<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>vmyev's Comments</title>
    <description>vmyev's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/986278/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>2 Strategies Solar Is Fighting Over - Which Will Win?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1456701/comments?source=feed#comment-19201371</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19201371</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[After &quot;considering&quot; solar for the last decade, I bought an on-grid system from SolarCity last week.<br/>- my average monthly electricity bill will fall from $150 to $98<br/>- the system has a full 20 year warranty<br/>- no upfront cash outlay<br/>- constant remote monitoring of the system<br/><br/>As a consumer, I agree with Mr. Rive's statement - I don't care whose panels they are or what the technology is as long as they keep working as advertised.  Although I think SCTY has gotten a bit ahead of itself, I believe this is the solar stock to own in the long term because of their business philosophy and Elon Musk's leadership.  Now I'm just waiting for Mr. Musk to come up with an affordable EV.  If the lease terms are similar to my solar system - free transportation!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:08:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[After &quot;considering&quot; solar for the last decade, I bought an on-grid system from SolarCity last week.<br/>- my average monthly electricity bill will fall from $150 to $98<br/>- the system has a full 20 year warranty<br/>- no upfront cash outlay<br/>- constant remote monitoring of the system<br/><br/>As a consumer, I agree with Mr. Rive's statement - I don't care whose panels they are or what the technology is as long as they keep working as advertised.  Although I think SCTY has gotten a bit ahead of itself, I believe this is the solar stock to own in the long term because of their business philosophy and Elon Musk's leadership.  Now I'm just waiting for Mr. Musk to come up with an affordable EV.  If the lease terms are similar to my solar system - free transportation!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Amazon Is Way Too Risky For Your Portfolio</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/892561/comments?source=feed#comment-9955231</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9955231</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Seems to me Amazon is playing a very risky game in their core business, e-retail.  I see Walmart as the sleeping giant that Amazon keeps poking at.  The first of many possible future reactions was the removal of Kindles.  Walmart already has warehousing around all cities and most rural areas and a state-of-the-art distribution network, all of which Amazon is desperately trying to build up.  What would it take for Walmart to attack Amazon in e-commerce?  Probably little more than a marketing and ad campaign.  Pay <br/>Google some more so that searches always present Walmart ahead of Amazon, clean up the website a bit, email weekly promotions, focus on local service and support for big-ticket items, etc. - wouldn't take much to get everyone's attention.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 02:41:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Seems to me Amazon is playing a very risky game in their core business, e-retail.  I see Walmart as the sleeping giant that Amazon keeps poking at.  The first of many possible future reactions was the removal of Kindles.  Walmart already has warehousing around all cities and most rural areas and a state-of-the-art distribution network, all of which Amazon is desperately trying to build up.  What would it take for Walmart to attack Amazon in e-commerce?  Probably little more than a marketing and ad campaign.  Pay <br/>Google some more so that searches always present Walmart ahead of Amazon, clean up the website a bit, email weekly promotions, focus on local service and support for big-ticket items, etc. - wouldn't take much to get everyone's attention.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Fiscal Cliff: QE Slayer</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/882171/comments?source=feed#comment-9759521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9759521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Last night I watched a session of the House Armed Services Committee taking testimony from high ranking military and DOD leaders on &quot;sequestration,&quot; which is the formal term for the fiscal cliff.  What amazed me was the relatively nonchalant attitude of the few (probably fewer than 20) House members versus the obviously concerned attitude of over 100 DOD members.  <br/><br/>The military/DOD said that there is no logical, reasonable way to do this - over 9600 contracts, including some multi-billion dollar ones, would have to be re-negotiated, affecting almost every corner of our economy.<br/><br/>The House committee members replied that it's not their fault - the House is doing its job in trying to find a solution, but the Senate and Administration are the culprits!  ... and it's too late to do anything before the elections anyway because we go on recess tomorrow!!!<br/><br/>There you have it!  