My Quant Trading Experiment

Includes: DAR, INTC
by: Alex Filonov

Quantitative trading is supposed to be for big hedge funds. I'm trying to prove that theory wrong, starting with two systems from James Altucher.

System 2.5x2, modified 3x2 system, described here. (Caution: quant portfolios on are not being updated regularly, all trades there are wrong). I changed the system to my liking: buy if the stock closed down two days in a row and is down in the morning of the third day. Sell stock if it closed up and is up next day near closing.

System 3.5x2, modified 4x2 system, described here. My take: buy if the stock closed down three days in a row and is down on the fourth morning. Sell the same way as in 2.5x2 system.

Of course, both systems frontrun originals. But I'm adding several more conditions.

I'm only trading stocks, which are in my database and backtested against both systems. If the stock has a better return for 2.5x2 system, I buy it on the third day, if 3.5x2 system is better, then I buy it on the fourth day. There is a program which runs a search every morning and sends me candidates. Of these, I choose several stocks to buy. I'm allocating 15% of my portfolio to this system.

I ran paper trading for a couple of weeks to make sure it might work. Now is the time for real test.

Yesterday's buys:
2.5x2: Darling International Inc (NYSE:DAR), Intel Corp (NASDAQ:INTC).

No buys for 3.5x2.

About this article:

Want to share your opinion on this article? Add a comment.
Disagree with this article? .
To report a factual error in this article, click here