn't clear whether actions will be taken against JPM, which will have a chance to respond to the allegations.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/995531?source=feed#comment-18397131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18397131</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You know what is even worse about all of this?<br/><br/>Maybe i was naive, but i have thought, even through the London Whale thing, that Jamie Dimon was cut from a special cloth. A decent person. Moral. Unique in his desire to do well by doing right.<br/><br/>It turns out he is just like the worst of them: say whatever you have to, but do whatever you can to make money. No regard for moral fiber, or the laws of the land.<br/><br/>Jamie is done. Throw him on the heap with the worst of the Jack Welch's, the  Maurice Greenberg's and the Sandy Weill's. They burned the trust which people gave them, and now live a (rich) exile still pretending to be something they never were.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 08:56:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You know what is even worse about all of this?<br/><br/>Maybe i was naive, but i have thought, even through the London Whale thing, that Jamie Dimon was cut from a special cloth. A decent person. Moral. Unique in his desire to do well by doing right.<br/><br/>It turns out he is just like the worst of them: say whatever you have to, but do whatever you can to make money. No regard for moral fiber, or the laws of the land.<br/><br/>Jamie is done. Throw him on the heap with the worst of the Jack Welch's, the  Maurice Greenberg's and the Sandy Weill's. They burned the trust which people gave them, and now live a (rich) exile still pretending to be something they never were.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>JPMorgan (JPM) has "transitioned from model citizen to problem child" in the eyes of Washington, the NY Times says. The latest evidence of the shift is a government document (reviewed by the Times) which reportedly says the firm dreamed up "manipulative schemes" in order to wring profits from "money-losing power plants." The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission also says Blythe Masters (mother of the synthetic CDO) "falsely denied under oath her awareness of" certain activities allegedly undertaken by a group of Houston energy traders. It isn't clear whether actions will be taken against JPM, which will have a chance to respond to the allegations.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/995531?source=feed#comment-18394191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18394191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Sadly, if you assume that the folks on the other side of your business are nefariousit it is likely that you won't be disappointed to read the news that they have been behaving in a manner which is certainly immoral, and probably illegal.<br/><br/>Even more sadly, these practice have become so widespread that even the people we employ to curb them are more a part of the problem than they are of the solution.<br/><br/>I think they call it morally bankrupt....probably right on both counts.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 07:17:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sadly, if you assume that the folks on the other side of your business are nefariousit it is likely that you won't be disappointed to read the news that they have been behaving in a manner which is certainly immoral, and probably illegal.<br/><br/>Even more sadly, these practice have become so widespread that even the people we employ to curb them are more a part of the problem than they are of the solution.<br/><br/>I think they call it morally bankrupt....probably right on both counts.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Some of Wall Streets titans of finance say they are pulling away from the stock and bond markets, warning that central bank policies around the globe had set prices soaring too high. Apollo Management's Joshua Harris is one such manager. His advice to investors: "Run&amp;mdash;do not walk" from bonds at current prices. He doesn't limit that advice to just bonds either. Harris warns of overvaluation in virtually all traditional asset classes. Another Apollo manager, Leon Black, agrees, calling the current market climate a "fabulous environment" - as long as you're selling.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/984921?source=feed#comment-18294921</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18294921</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It doesn't end until people 'perceive' that the punch bowl is about to be withdrawn.<br/><br/>We have hardly seen a decent earnings report, and there have been plenty of downright gawd awful reports...all of which have been a 'reason' to go buy more. That sort of illogical logic is just the very thing which leads to a LOT of miserable people.<br/><br/>Bernanke told us...he doesn't target asset prices, and barely knows that the market is up.....<br/><br/>I'd be a seller of that statement as well.<br/><br/>Funyy..i just moved on to another thread, and what does this guy say (Which hasn't mattered a hoot thus far, and won't--until it does): <br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/tpf7'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:38:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It doesn't end until people 'perceive' that the punch bowl is about to be withdrawn.