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:17:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Last night I watched a session of the House Armed Services Committee taking testimony from high ranking military and DOD leaders on &quot;sequestration,&quot; which is the formal term for the fiscal cliff.  What amazed me was the relatively nonchalant attitude of the few (probably fewer than 20) House members versus the obviously concerned attitude of over 100 DOD members.  <br/><br/>The military/DOD said that there is no logical, reasonable way to do this - over 9600 contracts, including some multi-billion dollar ones, would have to be re-negotiated, affecting almost every corner of our economy.<br/><br/>The House committee members replied that it's not their fault - the House is doing its job in trying to find a solution, but the Senate and Administration are the culprits!  ... and it's too late to do anything before the elections anyway because we go on recess tomorrow!!!<br/><br/>There you have it!  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sell Amazon - Even The New Kindle Doesn't Warrant Sky-High Valuations</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/866291/comments?source=feed#comment-9437141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9437141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[$vix, I don't believe in any of these conspiracy theories about WS supporting their buddy Bezos or &quot;manipulation.&quot;  It's all about money, and if they could make it shorting AMZN, they would turn around in a flash.  I agree with the author's thesis - for right now, being long AMZN is the way to make money, regardless of logic, fundamentals or outcries from AMZN shorts.  Kind of reminds me of when I was a newbie salesman for IBM in the mid-70s.  IBM owned the hardware market at that time.  Their success was due to the fact they had people believing that, even though IBM might not be the best choice, it was never the wrong choice!<br/><br/>For AMZN to drop seriously, there has to be a crack in the dike.  Bad earnings or rising PE obviously won't do it - when they announced lower Q2 earnings and forecast a loss for Q3, the price shot up and stayed up.  I'm afraid that if they post a Q3 loss but beat reduced expectations, the price will once again take off!  <br/><br/>Perhaps the &quot;crack&quot; is Goldman's removal of AMZN from its basket of preferred stocks, which is essentially a downgrade.  If other analysts follow with downgrades on valuation, I think the &quot;hedge-herd&quot; will quickly head for the exits.  But unless this happens within the next week or so, fund window-dressing will probably push the price up even further.<br/><br/>I'm short AMZN via puts (probably way to many!)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 03:04:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[$vix, I don't believe in any of these conspiracy theories about WS supporting their buddy Bezos or &quot;manipulation.&quot;  It's all about money, and if they could make it shorting AMZN, they would turn around in a flash.  I agree with the author's thesis - for right now, being long AMZN is the way to make money, regardless of logic, fundamentals or outcries from AMZN shorts.  Kind of reminds me of when I was a newbie salesman for IBM in the mid-70s.  IBM owned the hardware market at that time.  Their success was due to the fact they had people believing that, even though IBM might not be the best choice, it was never the wrong choice!<br/><br/>For AMZN to drop seriously, there has to be a crack in the dike.  Bad earnings or rising PE obviously won't do it - when they announced lower Q2 earnings and forecast a loss for Q3, the price shot up and stayed up.  I'm afraid that if they post a Q3 loss but beat reduced expectations, the price will once again take off!  <br/><br/>Perhaps the &quot;crack&quot; is Goldman's removal of AMZN from its basket of preferred stocks, which is essentially a downgrade.  If other analysts follow with downgrades on valuation, I think the &quot;hedge-herd&quot; will quickly head for the exits.  But unless this happens within the next week or so, fund window-dressing will probably push the price up even further.<br/><br/>I'm short AMZN via puts (probably way to many!)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Amazon Doesn't Want To Be More Like Apple, It Wants To Be More Like Amazon.com</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/856031/comments?source=feed#comment-9265141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9265141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think there's another angle to these new Kindles and that's advertising and marketing.  What do Americans do best? - innovate (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) and market (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn' title='Amazon.com, Inc.'>AMZN</a>).  Marketing is getting you to buy something you didn't know you needed, and this is done through advertising.  But we're bombarded with so many ads, we subconsciously turn them off - UNLESS they are relevant to us.  Who would have thought Google could make money off of advertising, but they made the ads relevant to their users.  