<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Colin Lokey's Comments</title>
    <description>Colin Lokey's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/984857/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Former employees allege Bank of America (BAC) gave out cash bonuses and gift cards as rewards for denying loan applications and illegitimately modifying customers' files in order to make them "ineligible for loan modification," Bloomberg says. One "loss-mitigation specialist" claims staff were "regularly drilled &amp;hellip; to maximize fees &amp;hellip; by extending delay of the Home Affordable Modification Program process" by any available means. "At best, these attorneys are painting a false picture of the bank&amp;rsquo;s practices," a BAC spokesperson says dryly.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1086482?source=feed#comment-20012792</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">20012792</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The term &quot;dryly&quot;, as it is used here, simply means: &quot;In a matter-of-fact way.&quot; As such, use of the term is entirely appropriate and conveys nothing as to an editorial opinion regarding the truth or (un)truth of the former employees' accusations. They say &quot;yes&quot;, Bank of America says &quot;no.&quot; ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:04:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The term &quot;dryly&quot;, as it is used here, simply means: &quot;In a matter-of-fact way.&quot; As such, use of the term is entirely appropriate and conveys nothing as to an editorial opinion regarding the truth or (un)truth of the former employees' accusations. They say &quot;yes&quot;, Bank of America says &quot;no.&quot; ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Some details for Covidien's (COV) pharmaceuticals business spin-off (previous): Shareholders will receive one share of the new publicly traded company (Mallinckrodt) for every eight shares of COV they own. Mallinckrodt is expected to begin trading on the NYSE on July 1 (ticker: MNK). (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1045291?source=feed#comment-19219441</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19219441</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Correction was made on this MC. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:29:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Correction was made on this MC. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bernanke And The U.S. Taxpayer: Europe's Unsung Heroes</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1261961/comments?source=feed#comment-16157831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16157831</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I accidentally hit the &quot;like&quot; button on this comment. Ha. Thanks for reading.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:19:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I accidentally hit the &quot;like&quot; button on this comment. Ha. Thanks for reading.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bernanke And The U.S. Taxpayer: Europe's Unsung Heroes</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1261961/comments?source=feed#comment-16157731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16157731</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Great comment Mr. Fuller.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:16:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Great comment Mr. Fuller.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kabuki Theater: Analyzing Bernanke's Senate Testimony</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1230201/comments?source=feed#comment-15984171</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15984171</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Well, I mean I guess you can have your own estimates, but I mean you don't really need to estimate since the facts on it are readily available. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 12:01:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Well, I mean I guess you can have your own estimates, but I mean you don't really need to estimate since the facts on it are readily available. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kabuki Theater: Analyzing Bernanke's Senate Testimony</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1230201/comments?source=feed#comment-15978561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15978561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The chart is accurate. There's actually a video that goes with it which shows the progression over time. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 10:40:49 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The chart is accurate. There's actually a video that goes with it which shows the progression over time. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Bear Who Cried Wolf: Everything Is Fine Until It Isn't</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1223441/comments?source=feed#comment-15540621</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15540621</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I've discussed corporate buybacks at length elsewhere, most notably in the following article: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/Tdf2Cx'>http://bit.ly/Tdf2Cx</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:41:07 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I've discussed corporate buybacks at length elsewhere, most notably in the following article: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/Tdf2Cx'>http://bit.ly/Tdf2Cx</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Bear Who Cried Wolf: Everything Is Fine Until It Isn't</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1223441/comments?source=feed#comment-15525761</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15525761</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You are correct evan37]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:06:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You are correct evan37]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Heinz Acquisition Marred By Allegations Of Insider Trading</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1189851/comments?source=feed#comment-15505551</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15505551</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Someone has been reading ZeroHedge I see. Kudos to you. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:05:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Someone has been reading ZeroHedge I see. Kudos to you. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How the Fed Could Fix The Economy -- And Why It Hasn't</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1220301/comments?source=feed#comment-15474351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15474351</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Wait...what?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:35:56 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Wait...what?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Treasury Shorts, Negative Repo Rates, And The Poor Money Market Funds</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1210261/comments?source=feed#comment-15342461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15342461</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Also, for clarification, a &quot;special rate&quot; doesn't have to be negative]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:41:07 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Also, for clarification, a &quot;special rate&quot; doesn't have to be negative]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Treasury Shorts, Negative Repo Rates, And The Poor Money Market Funds</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1210261/comments?source=feed#comment-15335911</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15335911</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[There is a caveat here: traders are likely borrowing these specials from primary dealers who bid at special auctions to borrow from the Fed's SOMA portfolio...so the traders are a level removed from the Fed borrowing.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:07:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[There is a caveat here: traders are likely borrowing these specials from primary dealers who bid at special auctions to borrow from the Fed's SOMA portfolio...so the traders are a level removed from the Fed borrowing.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Treasury Shorts, Negative Repo Rates, And The Poor Money Market Funds</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1210261/comments?source=feed#comment-15306101</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15306101</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Probably not in money market funds]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:16:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Probably not in money market funds]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Hyperinflation Is No Myth: The Shadow Banking Component</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1177051/comments?source=feed#comment-14938201</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14938201</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I really cannot stress enough that the important takeaway here is about shadow banking... I'm not sure people are getting that. Anyway, thanks for reading]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:23:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I really cannot stress enough that the important takeaway here is about shadow banking... I'm not sure people are getting that. Anyway, thanks for reading]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Hyperinflation Is No Myth: The Shadow Banking Component</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1177051/comments?source=feed#comment-14933871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14933871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I am not one of the Tylers, I have a contributor page which you can peruse: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/12yGyZL'>http://bit.ly/12yGyZL</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:06:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I am not one of the Tylers, I have a contributor page which you can peruse: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/12yGyZL'>http://bit.ly/12yGyZL</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>InterOil: Asset Sell-Down Or 100% Takeover?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1174841/comments?source=feed#comment-14933681</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14933681</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I sure did. And I still believe that the company is worth nearly nothing. A short position that doesn't pay in a year is no different than a long position that doesn't immediately go up. Things take time to play out. Bad timing is different from a flawed thesis. As anyone who knows the history of this company is no doubt fully aware, I am certainly not alone in my skepticism. That said, I have no positions whatsoever now. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:01:58 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I sure did. And I still believe that the company is worth nearly nothing. A short position that doesn't pay in a year is no different than a long position that doesn't immediately go up. Things take time to play out. Bad timing is different from a flawed thesis. As anyone who knows the history of this company is no doubt fully aware, I am certainly not alone in my skepticism. That said, I have no positions whatsoever now. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Hyperinflation Is No Myth: The Shadow Banking Component</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1177051/comments?source=feed#comment-14930101</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14930101</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think this deserves a re-read if you don't understand the danger of substituting depositless credit creation with deposit dependent credit creation. That is the point of this piece. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:47:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think this deserves a re-read if you don't understand the danger of substituting depositless credit creation with deposit dependent credit creation. That is the point of this piece. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>InterOil: Asset Sell-Down Or 100% Takeover?