<br/><br/>We have hardly seen a decent earnings report, and there have been plenty of downright gawd awful reports...all of which have been a 'reason' to go buy more. That sort of illogical logic is just the very thing which leads to a LOT of miserable people.<br/><br/>Bernanke told us...he doesn't target asset prices, and barely knows that the market is up.....<br/><br/>I'd be a seller of that statement as well.<br/><br/>Funyy..i just moved on to another thread, and what does this guy say (Which hasn't mattered a hoot thus far, and won't--until it does): <br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/tpf7'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Some of Wall Streets titans of finance say they are pulling away from the stock and bond markets, warning that central bank policies around the globe had set prices soaring too high. Apollo Management's Joshua Harris is one such manager. His advice to investors: "Run&amp;mdash;do not walk" from bonds at current prices. He doesn't limit that advice to just bonds either. Harris warns of overvaluation in virtually all traditional asset classes. Another Apollo manager, Leon Black, agrees, calling the current market climate a "fabulous environment" - as long as you're selling.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/984921?source=feed#comment-18294831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18294831</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It doesn't end until people 'perceive' that the punch bowl is about to be withdrawn.<br/><br/>We have hardly seen a decent earnings report, and there have been plenty of downright gawd awful reports...all of which have been a 'reason' to go buy more. That sort of illogical logic is just the very thing which leads to a LOT of miserable people.<br/><br/>Bernanke told us...he doesn't target asset prices, and barely knows that the market is up.....<br/><br/>I'd be a seller of that statement as well.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:35:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It doesn't end until people 'perceive' that the punch bowl is about to be withdrawn.<br/><br/>We have hardly seen a decent earnings report, and there have been plenty of downright gawd awful reports...all of which have been a 'reason' to go buy more. That sort of illogical logic is just the very thing which leads to a LOT of miserable people.<br/><br/>Bernanke told us...he doesn't target asset prices, and barely knows that the market is up.....<br/><br/>I'd be a seller of that statement as well.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tech guidance roundup: 1) Flextronics (FLEX - earnings) expects FQ1 revenue of $5.3B-$5.6B and EPS of $0.12-$0.16 vs. a consensus of $5.45B and $0.16. 2) Sourcefire (FIRE - earnings) expects Q2 revenue of $60.5M-$63.5M and EPS of $0.13-$0.16, largely below a consensus of $63.3M and $0.19. 3) Jive Software (JIVE - earnings) expects Q2 revenue of $34.5M-$35.5M and EPS of -$0.16 to -$0.18, below a consensus of $36.2M and -$0.14. 2013 guidance is for revenue of $148M-$153M and EPS of -$0.55 to -$0.62 vs. a consensus of $151.9M and -$0.56. FLEX -2.2% AH. FIRE +4.7%. JIVE -0.7%. (Flextronics PR) (Sourcefire PR) (Jive PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/983861?source=feed#comment-18288381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18288381</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Imagine if FIRE had actually come close to making their numbers...and not guided lower.<br/><br/>You know you are in moments of extreme exuberance when missing doesn't even dent the share price.<br/><br/>But in the end......]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:15:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Imagine if FIRE had actually come close to making their numbers...and not guided lower.<br/><br/>You know you are in moments of extreme exuberance when missing doesn't even dent the share price.<br/><br/>But in the end......]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Not really news, but good enough to knock stocks (DIA, SPY, QQQ) well of their highs in the last hour is the Bundesbank - in a filing to Germany's high court -&amp;nbsp;signaling its displeasure with the ECB's Outright Monetary Transactions. OMT hasn't been used yet, but was put in place by the central bank last year to - if necessary - buy the debt of peripheral countries.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/970921?source=feed#comment-18097911</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18097911</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hasn't the Feb, through a backstop of a backstop, already made this irrelevant in practical terms?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:16:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hasn't the Feb, through a backstop of a backstop, already made this irrelevant in practical terms?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Poor positioning by portfolio managers is suggesting a near-term market pullback may be on the way, says BMO's Brian Belski. Right now he says they're inundated with questions from portfolio managers who are "clearly under-performing the market."  When that happens, you know that managers are straying from their discipline. "When they stray," Bielski warns, "bad things happen, the market rolls over, you do emotional things and sell stock."</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/958531?source=feed#comment-17956241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17956241</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The 'Market' as we historically know it is on hiatus. There is no fundamental reason for the performance of equites, nor bonds for that matter. Who ever heard of record trillions of dollar of debt with no chance that it could ever be repaid, and interest rates at zero?