A couple of years ago I noticed that when I sent or read emails in my gmail account, ads appeared which were related to keywords in my text!  So, an adbot in real time sends me what I am more likely to pay attention to.<br/><br/>Amazon has also been using Google Search to promote itself.  Try googling something you want to buy.  The search may come back with 23 million hits, but Amazon will always be on the first page.  Whatever Amazon pays for that service is worth it - most of us don't go past the first couple of pages.<br/><br/>Now, suppose the Kindle becomes your favorite device, with all your movies, books, music, etc. on it.  Although it sounds like a conspiracy theory, I would guess that Amazon Marketing would have access to all the information it can derive from knowing what's on your Kindle, and can customize the &quot;Special Offers&quot; for you.  They've gotten you to pay for a device which gives them a conduit to your brain, and probably charge their advertisers a premium for such directed ads!  Brilliant!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 04:55:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think there's another angle to these new Kindles and that's advertising and marketing.  What do Americans do best? - innovate (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) and market (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn' title='Amazon.com, Inc.'>AMZN</a>).  Marketing is getting you to buy something you didn't know you needed, and this is done through advertising.  But we're bombarded with so many ads, we subconsciously turn them off - UNLESS they are relevant to us.  Who would have thought Google could make money off of advertising, but they made the ads relevant to their users.  A couple of years ago I noticed that when I sent or read emails in my gmail account, ads appeared which were related to keywords in my text!  So, an adbot in real time sends me what I am more likely to pay attention to.<br/><br/>Amazon has also been using Google Search to promote itself.  Try googling something you want to buy.  The search may come back with 23 million hits, but Amazon will always be on the first page.  Whatever Amazon pays for that service is worth it - most of us don't go past the first couple of pages.<br/><br/>Now, suppose the Kindle becomes your favorite device, with all your movies, books, music, etc. on it.  Although it sounds like a conspiracy theory, I would guess that Amazon Marketing would have access to all the information it can derive from knowing what's on your Kindle, and can customize the &quot;Special Offers&quot; for you.  They've gotten you to pay for a device which gives them a conduit to your brain, and probably charge their advertisers a premium for such directed ads!  Brilliant!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Amazon: Putting In A Little Irrationality</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/822421/comments?source=feed#comment-8760541</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8760541</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Paulo, back to the original irrationality theme:  AMZN's price has been pushed up this week due to rumors of multiple Kindles and even a smartphone hitting the market soon.  Seems to me the best companies stick to their core businesses.  The first Kindle Fire may have been that, but it's successors plus the smartphone seem to be efforts to compete head-on in an ever more competitive market.  The market seems to be cheering these efforts, but I can't see how these new products will do anything but increase costs.<br/><br/>Thoughts?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 03:42:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Paulo, back to the original irrationality theme:  AMZN's price has been pushed up this week due to rumors of multiple Kindles and even a smartphone hitting the market soon.  Seems to me the best companies stick to their core businesses.  The first Kindle Fire may have been that, but it's successors plus the smartphone seem to be efforts to compete head-on in an ever more competitive market.  The market seems to be cheering these efforts, but I can't see how these new products will do anything but increase costs.<br/><br/>Thoughts?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>6 Healthcare Stocks With Pending August Catalysts</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/769151/comments?source=feed#comment-8011191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8011191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks yazzbro, good comments.  I've done well with ARNA, VVUS, HZNP and AMRN selling far OTM (30-50%) puts and calls just before the FDA decision, capitalizing on the soaring IV.  However, with HZNP and AMRN I have to wait until August options expiration on the 17th or leave a lot of money on the table.  I got out of my HZNP $5 short puts just before its price collapsed, but I'm still holding a lot of AMRN $9 and $10 short puts I was getting very nervous about.<br/><br/>As for AMRN insiders selling stock, there are obviously lots of reasons for execs to sell, most of them having nothing to do with company prospects.  