How To Play The Earnings Announcement

May 19, 2013 3:54 PM ETSalesforce, Inc. (CRM)13 Comments
Terry Allen profile picture
Terry Allen
1.66K Followers (NYSE:CRM) announces earnings after the close on Thursday, May 23, 2013. The company provides enterprise cloud computing solutions to various businesses and industries worldwide. Founded in 1999, it sports a market cap of $24 billion even though it has never showed a profit.

Not showing a profit makes it difficult to calculate a P/E ratio, forcing analysts to look at revenue as an alternative proxy to measure enterprise value. YOY revenue growth has been high, about 32%, which gives some justification for its forward P/E of 74. This compares to its competitors' forward multiples of 12 for Oracle (ORCL) and 20.5 for SAP (SAP). CRM seems pretty pricey, even if the company turns the corner to profitability.

Here are the results after the earnings announcement for the past four quarters, with the stock price change from the close on the day before the announcement until the closing price on Friday (when the weekly options expire):

For each of the last four quarters, the company has exceeded estimates by such a large margin that you might wonder what the analysts were smoking when they made their analyses. Actual results were over ten times greater than estimates almost every time. They weren't even in the same ball park. How could they be so far off so consistently for four consecutive quarters? Something is fishy here.

A conspiracy believer might suggest that they low-balled estimates and whispered to their bosses to buy shares. This might get them a raise because after every announcement the stock has moved higher by an average of 6.6%.

The pattern of analysts not being close to reality seems to be continuing. The current estimate ($.11) is after the 4 - 1 stock split declared on April 18th, so it is essentially $.44 compared to the old numbers. But last quarter the company reported earnings of $.51 and this is not a seasonal business, and with sales reportedly growing at 32% YOY, you would expect that earnings would be much higher. So why are estimates so much less than last quarter's earnings?

Over the last several months, I have been testing the proposition that the level of expectations prior to an earnings announcement is a better indicator of what the stock price will do than the actual earnings themselves.

I have been using several indicators to determine whether expectations are unusually high (or low) leading up to an earnings announcement and what the stock price is likely to do after the announcement:

  1. Stock price action in the most recent weeks.

  2. Whisper numbers vs. analyst estimates.

  3. Recent post-earnings price changes compared to earnings results (is there a pattern for that company)?

  4. Current RSI levels.

  5. Overwhelming positive (or negative) comments on various blog posts.

If expectations are usually high, there is an excellent chance that the stock will be flat or fall after the announcement, regardless of how much the company might surpass estimates, and conversely, the stock is more likely to move higher when expectations are low, even if estimates are merely met.

In addition, I have checked out recent hedge fund activity (are hedge funds buying or selling the stock?) to get a better handle on whether the stock is likely to rise or fall after the announcement. While hedge funds are not always right, they can be counted on to have conducted some serious due-diligence work before making a decision to commit or divest, and they have far more resources at their disposals than any individual could hope to have.

I have had some serious success with this model, including eight consecutive winning pre-earnings calls without a loss - see results.

CRM presents a serious challenge to my model. By the measures I have used so successfully, the current level of expectations is seriously high. Check out the recent price action:

The stock has picked up about 15% over the last six weeks and reached a new high last week while whisper numbers are $.13, or about 18% higher than estimates, and RSI is 94 (very overbought), all important indications that expectations are unusually high.

Institutions have added just over a million shares over the past quarter (an insignificant number for a company with 586 million shares outstanding), just about equal to the number of insider sales, so the hedge fund statistic is not much of an issue here.

People seem to either love or hate this company. In the week preceding the last earnings announcement, several articles were published on Seeking Alpha that panned them.

A sample, with a quote from each:

What's The Deal With

When viewed from the fundamentals, the current valuation of Salesforce is absurd.

Something Is Seriously Wrong With Salesforce

… at this dilutive speed, the stock is little more than a Ponzi scheme.

Salesforce Earnings Preview: 7th Consecutive GAAP Loss Expected

What has occurred at Salesforce in recent years are efforts to maximize insider shareholder wealth with no regard to and to the exclusion of outside shareholders.

With comments like these, how could anyone expect the stock to move higher after the earnings announcement that came out after the close on February 28th? But it managed to go up by 7.6%.