<br/><br/>The 'marklet' is where it is because the Fed has opened the spogit wide, at zero short term cost to the nation. While it is true that the majority of portfolio managers underperform (which is why it pays to own unmanaged indices, btw), it is fair to give them a bit of a break ( I never thought i would say that!) this time around. They are looking at weak fundamentals, high unemployment, huge deficits, the worst of political shenanigans in Washington, and conlcuding, probably correctly (yes, i know all about the wall of worry), that this is not a good time to be overweight equities. When a market is detached from the fundamentals it is probably a good time to disengage. They won't be correct until the punch bowl is withdrawn or the nation finally recognizes that it is kaput: but when it does, the exit doors from the 'market' will be boarded shut.<br/><br/>Caveat Emptor (and enjoy the ride if you think you are quick enough to get through the door before it closes). ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:03:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The 'Market' as we historically know it is on hiatus. There is no fundamental reason for the performance of equites, nor bonds for that matter. Who ever heard of record trillions of dollar of debt with no chance that it could ever be repaid, and interest rates at zero?<br/><br/>The 'marklet' is where it is because the Fed has opened the spogit wide, at zero short term cost to the nation. While it is true that the majority of portfolio managers underperform (which is why it pays to own unmanaged indices, btw), it is fair to give them a bit of a break ( I never thought i would say that!) this time around. They are looking at weak fundamentals, high unemployment, huge deficits, the worst of political shenanigans in Washington, and conlcuding, probably correctly (yes, i know all about the wall of worry), that this is not a good time to be overweight equities. When a market is detached from the fundamentals it is probably a good time to disengage. They won't be correct until the punch bowl is withdrawn or the nation finally recognizes that it is kaput: but when it does, the exit doors from the 'market' will be boarded shut.<br/><br/>Caveat Emptor (and enjoy the ride if you think you are quick enough to get through the door before it closes). ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on Dell: Though Carl Icahn is deemed unlikely to go through with his preliminary offer for Dell, the WSJ reports he will "consider a hostile bid" in the event Dell shareholders shoot down Silver Lake/Michael Dell's LBO offer. Southeastern Asset and other top shareholders have been quite hostile to Silver Lake's offer, but will recent PC industry data make them reconsider?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/955281?source=feed#comment-17848191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17848191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Poor Carl...little by little he is making a mess for himself and his investors.....Wounded in HLF, and now burried in DELL.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:19:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Poor Carl...little by little he is making a mess for himself and his investors.....Wounded in HLF, and now burried in DELL.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A key barometer for the global economy, copper, broke through key support today, sending out a danger signal for the metal and possibly stocks and other risk assets as well. The metal finished the day at $3.1875, its first close below key $3.20 support since October 2011. "It reminds me a lot of gold before that big breakdown," says Auerbach Grayson's Richard Ross. "This is the first significant break in two years," Ross says, and when gold broke below that level it broke hard. Ross thinks copper is setting itself up for precisely that type of move.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/950131?source=feed#comment-17765691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17765691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[There are SO many things which fall under the 'it's different this time' mantra, but in the end, when the market collapses people will look back and say, well, duh, it was obvious...<br/><br/>Revenue growth (or lack thereof), trillion dollar deficits (with interest rates at zero), poor market breadth, low volume, failure to make new highs by too many stocks, non-confirmations by MANY markets (NASDAQ and Transportations, for Instance), high unemployment, NO job creation even though we are pumping a trillion dollars a year into the economy, political shenanigans which have created HUGE wealth inequities, unpunished criminal behavior (think MF Golbal (stealing customer funds), BAC (fraud in the purchase of Merrill) or MS (insider trading by the CEO) and a host of other things which 'dont matter because it is different this time'.<br/><br/>It isn't different this time, but maybe the timing is different. Free money for four years has attempted to mask the message, but that we face the same environment with the same likely consequences as we did in the thrities is unavoidable. THAT is the message which copper is delivering. That is the message that gold sent this past week: We are in a deflationary environement, which is a horror show of unequaled proportions to the Fed. When you are borrowed up the kazoo, what is the BEST antidote to your problems? Inflation, and we aint got none.