<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Patrick Young's Comments</title>
    <description>Patrick Young's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/968229/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>XME: My Favorite Way to Play Commodities</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/278493/comments?source=feed#comment-18318801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18318801</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It's always nice to get the opportunity to buy stocks cheaper.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 12:36:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It's always nice to get the opportunity to buy stocks cheaper.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XME: My Favorite Way to Play Commodities</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/278493/comments?source=feed#comment-18316761</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18316761</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[There is a high degree of correlation between FCX and XME. I am long FCX, which is to say, I also think XME will recover.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 11:53:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[There is a high degree of correlation between FCX and XME. I am long FCX, which is to say, I also think XME will recover.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XME: My Favorite Way to Play Commodities</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/278493/comments?source=feed#comment-18312591</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18312591</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I like the viewpoint that XME and other &quot;cyclicals&quot; have not benefited from cheap money. Commodity producers require actual growth to outperform. However, when, not if, growth returns, and especially under conditions where the dollar weakness will flatten or reverse, these names will catch up with the gains in the overall market and continue to outperform for some time. XME has also been hurt by the decline of US coal demand (~20% of holdings). It is doubtful whether US coal demand will ever recover (bearish for railroads), but perhaps the miners will find overseas markets for coal. Full disclosure, I basically exchanged XME for FCX when FCX took a nose dive after revealing they would diversify into oil and gas. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 10:36:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I like the viewpoint that XME and other &quot;cyclicals&quot; have not benefited from cheap money. Commodity producers require actual growth to outperform. However, when, not if, growth returns, and especially under conditions where the dollar weakness will flatten or reverse, these names will catch up with the gains in the overall market and continue to outperform for some time. XME has also been hurt by the decline of US coal demand (~20% of holdings). It is doubtful whether US coal demand will ever recover (bearish for railroads), but perhaps the miners will find overseas markets for coal. Full disclosure, I basically exchanged XME for FCX when FCX took a nose dive after revealing they would diversify into oil and gas. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why The S&amp;P 500 Will Likely Fall By 40%</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1144671/comments?source=feed#comment-14462661</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14462661</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/VXPl46'>http://bit.ly/VXPl46</a>~mmelvin/draft602.1.pdf<br/><br/>Buy mulitnational corporations.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 16:18:25 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/VXPl46'>http://bit.ly/VXPl46</a>~mmelvin/draft602.1.pdf<br/><br/>Buy mulitnational corporations.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why The S&amp;P 500 Will Likely Fall By 40%</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1144671/comments?source=feed#comment-14379691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14379691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Argentina's stock market doubled during their bond crisis.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:32:38 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Argentina's stock market doubled during their bond crisis.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why The S&amp;P 500 Will Likely Fall By 40%</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1144671/comments?source=feed#comment-14379431</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14379431</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[There is a serious shock coming in the bond markets. The realization that owning bonds, like real estate, or for that matter gold, is not &quot;risk-free&quot; will mean that at least on a relative basis, buyers of securities will be just as likely to desire stocks as any other asset class and a generational rotation into equities will result in outsized gains for those who got in early.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:25:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[There is a serious shock coming in the bond markets. The realization that owning bonds, like real estate, or for that matter gold, is not &quot;risk-free&quot; will mean that at least on a relative basis, buyers of securities will be just as likely to desire stocks as any other asset class and a generational rotation into equities will result in outsized gains for those who got in early.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Where Are We In The Secular Bear Market?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1102171/comments?source=feed#comment-13494581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13494581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I like your historical lens, but I would argue the pattern now (2000 - 2020) looks more like 1920 - 1940. A risky bubble (1929 = 2007), followed by crash (1932 = 2009) and 4 year bull market (1936 = 2013). Maybe some more shocks coming down the line in 2014, 2015 when the bond market implodes, but the mid - late 30's were a great time to invest for the long term, and some opportunities lead the market higher. <br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/MqNhPY'>http://bit.ly/MqNhPY</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 12:36:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I like your historical lens, but I would argue the pattern now (2000 - 2020) looks more like 1920 - 1940. A risky bubble (1929 = 2007), followed by crash (1932 = 2009) and 4 year bull market (1936 = 2013). Maybe some more shocks coming down the line in 2014, 2015 when the bond market implodes, but the mid - late 30's were a great time to invest for the long term, and some opportunities lead the market higher. <br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/MqNhPY'>http://bit.ly/MqNhPY</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: Listen To The Quiet</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1054131/comments?source=feed#comment-13205031</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13205031</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Two words: Revenue generation.