The data out of China can leave one bewildered. After having one of the hottest, if not the hottest property market on Earth in 2009, it appears real estate has turned on a dime. Which would explain the rotten performance of Chinese real estate firm E-House Holdings (NYSE:EJ) the past few months. (amazing how the stock "knows", right?)
- Second-hand home sales in Beijing fell almost 70 percent in January from the previous month, after the central government issued several policies aimed at curbing prices, the Shanghai Securities News reported today.
- Home sales in Shanghai fell 51 percent in January from December, the Shanghai-based newspaper said in a separate report.
That's simply awe inspiring and once more shows how central command can turn on / off the 'spigot' via the banks. A year ago at this time the fire hose was turned on full blast - which led us to worry about the eventual outcomes. [Feb 16 2009: Is China Pulling an Alan Greenspan?] This was highlighted in the summer and [Aug 13, 2009: WSJ - In China, Land Prices Fan Bubble Fears] again a month ago [Dec 31, 2009: BW - China Property Bubble May Lead to US Style Real Estate Slump] But according to American dogma as long as "the market" (in all it's wisdom) is going up, then policies must be good. And warnings are to be ignored as talk of "doomsdayers".
I will give the Chinese credit... unlike their American peers at the Federal Reserve who apparently have the eyesight of a 108 year old man and claim they cannot "see bubbles forming", the Chinese are at least proactive when they see assets inflate to levels they don't approve of. Perhaps Lasik surgery is more advanced in China than the US? Or India? [Nov 28, 2008: NYT - How India Avoided the Crisis] Or just about any country not named Britain or Spain.
It shows once again the difference in cultures - one proactive, one reactive (and only reactive in dire emergency because of a dysfunctional leadership). In the US we are told bubbles are impossible to see by our
enablers regulators and we can only fix them after they burst . More importantly our oligarchs can profit from both the bubble inflating and then bursting, and really they are the only important ones in the new paradigm finance based, service economy...
About 2/3rds of the way through January, reports surfaced that China had told many of its major banks to effectively stop lending for the balance of the month. Specific to property, there appear to be more clamps coming... here is a story on property loans & 3rd mortgages. 3rd mortgages? How did the financial innovators at Goldman Sachs not come up with this first? And please tell me whatever Chinese person came up with this innovation was paid at least a $65 million bonus as is appropriate for such an 'advancement'...
- China’s government, seeking to stem property speculation, told banks to raise interest rates on third mortgages and demand bigger down payments for such loans, a person with knowledge of the matter said.
- The China Banking Regulatory Commission warned lenders of the risks associated with “hot money” flowing into the property market, the person said, requesting anonymity because the agency hasn’t published the measures. Mortgage defaults in China are rising, the person said without giving figures.
- The regulator also told banks to stop granting new loans to developers found to be hoarding land or intentionally delaying property sales, and to take measures to make sure existing advances are repaid, the person said. Banks were told they should reject loan applications from people buying homes for “investment and speculation” purposes, the person said.
- An index tracking property companies traded in Shanghai fell to a nine-month low today on concern the government will tighten real-estate credit to prevent a bubble from forming.
- The government last month raised the amount of money banks are required to keep as reserves and re-imposed a sales tax on homes sold within five years of their purchase.
And if you think Ben Bernanke's printing press is not creating problems the world over, even in "closed economies" think again...
- Almost 40 percent of buyers of luxury residential properties worth more than 10 million yuan last year in Shanghai were from overseas, the person said. The CBRC found one case where 38 foreign citizens who never entered China managed to take out mortgages from a bank in Shanghai through their agents and lawyers, without providing necessary documentation, according to the person.
When asked to comment on this story, Mr. Bernanke responded "Bubbles? The only bubbles I have ever seen are the Michael Jackson monkey kind. Otherwise bubbles are invisible to me! Plus I need not even identify the biggest bubble in history - I still keep my job either way. But I do stand ready to print money to fix the problem - at this I excel *pat self on back*."
Ok I made that last bit up... the rest is true. ;)