<br/><br/>If you are not listening, or pretending not to hear it, you do so at your own peril.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:59:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[There are SO many things which fall under the 'it's different this time' mantra, but in the end, when the market collapses people will look back and say, well, duh, it was obvious...<br/><br/>Revenue growth (or lack thereof), trillion dollar deficits (with interest rates at zero), poor market breadth, low volume, failure to make new highs by too many stocks, non-confirmations by MANY markets (NASDAQ and Transportations, for Instance), high unemployment, NO job creation even though we are pumping a trillion dollars a year into the economy, political shenanigans which have created HUGE wealth inequities, unpunished criminal behavior (think MF Golbal (stealing customer funds), BAC (fraud in the purchase of Merrill) or MS (insider trading by the CEO) and a host of other things which 'dont matter because it is different this time'.<br/><br/>It isn't different this time, but maybe the timing is different. Free money for four years has attempted to mask the message, but that we face the same environment with the same likely consequences as we did in the thrities is unavoidable. THAT is the message which copper is delivering. That is the message that gold sent this past week: We are in a deflationary environement, which is a horror show of unequaled proportions to the Fed. When you are borrowed up the kazoo, what is the BEST antidote to your problems? Inflation, and we aint got none.<br/><br/>If you are not listening, or pretending not to hear it, you do so at your own peril.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goldman Sachs (GS) has possibly generated $1.2B in revenue over the past six years from its involvement with Dollar General (DG), Reuters guesstimates. Goldman, which took part in Dollar General's leveraged buyout in 2007, has earned money from the sale of the retailer's stock after its IPO in 2009, as well as from management fees, interest payments and other charges. </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/934611?source=feed#comment-17439711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17439711</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Ummmm......are people so naiive as to not understand that this is what Goldman does to earn a living? Where do folks think those billions that they 'earn' every quarter come from?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 07:02:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Ummmm......are people so naiive as to not understand that this is what Goldman does to earn a living? Where do folks think those billions that they 'earn' every quarter come from?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>With existing home prices now +10% year-on-year, some worry Fed-induced low interest rates are giving the housing market a sugar high. But with the threat of higher interest rates on the horizon, buyers may continue to step in and buy now before homes become even more expensive.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/929551?source=feed#comment-17331751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17331751</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The cash purchases are attributable to hedge fund buying....they pay cash with 10:1 leveraged funds....so it is not really a 'cash' purchase in every sense, it's just that the leverage is not with the seller, nor is a bank directly involved.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 19:25:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The cash purchases are attributable to hedge fund buying....they pay cash with 10:1 leveraged funds....so it is not really a 'cash' purchase in every sense, it's just that the leverage is not with the seller, nor is a bank directly involved.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>There's trouble brewing again in sovereign bailout land as Portugal's Constitutional Court strikes down austerity measures in a binding decision that is expected to create a gap of &amp;euro;860M in the country's budget. The move could put Portugal's international bailout package in jeopardy although some economists believe a workaround is possible, according to WSJ.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/929201?source=feed#comment-17285961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17285961</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Isn't Jack Lew over there to pull another Turbo Timmy? GIve US your tired, your poor, your junk debt.<br/><br/>We give Yankee bucks for any garbage you can drag in.<br/><br/>Problem solved.....until judgement day--whenever that might be.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 17:56:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Isn't Jack Lew over there to pull another Turbo Timmy? GIve US your tired, your poor, your junk debt.<br/><br/>We give Yankee bucks for any garbage you can drag in.<br/><br/>Problem solved.....until judgement day--whenever that might be.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Justice Department's reluctance to investigate fraud at the biggest financial institutions probably lowers the value of their equity, says hedge fund guru Jim Chanos. Basing its decision on whether to prosecute in part on the systemic effect it would have on the financial system has caused a really reasonable, serious, continued undermining of trust in our markets. Wall Street executives wondering why their stock continues to lag have their answer: The public doesn't trust them because they know the government is turning a blind eye to fraud.