LinkedIn's (LNKD) Q4 and FYR lived up to expectations, but guidance was not what the market had hoped for. So once again the usual pounding happened in after hours trading, but to my surprise, not enough if you ask me.
Actually, the company's results were great and I don't think investors could have asked much more from the company. Anything more would have been unrealistic. But once again, the problem is not the results or even the guidance, it's what you pay for it. And in LinkedIn's case, investors are paying way too much.
Let me tell you what shocked me from yesterday's report. Earnings aside and taking only revenue into account, the chart below shows the quarterly revenue of LinkedIn over the past several years.
The blue line is the quarterly revenue of the company up until its recent report. The extension to that, beyond Q4 of 2013 (the green line), are numbers filled in by me based on guidance. In other words, irrespective of the actual results, I started with Q1 of 2014 by plucking in $460 in revenue -- which is management's upper limit guidance -- and from there I simply increase randomly revenue every quarter thereafter, so as to come within guidance of $2 billion in revenue for all of 2014 (the green line).
The red line calculates year-over-year quarterly revenue growth. Now up to the most recent quarter, quarterly growth on a year-over-year basis has been coming down since about Q3 of 2011. With the most recent results, it is now down to about 40%. But based on management's guidance, that will come down to about 20% by the end of 2014.
My question is, is LinkedIn worth $26 billion? Is any company with $2 billion in revenue and with forward guidance of 20% revenue growth worth that much? In my book, LinkedIn is not worth $26 billion even with 50% year-over-year quarterly revenue growth, let alone 20%.
But let me ask investors another question. What will happen if the growth trajectory of the company continues to disappoint further in 2015 and 2016? How much of a multiple will the market put on LinkedIn then, if for example management's guidance calls for 30% revenue growth in 2015 instead of the almost 50% that the market is expecting? Will the market still pay $26 billion for the company's stock? My answer is no.
And if you want my opinion, if management disappoints again and the market realizes that the super high growth days are over, then it will mark the stock down beyond what anyone imagines. By how much we will have to wait and see, but even $100 a share is pretty farfetched for LinkedIn's stock if you ask me.
The market was modeling $2.16 in revenue for 2014 and management gave the market around $2 billion. The market is modeling around $2.9 billion in revenue for 2015 and my guess is that analysts will be bringing that figure down. By how much makes no difference, because even with $3 billion in revenue, there is no reason for LinkedIn's market cap to be around $26 billion anyway.
Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.