<br/>Apple: 155 Billion USD in annual revenue.<br/>On the other hand, <br/>ExxonMobil: 452 Billion USD in annual revenue.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 01:10:38 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Two words: Revenue generation.<br/>Apple: 155 Billion USD in annual revenue.<br/>On the other hand, <br/>ExxonMobil: 452 Billion USD in annual revenue.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: Listen To The Quiet</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1054131/comments?source=feed#comment-12441631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12441631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[We are seeing something like the March 2008 cross: The stock reached a floor before the 50 day turned positive.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:35:51 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We are seeing something like the March 2008 cross: The stock reached a floor before the 50 day turned positive.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Freeport-McMoran Sees Oil &amp; Gas More Valuable Than Copper &amp; Gold</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1048591/comments?source=feed#comment-12334351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12334351</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Just because investors didn't want to be in the phone business, doesn't mean they should have sold Apple when they started selling iphones. I have to believe that Freeport looked around for companies to buy and decided they had enough copper-gold resources. Companies with very large copper-gold mines are highly dependent on the price of metal, not how much copper and gold they find each year. This allows Freeport to be more flexible in growing their business because a downturn in copper doesn't necessarily mean the cash dries up.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:12:18 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Just because investors didn't want to be in the phone business, doesn't mean they should have sold Apple when they started selling iphones. I have to believe that Freeport looked around for companies to buy and decided they had enough copper-gold resources. Companies with very large copper-gold mines are highly dependent on the price of metal, not how much copper and gold they find each year. This allows Freeport to be more flexible in growing their business because a downturn in copper doesn't necessarily mean the cash dries up.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3 Small-Cap Growth Industrial Tech Companies</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/879301/comments?source=feed#comment-11243541</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11243541</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[What if they were just early to the finishing line? Maybe there wasn't the same market for the product then as now?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:04:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What if they were just early to the finishing line? Maybe there wasn't the same market for the product then as now?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>David Einhorn: Yum Brands Vs. Chipotle</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/970071/comments?source=feed#comment-11170261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11170261</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I like YUM because they have KFC, which is the only American fast-food cuisine which has the correct branding to be popular in Asia and India. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:40:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I like YUM because they have KFC, which is the only American fast-food cuisine which has the correct branding to be popular in Asia and India. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>David Einhorn: Yum Brands Vs. Chipotle</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/970071/comments?source=feed#comment-11170101</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11170101</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Having a &quot;Cantina Menu&quot; isn't going to change the fact that Taco Bell still looks like a tele-tubby in colors and styling. It won't change that everyone knows that their food is as far from a plant or an animal product as you can find in the world and still be called edible. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:37:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Having a &quot;Cantina Menu&quot; isn't going to change the fact that Taco Bell still looks like a tele-tubby in colors and styling. It won't change that everyone knows that their food is as far from a plant or an animal product as you can find in the world and still be called edible. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>David Einhorn: Yum Brands Vs. Chipotle</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/970071/comments?source=feed#comment-11169831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11169831</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It has nothing to do with taste. It has to do with the fact that Chipotle is a not a fast food restaurant and not quite a substitute for full service restaurant chains. It is simply a really good food option in the $6-7 range.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:32:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It has nothing to do with taste. It has to do with the fact that Chipotle is a not a fast food restaurant and not quite a substitute for full service restaurant chains. It is simply a really good food option in the $6-7 range.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>David Einhorn: Yum Brands Vs. Chipotle</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/970071/comments?source=feed#comment-11138091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11138091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Caveat: Chipotle (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cmg' title='Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'>CMG</a>) has one third as many locations as Taco Bell (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yum' title='YUM! Brands, Inc.'>YUM</a>). That Chipotle has &quot;meager&quot; comp sales growth is a red herring because every time a new Chipotle restaurant opens, they are forever selling burritos as fast as they can wrap them. Really the only way to grow sales at a Chipotle restaurant is to have longer hours. Additionally, Taco Bell doesn't lose market share when a Chipotle opens: P.F. Chang's suffers. That's because a Chipotle burrito for $6.75 is a higher class product than P.F. Chang's business-professional-... $ 9 - 12 lunches. Oh, and that reminds me, CMG is opening Asian noodle houses too! This is not about Taco Bell. This is about the biggest growth story in retail store fronts besides Whole Foods Market. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:37:46 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Caveat: Chipotle (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cmg' title='Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'>CMG</a>) has one third as many locations as Taco Bell (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yum' title='YUM! Brands, Inc.'>YUM</a>). That Chipotle has &quot;meager&quot; comp sales growth is a red herring because every time a new Chipotle restaurant opens, they are forever selling burritos as fast as they can wrap them. Really the only way to grow sales at a Chipotle restaurant is to have longer hours. Additionally, Taco Bell doesn't lose market share when a Chipotle opens: P.F. Chang's suffers. That's because a Chipotle burrito for $6.75 is a higher class product than P.F. Chang's business-professional-... $ 9 - 12 lunches. Oh, and that reminds me, CMG is opening Asian noodle houses too! This is not about Taco Bell. This is about the biggest growth story in retail store fronts besides Whole Foods Market. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3 Small-Cap Growth Industrial Tech Companies</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/879301/comments?source=feed#comment-11111321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11111321</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Which one?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 03:47:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Which one?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Preferred Stock ETFs: The Downside That Preferred Stock Investors Can Avoid</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/312107/comments?source=feed#comment-10892271</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10892271</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I like the Market Vectors Preferred Securities ex-Financials ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pfxf' title='Market Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF'>PFXF</a>). As corporations have done quite well paying their debts through the financial crisis, and as all the toxic assets are held by banks, I like being able to invest in debt products that are not as correlated with interest rates as say, actual bonds, while at the same time avoiding exposure to the shaky financial sector.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:15:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I like the Market Vectors Preferred Securities ex-Financials ETF (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pfxf' title='Market Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF'>PFXF</a>). As corporations have done quite well paying their debts through the financial crisis, and as all the toxic assets are held by banks, I like being able to invest in debt products that are not as correlated with interest rates as say, actual bonds, while at the same time avoiding exposure to the shaky financial sector.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3 Small-Cap Growth Industrial Tech Companies</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/879301/comments?source=feed#comment-9677921</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9677921</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Correction: Future Fuel Corp (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ff' title='FutureFuel Corp.'>FF</a>)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:39:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Correction: Future Fuel Corp (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ff' title='FutureFuel Corp.'>FF</a>)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel: We Can See Why Berkshire Sold Its Intel Position</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/875061/comments?source=feed#comment-9621181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9621181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Also, Intel's large cap means it can buy any disruptive technology, while AMD will have more difficulty acquiring companies.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:35:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Also, Intel's large cap means it can buy any disruptive technology, while AMD will have more difficulty acquiring companies.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel: We Can See Why Berkshire Sold Its Intel Position</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/875061/comments?source=feed#comment-9620921</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9620921</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[AMD chips are inferior to Intel chips. It really doesn't matter what you think will happen to the PC. Processors will be used in increasingly more devices and requiring increasingly higher speeds. Intel is the world's largest maker of the world's fastest chips. Buying Intel is a pure play on the continued global explosion of digital technology.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:29:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[AMD chips are inferior to Intel chips. It really doesn't matter what you think will happen to the PC. Processors will be used in increasingly more devices and requiring increasingly higher speeds. Intel is the world's largest maker of the world's fastest chips. Buying Intel is a pure play on the continued global explosion of digital technology.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Money Printing Killed The S&amp;P</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/640261/comments?source=feed#comment-6239891</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6239891</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[So a follow up question: How would you change monetary policy to create the best environment for future growth?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 13:15:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[So a follow up question: How would you change monetary policy to create the best environment for future growth?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Money Printing Killed The S&amp;P</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/640261/comments?source=feed#comment-6239721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6239721</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Great discussion everyone. I especially appreciate the explanations from Symmetry Capital Mgmt and jhooper. I guess I agree with jhooper that what I am looking for is to remove the distorting effect of the government on the money supply, or that the solution to my complaint is not technical but political - yes fiat currencies are necessary, but they have been mismanaged.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 13:11:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Great discussion everyone. I especially appreciate the explanations from Symmetry Capital Mgmt and jhooper. I guess I agree with jhooper that what I am looking for is to remove the distorting effect of the government on the money supply, or that the solution to my complaint is not technical but political - yes fiat currencies are necessary, but they have been mismanaged.