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/927151?source=feed#comment-17242501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17242501</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Well, that would be you and me who finance the government...until we no longer decide to do so.<br/><br/>That it has gone on this long just amazes me, but human behavior is very hard to predict. Just look at the stock market...is there a soul alive who doesn't know that it is a levitation job by the Fed? And one day we will wake up, quite innocuously, and things will have fallen down limit. Not because there was some particular news, but because 'everyone' (the collective crowd) had a change of heart. Human behavior....an ellusive concept to predict.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 20:28:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Well, that would be you and me who finance the government...until we no longer decide to do so.<br/><br/>That it has gone on this long just amazes me, but human behavior is very hard to predict. Just look at the stock market...is there a soul alive who doesn't know that it is a levitation job by the Fed? And one day we will wake up, quite innocuously, and things will have fallen down limit. Not because there was some particular news, but because 'everyone' (the collective crowd) had a change of heart. Human behavior....an ellusive concept to predict.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Justice Department's reluctance to investigate fraud at the biggest financial institutions probably lowers the value of their equity, says hedge fund guru Jim Chanos. Basing its decision on whether to prosecute in part on the systemic effect it would have on the financial system has caused a really reasonable, serious, continued undermining of trust in our markets. Wall Street executives wondering why their stock continues to lag have their answer: The public doesn't trust them because they know the government is turning a blind eye to fraud.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/927151?source=feed#comment-17241801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17241801</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You hint at the size compexities, XR, but even when the fraud is flushed out, the penalties don't even match the ill gotten gains.<br/><br/>I give you MF Global, where customer funds were used for in-house gambling, and did Jon Corzine, or anyone else for that matter, ever spend a night in jail?<br/><br/>And what did Goldman pay for defradung people of billions in the mortgage market? A paltry $500 million or something similiar, and Blankfein was never even close to wearing the iron hand cuffs.<br/><br/>You want to clean up these banks, and our financial system? Put the exectuves in jail for 25 years, fine the companies a year or two of earnings, and make it come from the executives--not the shareholders.<br/><br/>That will solve a LOT of the regulatory shortcomings.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 20:06:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You hint at the size compexities, XR, but even when the fraud is flushed out, the penalties don't even match the ill gotten gains.<br/><br/>I give you MF Global, where customer funds were used for in-house gambling, and did Jon Corzine, or anyone else for that matter, ever spend a night in jail?<br/><br/>And what did Goldman pay for defradung people of billions in the mortgage market? A paltry $500 million or something similiar, and Blankfein was never even close to wearing the iron hand cuffs.<br/><br/>You want to clean up these banks, and our financial system? Put the exectuves in jail for 25 years, fine the companies a year or two of earnings, and make it come from the executives--not the shareholders.<br/><br/>That will solve a LOT of the regulatory shortcomings.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The "Fed put" stocks have enjoyed for the past four years will fade in H2 and send the S&amp;amp;P 500 below 1,400 by year's end, Wells Fargo's Gina Martin Adams believes. If the economy improves, expect the Fed to be more  hard pressed in justifying near-zero interest rates and easing efforts; mere chatter about an unwind  in 2014 will be enough to weigh on stocks.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/908861?source=feed#comment-16800401</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16800401</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Not if the Fed keeps the punch bowl full to overflowing, it won't.<br/><br/>You heard Benanke...&quot;we don't try to influence assets prices&quot;...but he sure knew an awful lot about the exact performance of the stock market bubble he has created.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 20:00:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Not if the Fed keeps the punch bowl full to overflowing, it won't.<br/><br/>You heard Benanke...&quot;we don't try to influence assets prices&quot;...but he sure knew an awful lot about the exact performance of the stock market bubble he has created.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Not helping JPMorgan (JPM) is the rehashing of the London Whale saga, with a just-released Senate report claiming Jamie Dimon withheld critical data from regulators. A hearing is set for tomorrow (Dimon will not testify), and it's possible the DOJ will be called upon to investigate further. It's hard to believe the Fed request for JPM to "address weaknesses" and the London Whale incident aren't linked. Shares -2.1% AH.