Seeking Alpha

ytterbius » Comments » CSIQ

  • China Solar Safari: Hunting for Five Value Companies [View article]
    BryBry, you should do more research before you blindly follow Jim Cramer in his FSLR right off the road and into the ditch. FSLR is in trouble, only the same analysts that love to put sell ratings on Silicon-based technology continue to refuse to talk about the real issue for FSLR, which is their dependence on Tellurium.
    Aug 10 16:03 pm |Rating: +3 0 |Link to Comment
  • Solar's Warm, But Not Hot - Barron's [View article]
    CLH - We're very close to parity right now in some place, like Italy. If the Asian Economies continue to grow and to increase demand for Oil and Coal, then Grid Parity will rise, just as manufacturing costs of Solar (and Wind) are decreasing. This is not to mention Climate Change responses like Cap and Trade, etc. Emitting Carbon is going to get very expensive soon.
    Jul 20 17:52 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Solar's Warm, But Not Hot - Barron's [View article]
    Sorry "to FSLR is producing their own poly at $35/kg next year?" = "to FSLR, when LDK is producing their own poly at $35/kg next year?"
    Jul 20 15:58 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Solar's Warm, But Not Hot - Barron's [View article]
    Oh, and BTW:

    Under FSLR, you have the following claim:

    "It is not exposed to poly pricing, because it uses cadmium telluride, which produces cheaper electricity than poly prices and will continue to until poly hits $70/kg."

    If $70/kg is the parity point, then what happens to FSLR is producing their own poly at $35/kg next year? LOL!

    Tellurium will get more expensive, while at the same time Silicon will be getting cheaper, and the efficiency in the use of Silicon will be increasing, not only as Silicon-based thin-film takes off (See AMAT), but as wafer-makers are cutting them thinner, and wasting less in the process.
    Jul 20 15:57 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Solar's Warm, But Not Hot - Barron's [View article]
    Eli, you don't mention your positions on any of these companies.

    Based on previous articles you've written, I'd gather that you're short as hell on the Industry.

    As for your link to Barrons, I won't be subscribing, so I can't argue any specific points of FUD that they might be passing on. In any case, Barrons has already done a number on their credibility on Solar, since Bill Alpert completely blew it on LDK Solar.
    Jul 20 15:41 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on CSIQ by ytterbius
Comments by Ticker
ytterbius'
Comments Stats
31 comments
Rating: 5 (8 - 3 )