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1174841/comments?source=feed#comment-14903581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14903581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[And by the way, you're unquestionably right that it isn't always wise to be a cynic...but, it is ALWAYS fashionable to be a cynic. HaHa Best of luck.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:36:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[And by the way, you're unquestionably right that it isn't always wise to be a cynic...but, it is ALWAYS fashionable to be a cynic. HaHa Best of luck.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>InterOil: Asset Sell-Down Or 100% Takeover?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1174841/comments?source=feed#comment-14903541</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14903541</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I promise to recant any and all criticism in the event IOC ever proves itself. I'm not in the business of doubting companies for no reason and I have no positions in IOC of any kind. I like to see people make money so if this works out, that's fantastic for shareholders. I have just heard a lot of promises over the years about IOC and none of them ever seem to materialize. So I don't think it's unreasonable to be a bit skeptical. Additionally, I think Herbalife shareholders would take exception to a comparison with IOC in the same way you have taken exception to a comparison with Herbalife. They would probably say &quot;Hey, at least we have a product.&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:34:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I promise to recant any and all criticism in the event IOC ever proves itself. I'm not in the business of doubting companies for no reason and I have no positions in IOC of any kind. I like to see people make money so if this works out, that's fantastic for shareholders. I have just heard a lot of promises over the years about IOC and none of them ever seem to materialize. So I don't think it's unreasonable to be a bit skeptical. Additionally, I think Herbalife shareholders would take exception to a comparison with IOC in the same way you have taken exception to a comparison with Herbalife. They would probably say &quot;Hey, at least we have a product.&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>InterOil: Asset Sell-Down Or 100% Takeover?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1174841/comments?source=feed#comment-14896951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14896951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;InterOil to get buyout offer of $452.77 per share&quot; from Chevron... kind of like: &quot;Herbalife to get buyout offer of $250 per share from Wal-Mart.&quot; Imagine Dr. Evil with pinky to his lips... &quot;If you want InterOil and its hypothetical reserves, you're going to have to pay us....One milllllllion dollars..sorry...one hundred billion dollars!!!&quot; <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/VRdWgN'>http://bit.ly/VRdWgN</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:27:50 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;InterOil to get buyout offer of $452.77 per share&quot; from Chevron... kind of like: &quot;Herbalife to get buyout offer of $250 per share from Wal-Mart.&quot; Imagine Dr. Evil with pinky to his lips... &quot;If you want InterOil and its hypothetical reserves, you're going to have to pay us....One milllllllion dollars..sorry...one hundred billion dollars!!!&quot; <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/VRdWgN'>http://bit.ly/VRdWgN</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alchemy, Systemic Risk, And A Trip Down The Shadow Banking Rabbit Hole</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1174251/comments?source=feed#comment-14894661</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14894661</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Not sure I see how that works in the aggregate to expand M2 or reserves. I can't see how M2 expands unless the Fed prints...&quot;<br/><br/>The Fed is printing. <br/><br/>&quot;Another point that I need to connect the dots on as well - this shadow contraction suggests an exit from bonds and/or stocks by banks to some degree which suggests these banks are seeing unacceptable risks in these assets.&quot;<br/><br/>Well, unless they use their new fungible Bernanke bucks to purchase high quality assets like Treasuries which they can then fund in repo and come out smelling like a rose with cash in hand (which they use to bid up risk assets) and Treasuries still on the books. As long as the pledged assets aren't repledged, the collateral multiplier can still contract while risk assets are bid up.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:45:42 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Not sure I see how that works in the aggregate to expand M2 or reserves. I can't see how M2 expands unless the Fed prints...&quot;<br/><br/>The Fed is printing. <br/><br/>&quot;Another point that I need to connect the dots on as well - this shadow contraction suggests an exit from bonds and/or stocks by banks to some degree which suggests these banks are seeing unacceptable risks in these assets.&quot;<br/><br/>Well, unless they use their new fungible Bernanke bucks to purchase high quality assets like Treasuries which they can then fund in repo and come out smelling like a rose with cash in hand (which they use to bid up risk assets) and Treasuries still on the books. As long as the pledged assets aren't repledged, the collateral multiplier can still contract while risk assets are bid up.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Hyperinflation Is A Myth (And What It Means For Gold Prices)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1174331/comments?source=feed#comment-14884001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14884001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Let me clarify: the shadow banking system serves as an inflation buffer when it is expanding because it is depositless. It creates credit without the attendant deposits which can spill over into the actual economy. As the Fed is forced to offset the contraction in shadow banking with an expansion of M2, it is drastically increasing the risk of inflation. The only thing keeping this at bay is, as you say, all time lows in the velocity of money. However, it isn't clear that the Fed or really anyone else understands the important role shadow banking's depositless credit creation plays in keeping inflation at bay. If the shift continues to move towards stimulating credit creation via the expansion of M2 and away from depositless credit creation via shadow banking, inflation will explode without warning without the shadow banking buffer.