Siemens Is An Electrical Engineering Powerhouse

| About: Siemens AG (SIEGY)

Siemens (SI) is a global powerhouse in electrical engineering and electronics, but that alone doesn't necessarily make it a good investment. Savvy investors know that the valuation of a company is critical to assessing whether it is an attractive investment. That's why we perform a rigorous discounted cash-flow methodology that is a critical component of our Valuentum Buying Index. Let's dig into Siemens' valuation.

But first, a little background to help you understand our article. Our Valuentum Buying Index ranks stocks on a scale from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best. Essentially, we at Valuentum are looking for firms that overlap investment methodologies, thereby revealing the greatest interest by investors (we like firms that fall in the center of the diagram below). Valuentum followers know the '12 Steps to Understanding the Stock Market' and understand the importance of others eventually coming around to one's investment thesis on a company.

If a company is undervalued both on a DCF and on a relative valuation basis and is showing improvement in technical and momentum indicators, the firm would score high on our scale. Siemens posts a VBI score of 6 on our scale, reflecting our 'fairly valued' DCF assessment of the firm, its neutral relative valuation versus peers, and bullish technicals. We compare Siemens to peers 3M (NYSE:MMM), Honeywell (NYSE:HON), and Tyco Intl (NYSE:TYC) for this analysis.

Our Report on Siemens

Investment Considerations

Investment Highlights

• Siemens's business quality (an evaluation of our ValueCreation™ and ValueRisk™ ratings) ranks among the best of the firms in our coverage universe. The firm has been generating economic value for shareholders with relatively stable operating results for the past few years, a combination we view very positively.

• Siemens is a global powerhouse in electrical engineering and electronics. The firm is focused on four distinct sectors: energy, healthcare, industry and infrastructure and cities. Most of the markets in which it operates have secular growth dynamics.

• Siemens has an excellent combination of strong free cash flow generation and low financial leverage. We expect the firm's free cash flow margin to average about 7.9% in coming years. Total debt-to-EBITDA was 1.4 last year, while debt-to-book capitalization stood at 40.3%.

• Although we think there may be a better time to dabble in the firm's shares based on our DCF process, the firm's stock has outperformed the market benchmark during the past quarter, indicating increased investor interest in the company.

• The company boasts an attractive dividend. Siemens's payout has expanded from 1.6 euro/shr in fiscal year 2008 to 3 euro/shr in fiscal year 2012. The company recently increased its payout ratio target to 40%-60% of earnings.

Business Quality

Economic Profit Analysis

The best measure of a firm's ability to create value for shareholders is expressed by comparing its return on invested capital (ROIC) with its weighted average cost of capital (OTC:WACC). The gap or difference between ROIC and WACC is called the firm's economic profit spread. Siemens's 3-year historical return on invested capital (without goodwill) is 20.4%, which is above the estimate of its cost of capital of 10.4%. As such, we assign the firm a ValueCreation™ rating of EXCELLENT. In the chart below, we show the probable path of ROIC in the years ahead based on the estimated volatility of key drivers behind the measure. The solid grey line reflects the most likely outcome, in our opinion, and represents the scenario that results in our fair value estimate.

Cash Flow Analysis

Firms that generate a free cash flow margin (free cash flow divided by total revenue) above 5% are usually considered cash cows. Siemens's free cash flow margin has averaged about 7.9% during the past 3 years. As such, we think the firm's cash flow generation is relatively STRONG. The free cash flow measure shown above is derived by taking cash flow from operations less capital expenditures and differs from enterprise free cash flow (FCFF), which we use in deriving our fair value estimate for the company. For more information on the differences between these two measures, please visit our website at At Siemens, cash flow from operations decreased about 24% from levels registered two years ago, while capital expenditures fell about 11% over the same time period.

Valuation Analysis

Our discounted cash flow model indicates that Siemens's shares are worth between $91.00 - $137.00 each. The margin of safety around our fair value estimate is driven by the firm's LOW ValueRisk™ rating, which is derived from the historical volatility of key valuation drivers. The estimated fair value of $114 per share represents a price-to earnings (P/E) ratio of about 15.5 times last year's earnings and an implied EV/EBITDA multiple of about 8.3 times last year's EBITDA. Our model reflects a compound annual revenue growth rate of 3.1% during the next five years, a pace that is higher than the firm's 3-year historical compound annual growth rate of -3.4%. Our model reflects a 5-year projected average operating margin of 11%, which is above Siemens's trailing 3-year average. Beyond year 5, we assume free cash flow will grow at an annual rate of 2.4% for the next 15 years and 3% in perpetuity. For Siemens, we use a 10.4% weighted average cost of capital to discount future free cash flows.

Margin of Safety Analysis

Our discounted cash flow process values each firm on the basis of the present value of all future free cash flows. Although we estimate the firm's fair value at about $114 per share, every company has a range of probable fair values that's created by the uncertainty of key valuation drivers (like future revenue or earnings, for example). After all, if the future was known with certainty, we wouldn't see much volatility in the markets as stocks would trade precisely at their known fair values. Our ValueRisk™ rating sets the margin of safety or the fair value range we assign to each stock. In the graph below, we show this probable range of fair values for Siemens. We think the firm is attractive below $91 per share (the green line), but quite expensive above $137 per share (the red line). The prices that fall along the yellow line, which includes our fair value estimate, represent a reasonable valuation for the firm, in our opinion.

Future Path of Fair Value

We estimate Siemens's fair value at this point in time to be about $114 per share. As time passes, however, companies generate cash flow and pay out cash to shareholders in the form of dividends. The chart below compares the firm's current share price with the path of Siemens's expected equity value per share over the next three years, assuming our long-term projections prove accurate. The range between the resulting downside fair value and upside fair value in Year 3 represents our best estimate of the value of the firm's shares three years hence. This range of potential outcomes is also subject to change over time, should our views on the firm's future cash flow potential change. The expected fair value of $145 per share in Year 3 represents our existing fair value per share of $114 increased at an annual rate of the firm's cost of equity less its dividend yield. The upside and downside ranges are derived in the same way, but from the upper and lower bounds of our fair value estimate range.

Pro Forma Financial Statements

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

About this article:

Author payment: $35 + $0.01/page view. Authors of PRO articles receive a minimum guaranteed payment of $150-500.
Tagged: , Telecom Services - Foreign, Germany
Want to share your opinion on this article? Add a comment.
Disagree with this article? .
To report a factual error in this article, click here