Here's a note from yesterday's <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/MSp6gL'>http://bit.ly/MSp6gL</a><br/><br/>&quot;Amarin (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amrn' title='Amarin Corporation PLC'>AMRN</a>): An investor bought 13,150 January 18 calls for $1.55 and sold a matching number of January 25 calls for $0.40. Known as a bullish call spread, the trade cost $1.15 and will earn a maximum profit of about 500 percent if the stock rallies to $25 by expiration. AMRN fell 9.12 percent to $11.53.&quot;<br/><br/>Suppose an exec sold 100,000 shares for about $1.2 million and entered this trade.  That would be a tremendous sign of confidence in the company's future, but something we retail investors would never see.  All we see is the insider sale of 100,000 shares!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 00:30:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks yazzbro, good comments.  I've done well with ARNA, VVUS, HZNP and AMRN selling far OTM (30-50%) puts and calls just before the FDA decision, capitalizing on the soaring IV.  However, with HZNP and AMRN I have to wait until August options expiration on the 17th or leave a lot of money on the table.  I got out of my HZNP $5 short puts just before its price collapsed, but I'm still holding a lot of AMRN $9 and $10 short puts I was getting very nervous about.<br/><br/>As for AMRN insiders selling stock, there are obviously lots of reasons for execs to sell, most of them having nothing to do with company prospects.  Here's a note from yesterday's <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/MSp6gL'>http://bit.ly/MSp6gL</a><br/><br/>&quot;Amarin (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amrn' title='Amarin Corporation PLC'>AMRN</a>): An investor bought 13,150 January 18 calls for $1.55 and sold a matching number of January 25 calls for $0.40. Known as a bullish call spread, the trade cost $1.15 and will earn a maximum profit of about 500 percent if the stock rallies to $25 by expiration. AMRN fell 9.12 percent to $11.53.&quot;<br/><br/>Suppose an exec sold 100,000 shares for about $1.2 million and entered this trade.  That would be a tremendous sign of confidence in the company's future, but something we retail investors would never see.  All we see is the insider sale of 100,000 shares!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Arena Pharmaceuticals Weight Loss Drug Lorcasersin Approved By The FDA</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/687981/comments?source=feed#comment-6873731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6873731</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Douche - yours is probably the most intelligent comment I've seen on ARNA, mainly because it agrees with my own point of view :)  Obesity, like smoking, is, for the vast majority of people, a voluntary and self-inflicted problem.  Despite many possible remedies, obese people choose to remain obese.  Sure, it's easy to blame the problem on commercials, fast food, big portions, your mother, etc., but it's really a matter of will.  The latest &quot;magic pill&quot; is no more than another fad.  I agree sales will probably spike initially, but as people realize they still have to do the exercise and diet thing, which they should have been doing all along, they will give up.<br/><br/>As for making money on the stock, I have to admit I got really lucky Wednesday morning.  I am a long-time options trader and was amazed when I looked at the IVs on the June 29 puts and calls - 600-700, higher than I have seen anywhere anytime!  With ARNA trading just below 9 at the time, I guessed that it might move 50% up or down and sold puts at 3, 4, and 5 strikes and calls at 13, 14, and 15 strikes.  Admittedly a big risk if ARNA took off like some thought it might, but it now looks like all my options will expire worthless.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:01:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Douche - yours is probably the most intelligent comment I've seen on ARNA, mainly because it agrees with my own point of view :)  Obesity, like smoking, is, for the vast majority of people, a voluntary and self-inflicted problem.  Despite many possible remedies, obese people choose to remain obese.  Sure, it's easy to blame the problem on commercials, fast food, big portions, your mother, etc., but it's really a matter of will.  The latest &quot;magic pill&quot; is no more than another fad.  I agree sales will probably spike initially, but as people realize they still have to do the exercise and diet thing, which they should have been doing all along, they will give up.<br/><br/>As for making money on the stock, I have to admit I got really lucky Wednesday morning.  I am a long-time options trader and was amazed when I looked at the IVs on the June 29 puts and calls - 600-700, higher than I have seen anywhere anytime!  With ARNA trading just below 9 at the time, I guessed that it might move 50% up or down and sold puts at 3, 4, and 5 strikes and calls at 13, 14, and 15 strikes.  Admittedly a big risk if ARNA took off like some thought it might, but it now looks like all my options will expire worthless.