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:32:54 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Let me clarify: the shadow banking system serves as an inflation buffer when it is expanding because it is depositless. It creates credit without the attendant deposits which can spill over into the actual economy. As the Fed is forced to offset the contraction in shadow banking with an expansion of M2, it is drastically increasing the risk of inflation. The only thing keeping this at bay is, as you say, all time lows in the velocity of money. However, it isn't clear that the Fed or really anyone else understands the important role shadow banking's depositless credit creation plays in keeping inflation at bay. If the shift continues to move towards stimulating credit creation via the expansion of M2 and away from depositless credit creation via shadow banking, inflation will explode without warning without the shadow banking buffer.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alchemy, Systemic Risk, And A Trip Down The Shadow Banking Rabbit Hole</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1174251/comments?source=feed#comment-14883381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14883381</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hey Joseph,<br/>     Ok so here, in short, is how this works: the shadow banking system is depositless as it were. It is self contained and despite all the shadow credit creation, there is no actual cash that can spill over into the &quot;real world.&quot; So the more credit that is created without deposits, the more of an inflation buffer exists. However, now that the shadow baking credit creation machine is contracting, it is being gradually replaced by excess reserves and real deposits which of course are real money which can spill out into the economy. So, you have a shift away from inflation-resistant shadow banking credit creation and towards inflation-prone M2-fueled credit creation. If banks finally start making loans, this will be an inflationary nightmare. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:21:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hey Joseph,<br/>     Ok so here, in short, is how this works: the shadow banking system is depositless as it were. It is self contained and despite all the shadow credit creation, there is no actual cash that can spill over into the &quot;real world.&quot; So the more credit that is created without deposits, the more of an inflation buffer exists. However, now that the shadow baking credit creation machine is contracting, it is being gradually replaced by excess reserves and real deposits which of course are real money which can spill out into the economy. So, you have a shift away from inflation-resistant shadow banking credit creation and towards inflation-prone M2-fueled credit creation. If banks finally start making loans, this will be an inflationary nightmare. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Hyperinflation Is A Myth (And What It Means For Gold Prices)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1174331/comments?source=feed#comment-14882591</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14882591</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I have to agree... CPI numbers are bogus.. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:06:32 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I have to agree... CPI numbers are bogus.. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Hyperinflation Is A Myth (And What It Means For Gold Prices)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1174331/comments?source=feed#comment-14882511</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14882511</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[What about the $100 billion per month contraction in shadow banking... What happens to inflation when the velocity of collateral picks back up... There is another dynamic at play here in shadow banking that has an enormous effect on keeping inflation subdued. See my article: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/p623'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:04:52 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What about the $100 billion per month contraction in shadow banking... What happens to inflation when the velocity of collateral picks back up... There is another dynamic at play here in shadow banking that has an enormous effect on keeping inflation subdued. See my article: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/p623'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dow 14,000: Are You The Sucker?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1159311/comments?source=feed#comment-14668541</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14668541</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I hope somebody besides me gets that Larry David reference! I love CYE ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:22:35 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I hope somebody besides me gets that Larry David reference! I love CYE ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dow 14,000: Are You The Sucker?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1159311/comments?source=feed#comment-14652221</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14652221</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[daro: I can only assume that is what yv204's comment was referring to. Of course the point is that upward revisions make the current report look relatively weaker. This really isn't a disputable point as it is a point about perception not about statistics. Here's an example: Let's say I'm on a weight loss program and once a month I weigh myself on a cheap scale. That cheap scale says I lost 16 pounds in November and 14 pounds in December. I also get to weigh myself on a more accurate, expensive scale but I don't get those readings until later. I weigh myself on the cheap scale in January and it says I lost 15 pounds during the month. I'm feeling really good about myself until I find out that according to the more accurate scales I lost 24 pounds in November and 20 in December. Obviously, the perception is going to be (at least for the time being) that my weight loss program got off track in January (15 pounds doesn't look nearly as good as 20 or 24 if you're trying to lose weight). Maybe I'll be happier when I get the reading from the more accurate scale...but maybe not. For instance, have a look at this chart: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/XVM4lN'>http://bit.ly/XVM4lN</a><br/>That shows revisions versus pre-revision non-farm payrolls. There is no guarantee that revisions will be positive. Thanks as always for reading and taking the time to comment.