Indeed, there is a lot to not like about CRM. Executive compensation, for one. Marc Benioff, co-founder and Chairman, collected $110 million in salary and options exercise last year (seems like an unreasonable compensation for running a company that chalked up an operating loss of about $270 million). Three other top managers earned an average of ten times their million dollar salaries in options exercise as well.

For some (unknown to most of the public), most analysts seem to love the company. Fourteen rate it a strong buy, 24 a buy, and continuing the love-'em-or-hate-'em theme, 5 rate it as underperform or sell and only 4 are neutral, calling it a hold.

Maybe the analysts are low-balling estimates to make the company look good, waiting for the stock to move higher after earnings because they beat earnings so badly, and justifying their "buy" or "strong buy" ratings so they get to keep their jobs for another quarter or so.

If I liked this company, I would buy shares before the announcement because of the remarkably consistent pattern of besting estimates and having the stock move higher after the announcement.

If I were bearish on CRM (or if I had total faith in my expectations hypothesis), I would take advantage of the escalated option prices for the May 4-13 weeklies which carry an implied volatility (IV) of 80 compared to 48 for the June-13 options. I would invest in 10 diagonal spreads, buying June-13 50 puts and selling May4-13 (expiring 5/24/13) 47.5 puts.

I would also buy 7 June-13 - May 4-13 call calendar spreads, paying about $.40 just in case the stock does manage to move about 6% higher, continuing the historical pattern. This is the risk profile graph if you bought this combination of spreads, assuming that IV of the June options would fall from 48 to 40 after the announcement, shelling out about $2500:

These positions should make a gain if the stock moves as much as 6.6% higher (the average change for the past four quarters) after the announcement or falls by any amount. The maximum gain (about 50%) would come if the stock remained essentially flat. I think I will try this play with only a small investment because while my expectations hypothesis would predict a flat or lower stock price after earnings, there is a conflicting strong historical pattern of the stock moving higher after announcements. These spreads seem to cover both possibilities and should only lose if the stock moves up 7% or more.

The wonderful thing about options is that you can be wrong and still make a gain, just as long as you aren't terribly wrong. The CRM earnings announcement history makes it a particularly challenging earnings play, regardless of whether you prefer stock or options.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, but may initiate a short position in CRM over the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: I plan to buy the CRM option spreads outlined in the article prior to the earnings announcement. I am also long an ORCL straddle.

This article was written by

Terry Allen profile picture
Publisher of options newsletter since 2001.. Thirty years experience trading options virtually every day. including stint as seat holder and market maker on the C.B.O.E. MBA from Harvard Business School and DBA from Univ. of Virginia Darden School. Author of Making 36%: Duffer's Guide to Breaking Par in the Market Every Year, In Good Years and Bad (4th revision - 2012) and Coffee Can Investing: A Better Idea Than Mutual Funds in an IRA or 401(K), 2014. is a newsletter that carries out eight different option portfolios which many subscribers mirror on their own or through auto-trade at several brokers who make all the same trades in individual customer accounts. Each portfolio offers something different (bullish, neutral, or bearish),and different underlyings (GOOG, SPY, SVXY, and other individual companies). In 2005, the S.E.C. brought an action against Dr. Terry Allen, claiming that he was managing money for people without being a registered investment advisor because of the auto-trade service offered by several brokers who placed trades in their customer accounts based on Terry’s Tips newsletter recommendations. A second complaint was for a single statement on his website that they believed was incorrect and therefore fraudulent. Although two large law firms assured Dr. Allen that if he went to court on the first issue, he would win because there was a Supreme Court decision stating that investment newsletters are exempt from registration requirements - it would be a violation of their First Amendment rights. However, they estimated that his legal expenses would be greater than settling with the S.E.C. (and a year or two of his time tied up in court proceedings), and both firms recommended that he accept the settlement offer while not admitting any guilt. The second issue (fraud) involved a single statement that was true when it was written but a couple of years later, option prices fell to 10-year lows, and it was no longer true. The S.E.C. argued that the statement was not removed from the website in a timely enough fashion. For the past eight years since the settlement with the S.E.C., Dr. Allen has have been publishing the Terry’s Tips newsletter (and recommendations are executed in customer accounts at thinkorswim by TD Ameritrade through their Auto-Trade program), and the S.E.C. has not objected to any of his activities.

Recommended For You

Comments (13)

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.