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The first reviews for the Tesla (TSLA) Model S start to pour in, largely on the positive side. The electric vehicle boasts impressive acceleration, a smooth ride, and a massive infotainment system chock full of delights, according to the writers. With demand for the model uncertain, and its success seen as an all-or-nothing watershed moment for the company, early buzz on the car is viewed as critical. (Reviews: Engadget, Motor Trend, Wired, CNET)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/382661?source=feed#comment-6737631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6737631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Our society moves forward as the result of competing technologies - EV, nat gas, hydrogen, new ICE innovations, nuclear, warp drive, whatever. Maybe one will emerge the clear leader, maybe not, but I believe we will all benefit in the long run from the competition, subsidized by government or not.  One area that has received little attention is the weight of the vehicle.  To take my 170 pound body to the grocery store, I need to surround myself with 1 1/2 tons of steel, rubber and plastic.  Replacing steel in vehicles with graphite composites could improve gas mileage especially in cities, but suggesting we kill our steel and coal industries would probably not gain much support from the government!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:02:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Our society moves forward as the result of competing technologies - EV, nat gas, hydrogen, new ICE innovations, nuclear, warp drive, whatever. Maybe one will emerge the clear leader, maybe not, but I believe we will all benefit in the long run from the competition, subsidized by government or not.  One area that has received little attention is the weight of the vehicle.  To take my 170 pound body to the grocery store, I need to surround myself with 1 1/2 tons of steel, rubber and plastic.  Replacing steel in vehicles with graphite composites could improve gas mileage especially in cities, but suggesting we kill our steel and coal industries would probably not gain much support from the government!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If You Own This Tech Giant, Then It May Be Time To Sell</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/635241/comments?source=feed#comment-6115441</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6115441</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think the larger B&amp;M stores like WalMart and Target will sharpen their pencils, beef up their on-line capabilities, and sell the advantages of buying local.<br/><br/>Amazon's future growth is totally dependent on the on-line consumer, a really fickle and non-loyal SOB, like me!  For stuff I buy regularly, I stick with brands I can trust and with a few clicks can get the best price.  For instance, I just bought some creatine from Amazon for 2/3 of what WalMart charges.  I don't think this bothers the WalMarts and Targets of the world, but as Amazon gets into physically larger items, things change.  Sure, I can get free shipping and maybe no sales tax on a queen-size mattress or washing machine, but what happens if it breaks?  Do I need to keep the shipping crate in my garage in case I have to send it back?  What does a &quot;20-year guarantee&quot; on a mattress really mean, especially if you are ordering from a third-party supplier that you've never heard of?  Thanks for the offer Amazon, but those kinds of things I will continue to buy locally.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 01:36:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think the larger B&amp;M stores like WalMart and Target will sharpen their pencils, beef up their on-line capabilities, and sell the advantages of buying local.<br/><br/>Amazon's future growth is totally dependent on the on-line consumer, a really fickle and non-loyal SOB, like me!  For stuff I buy regularly, I stick with brands I can trust and with a few clicks can get the best price.  For instance, I just bought some creatine from Amazon for 2/3 of what WalMart charges.  I don't think this bothers the WalMarts and Targets of the world, but as Amazon gets into physically larger items, things change.  Sure, I can get free shipping and maybe no sales tax on a queen-size mattress or washing machine, but what happens if it breaks?  Do I need to keep the shipping crate in my garage in case I have to send it back?  What does a &quot;20-year guarantee&quot; on a mattress really mean, especially if you are ordering from a third-party supplier that you've never heard of?  Thanks for the offer Amazon, but those kinds of things I will continue to buy locally.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Making Sense Of Amazon's Market Value</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/603331/comments?source=feed#comment-5627061</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5627061</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Wall Street loves Amazon and will use any model it can to justify its valuation.&quot;<br/><br/>Yup, I believe that's the way it works.  You can replace &quot;Amazon&quot; with CMG, PCLN, CRM or several other unique names.  &quot;Wall Street&quot; consists of large trading houses, hedge funds, banks and their mouthpieces, the analysts, all of whom gain from higher prices.  