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 12:20:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[daro: I can only assume that is what yv204's comment was referring to. Of course the point is that upward revisions make the current report look relatively weaker. This really isn't a disputable point as it is a point about perception not about statistics. Here's an example: Let's say I'm on a weight loss program and once a month I weigh myself on a cheap scale. That cheap scale says I lost 16 pounds in November and 14 pounds in December. I also get to weigh myself on a more accurate, expensive scale but I don't get those readings until later. I weigh myself on the cheap scale in January and it says I lost 15 pounds during the month. I'm feeling really good about myself until I find out that according to the more accurate scales I lost 24 pounds in November and 20 in December. Obviously, the perception is going to be (at least for the time being) that my weight loss program got off track in January (15 pounds doesn't look nearly as good as 20 or 24 if you're trying to lose weight). Maybe I'll be happier when I get the reading from the more accurate scale...but maybe not. For instance, have a look at this chart: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/XVM4lN'>http://bit.ly/XVM4lN</a><br/>That shows revisions versus pre-revision non-farm payrolls. There is no guarantee that revisions will be positive. Thanks as always for reading and taking the time to comment.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dow 14,000: Are You The Sucker?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1159311/comments?source=feed#comment-14651161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14651161</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I see. I guess David Rosenberg doesn't understand either:<br/><br/>&quot;Let's not forget that the 157k headline print was below consensus and 22% lower than the 201k average of the prior three months. That's the problem with upside revisions — they go on to exaggerate the slowdown.&quot;<br/><br/>You should really let him know what you know about how economic reports are put together that he and I seem to be missing. He'd probably be quite interested given that he was the chief economist for Merrill Lynch for the better part of a decade and was ranked the most accurate forecaster for 2011 by MSNBC.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 12:05:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I see. I guess David Rosenberg doesn't understand either:<br/><br/>&quot;Let's not forget that the 157k headline print was below consensus and 22% lower than the 201k average of the prior three months. That's the problem with upside revisions — they go on to exaggerate the slowdown.&quot;<br/><br/>You should really let him know what you know about how economic reports are put together that he and I seem to be missing. He'd probably be quite interested given that he was the chief economist for Merrill Lynch for the better part of a decade and was ranked the most accurate forecaster for 2011 by MSNBC.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dow 14,000: Are You The Sucker?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1159311/comments?source=feed#comment-14647321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14647321</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Growth is +4% nominal&quot; <br/><br/>You should check that data point for the fourth quarter.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 10:51:59 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Growth is +4% nominal&quot; <br/><br/>You should check that data point for the fourth quarter.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reality Bites: Economy Begins To Shrink As Fed Goes Broke</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1145711/comments?source=feed#comment-14414061</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14414061</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Ah, I see. We need to define 'bank.' Again, it isn't clear you read my response pieces. But in any case, I suggest you look up which banks make markets in stocks and which banks serve as underwriters. Then ask yourself, given the number of deposit taking institutions with market making operations, how does one truly track where the money goes? Is a dollar not a dollar? Are excess deposits separated by a magical &quot;Chinese Wall?&quot; Does Goldman not have $50 billion in deposits? Are Goldman and Morgan not 'bank holding companies?' How about JPMorgan and its role as a custodial bank? Where are the lines drawn? And can you really say with all the blurred lines and gray areas that it is strictly a coincidence that stocks have risen with excess deposits? Sorry but that will be my last comment on this issue. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:08:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Ah, I see. We need to define 'bank.' Again, it isn't clear you read my response pieces. But in any case, I suggest you look up which banks make markets in stocks and which banks serve as underwriters. Then ask yourself, given the number of deposit taking institutions with market making operations, how does one truly track where the money goes? Is a dollar not a dollar? Are excess deposits separated by a magical &quot;Chinese Wall?&quot; Does Goldman not have $50 billion in deposits? Are Goldman and Morgan not 'bank holding companies?' How about JPMorgan and its role as a custodial bank? Where are the lines drawn? And can you really say with all the blurred lines and gray areas that it is strictly a coincidence that stocks have risen with excess deposits? Sorry but that will be my last comment on this issue. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