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Money Printing Killed The S&amp;P</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/640261/comments?source=feed#comment-6206461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6206461</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Unlimited? No way. There is at all times a finite global demand for cash. The premium paid for the cash is dependent on how secure the collateral for that cash is - something had to be traded. What that something is could be a basket of many things, but it is not simply created out of thin air.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:05:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Unlimited? No way. There is at all times a finite global demand for cash. The premium paid for the cash is dependent on how secure the collateral for that cash is - something had to be traded. What that something is could be a basket of many things, but it is not simply created out of thin air.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Money Printing Killed The S&amp;P</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/640261/comments?source=feed#comment-6203911</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6203911</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I should clarify that I do not advocate a gold standard, or any other central banking scheme. I advocate a market for currency that is not monopolized and manipulated by sovereign central banks. By a fixed base, I mean it is fixed by what you can trade for it. If you need more integers, you can print more notes, but its like a stock split.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:51:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I should clarify that I do not advocate a gold standard, or any other central banking scheme. I advocate a market for currency that is not monopolized and manipulated by sovereign central banks. By a fixed base, I mean it is fixed by what you can trade for it. If you need more integers, you can print more notes, but its like a stock split.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Money Printing Killed The S&amp;P</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/640261/comments?source=feed#comment-6200691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6200691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I understand that the Long and Great Depressions were caused by monetary tightening, which is not what I advocate either. I also understand that to grow financial contracts under a fixed monetary base requires price deflation of existing contracts, which would mean asset losses on a numeric basis, but I still believe that deflation of prices and increase in buying power of the underlying currency is a natural result of economic growth, and a good thing. If it is necessary for the financial side of the economy to have relatively fixed numeric prices, then surely there must be a way to deal with this efficiently, and retroactively, instead of setting inflation targets. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 11:47:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I understand that the Long and Great Depressions were caused by monetary tightening, which is not what I advocate either. I also understand that to grow financial contracts under a fixed monetary base requires price deflation of existing contracts, which would mean asset losses on a numeric basis, but I still believe that deflation of prices and increase in buying power of the underlying currency is a natural result of economic growth, and a good thing. If it is necessary for the financial side of the economy to have relatively fixed numeric prices, then surely there must be a way to deal with this efficiently, and retroactively, instead of setting inflation targets. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Money Printing Killed The S&amp;P</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/640261/comments?source=feed#comment-6173291</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6173291</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Right. But under a gold standard, my buying power would not decrease as a result of those deliveries. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 16:19:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Right. But under a gold standard, my buying power would not decrease as a result of those deliveries. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Money Printing Killed The S&amp;P</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/640261/comments?source=feed#comment-6170841</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6170841</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I look at cash because I don't know how to interpret what the Federal Reserve does with market manipulations through interest rates and buying their own debt and balance sheet changes and so on. There is some finite amount of tradeable monies in the world - monies not tied up in toxic systemic debt pyramids - and that is as good a measure as any for how much inflation there has been, because when that money was printed I never received a cent of it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 15:15:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I look at cash because I don't know how to interpret what the Federal Reserve does with market manipulations through interest rates and buying their own debt and balance sheet changes and so on. There is some finite amount of tradeable monies in the world - monies not tied up in toxic systemic debt pyramids - and that is as good a measure as any for how much inflation there has been, because when that money was printed I never received a cent of it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Money Printing Killed The S&amp;P</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/640261/comments?source=feed#comment-6170681</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6170681</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Like other comments have pointed out - equity is not real. Who can say what it is really worth?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 15:10:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Like other comments have pointed out - equity is not real. Who can say what it is really worth?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Money Printing Killed The S&amp;P</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/640261/comments?source=feed#comment-6170601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6170601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If cash is not the medium of transaction, then what the hell is?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 15:08:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If cash is not the medium of transaction, then what the hell is?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Money Printing Killed The S&amp;P</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/640261/comments?source=feed#comment-6170531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6170531</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Wages have doubled three times since 1970.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 15:08:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Wages have doubled three times since 1970.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