The more unique a company's business model is, the easier it is to invent some novel way of pumping up its share price.  And we sheep go, yeah, sure, that makes sense - I'd better buy another 100.  I wish I could remember some of the ridiculous metrics Wall Street came up with during the dotcom bubble to justify soaring prices of companies that had nothing more than an untested, unproven idea!<br/><br/>I can't wait to see what Wall Street will come up with to pump up Facebook over the next couple of months - after all, FB's PE is only half of AMZN's!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 12:22:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Wall Street loves Amazon and will use any model it can to justify its valuation.&quot;<br/><br/>Yup, I believe that's the way it works.  You can replace &quot;Amazon&quot; with CMG, PCLN, CRM or several other unique names.  &quot;Wall Street&quot; consists of large trading houses, hedge funds, banks and their mouthpieces, the analysts, all of whom gain from higher prices.  The more unique a company's business model is, the easier it is to invent some novel way of pumping up its share price.  And we sheep go, yeah, sure, that makes sense - I'd better buy another 100.  I wish I could remember some of the ridiculous metrics Wall Street came up with during the dotcom bubble to justify soaring prices of companies that had nothing more than an untested, unproven idea!<br/><br/>I can't wait to see what Wall Street will come up with to pump up Facebook over the next couple of months - after all, FB's PE is only half of AMZN's!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Skeptical Of Amazon At These Levels</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/544591/comments?source=feed#comment-4962361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4962361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Definitely a bizarre stock!  I bought a few puts at the open yesterday expecting Friday's runup and the Microsoft announcement to pressure the stock.  Instead, it's up over 2% on almost twice ADV!  Near term call volume is way above put volume as well.<br/><br/>Wtf!  Any idea what's going on here?  Obviously a lot of people think this is going to the moon!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 03:33:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Definitely a bizarre stock!  I bought a few puts at the open yesterday expecting Friday's runup and the Microsoft announcement to pressure the stock.  Instead, it's up over 2% on almost twice ADV!  Near term call volume is way above put volume as well.<br/><br/>Wtf!  Any idea what's going on here?  Obviously a lot of people think this is going to the moon!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>'One More Thing' About Apple</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/537901/comments?source=feed#comment-4891151</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4891151</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Rocco - your article is a good reminder of how important it is for investors to keep emotions out of investing.  In my younger days I had a sign on my desk, &quot;Don't follow your dick into Hell!&quot;  The theme was a bit different, but the idea was the same - we create our own Hell and then we have to live in it.<br/><br/>For fanboys and bashers who quote endless streams of numbers justifying their positions, I recommend three books that have helped my investing immensely:<br/><br/>The Black Swan by Nassim Taleb<br/>The Crowd by Gustave Le Bon<br/>Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Dummies by Wilson and Branch<br/><br/>... all available as e-books from Amazon.<br/><br/>CBT helps you look inside your head to better understand your behavior and belief systems.  Since I have always had problems with &quot;authority figures,&quot; I came to realize that Mr. Market was just another authority figure that I had to deal with.  CBT has helped me stop over trading my account based on what I'm sure a stock &quot;has&quot; to do.<br/><br/>I enjoy your articles a bunch!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 14:40:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Rocco - your article is a good reminder of how important it is for investors to keep emotions out of investing.  In my younger days I had a sign on my desk, &quot;Don't follow your dick into Hell!&quot;  The theme was a bit different, but the idea was the same - we create our own Hell and then we have to live in it.<br/><br/>For fanboys and bashers who quote endless streams of numbers justifying their positions, I recommend three books that have helped my investing immensely:<br/><br/>The Black Swan by Nassim Taleb<br/>The Crowd by Gustave Le Bon<br/>Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Dummies by Wilson and Branch<br/><br/>... all available as e-books from Amazon.<br/><br/>CBT helps you look inside your head to better understand your behavior and belief systems.  Since I have always had problems with &quot;authority figures,&quot; I came to realize that Mr. Market was just another authority figure that I had to deal with.  CBT has helped me stop over trading my account based on what I'm sure a stock &quot;has&quot; to do.<br/><br/>I enjoy your articles a bunch!