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/890101?source=feed#comment-16299021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16299021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Was that a cockroach?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:00:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Was that a cockroach?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Valero Energy (VLO) says it has secured U.S. government permission to ship up to 90K bbl/day of Texas crude to Canada, joining other companies receiving similar licenses in light of rising output. CEO&amp;nbsp;Bill Klesse told analysts last week the U.S. Gulf Coast is increasingly &amp;ldquo;flooding&amp;rdquo; with  U.S. output: &amp;ldquo;There&amp;rsquo;s so much oil, it&amp;rsquo;s got to be moving... We're going to take some to Quebec.&amp;rdquo;</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/884421?source=feed#comment-16201491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16201491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[People can rationalize all they wish, but the stock market is where it is for one reason, and one reason only: Free Money.<br/>Maybe earnngs are slightly better, and maybe employment is slightly better, and maybe the disasters off the large banks balance sheets are helping, but at the end of the day, you show me three trillion dollars in zero cost moeny and i'll show you a good time.<br/><br/>The punch bowl can stay a LONG time, and the levitation can last a long time, but in the end, you remove the free money and things will find an appropriate 'natural' level.<br/><br/>That, folks, is what copper is telling us. And has been telling us throughout the last several months.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:33:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[People can rationalize all they wish, but the stock market is where it is for one reason, and one reason only: Free Money.<br/>Maybe earnngs are slightly better, and maybe employment is slightly better, and maybe the disasters off the large banks balance sheets are helping, but at the end of the day, you show me three trillion dollars in zero cost moeny and i'll show you a good time.<br/><br/>The punch bowl can stay a LONG time, and the levitation can last a long time, but in the end, you remove the free money and things will find an appropriate 'natural' level.<br/><br/>That, folks, is what copper is telling us. And has been telling us throughout the last several months.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The dollar's surge to a three-and-a-half year high against the yen will only go higher, says Dennis Gartman. He expects it to hit 125 against the yen within the next two years. "I've been short since October," Gartman says. "I really, honestly, see no reason to be anything other than that." The yen has already weakened around 18% against the dollar since mid-November, as Japan's Liberal Democratic Party pledged a more dovish approach to monetary policy to revive the Japanese economy. (Video)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/878341?source=feed#comment-16061001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16061001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Is this the same Gartman who told us that the stock markets were broadcasting a sell signal....because we had a single down day?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 20:44:10 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Is this the same Gartman who told us that the stock markets were broadcasting a sell signal....because we had a single down day?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>February Nonfarm Payrolls:&amp;nbsp;+236K&amp;nbsp;vs. consensus +160K, 119K previous (revised from +157K). Unemployment rate&amp;nbsp;7.7%&amp;nbsp;vs. consensus 7.9%, 7.9% previous.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/876961?source=feed#comment-16026941</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16026941</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[For three trillion dollars we get a lousy 175,000 jobs? <br/><br/>Do the math.....annulaized, that 's about $1.4 MM per job.......<br/><br/>We're doing fine. <br/><br/>You want fries with that?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 09:19:22 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[For three trillion dollars we get a lousy 175,000 jobs? <br/><br/>Do the math.....annulaized, that 's about $1.4 MM per job.......<br/><br/>We're doing fine. <br/><br/>You want fries with that?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After-hours movers following the Fed Stress Tests: Citigroup (C +2.5%) is the biggest gainer after looking like it's the most overcapitalized of the large banks with a 8.3% common ratio. BAC +0.8%.&amp;nbsp;GS -0.7%, MS -1% after both just squeaked over the 5% bar. There's not a lot of movement in the rest of the banks.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/875761?source=feed#comment-16010381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16010381</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The wily old coot gets paid to wait.....<br/><br/>And if Uncle Warren said their capital is fine....well, then it must be so, right?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 20:14:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The wily old coot gets paid to wait.....<br/><br/>And if Uncle Warren said their capital is fine....well, then it must be so, right?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