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jobsian Reflection In Google's Glass</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/482321/comments?source=feed#comment-4198731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4198731</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I believe two major game-changers for mobile computing, and maybe computing in general, are user interfaces:  voice recognition and displays.  Voice recognition is well on its way and I would hope would be a major input option for all devices in the near future.  As for displays, I've often wondered why each device we use has to have its own display.  Displays add to the cost and size of the device, reduce battery life and are difficult to see in bright sunlight.  Obviously a remote HD display would require a lot of bandwidth but low-res images like icons and text would work fine with today's technology.  I think Glasses will take off and its offspring may well give device manufacturers a cheaper &quot;non-display&quot; option to sell.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 05:01:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I believe two major game-changers for mobile computing, and maybe computing in general, are user interfaces:  voice recognition and displays.  Voice recognition is well on its way and I would hope would be a major input option for all devices in the near future.  As for displays, I've often wondered why each device we use has to have its own display.  Displays add to the cost and size of the device, reduce battery life and are difficult to see in bright sunlight.  Obviously a remote HD display would require a lot of bandwidth but low-res images like icons and text would work fine with today's technology.  I think Glasses will take off and its offspring may well give device manufacturers a cheaper &quot;non-display&quot; option to sell.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Lesson Some Investors Never Learn: Keep It Simple</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/365361/comments?source=feed#comment-2654011</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2654011</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You forgot one very important element in trading large quantities of cheap options - commissions.  I pay $10 + $1.75 per contract (certainly not the best deal I could get), so your 250 contracts would cost about $447 to buy AND sell.  In your first example, you wouldn't even bother selling the 2.50 calls - just walk away for a total loss.  In the second, your $1000 profit on the 2.50s would be eaten by $894 in commissions, reinforcing the logic behind buying the 2.00 calls.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:26:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You forgot one very important element in trading large quantities of cheap options - commissions.  I pay $10 + $1.75 per contract (certainly not the best deal I could get), so your 250 contracts would cost about $447 to buy AND sell.  In your first example, you wouldn't even bother selling the 2.50 calls - just walk away for a total loss.  In the second, your $1000 profit on the 2.50s would be eaten by $894 in commissions, reinforcing the logic behind buying the 2.00 calls.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple And The Difference Between Pinning And Open Interest Max Pain</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/316922/comments?source=feed#comment-2142536</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2142536</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Good stuff Travis!  I've been trading options for a long time, but this is something I know very little about.  How can I learn more?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 05:04:13 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Good stuff Travis!  I've been trading options for a long time, but this is something I know very little about.  How can I learn more?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Searching for Gains With Yandex and Baidu</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/283673/comments?source=feed#comment-1802321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1802321</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I too am long YNDX and bought the stock after talking with a friend who works there. The company's future depends on attracting and keeping the best and brightest, and YNDX has concentrated on providing an all-inclusive work environment that encourages productivity by making it easy to work 24/7 when the employee wishes. He also mentioned that YNDX is very strong in Turkey and has targeted Turkish search as a key market.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 08:23:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I too am long YNDX and bought the stock after talking with a friend who works there. The company's future depends on attracting and keeping the best and brightest, and YNDX has concentrated on providing an all-inclusive work environment that encourages productivity by making it easy to work 24/7 when the employee wishes. He also mentioned that YNDX is very strong in Turkey and has targeted Turkish search as a key market.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
