About a month ago I suggested that investors should think about Dow 20K.
While I recommend reading the prior article, the major theme was that the average investor was overwhelmed with negative news, negative media, negative blogs, and a boatload of Dow 5000 predictions. This article updates the thesis and provides a small quiz, especially for the skeptics.
The market bias is all wrong, and people should realize the facts. The Dow is much more likely to double than to get cut in half. It is only the recent history that leads people astray. If you have some time before you need your money, the historical odds are with you. The allegedly bullish representatives on TV talk about a ten percent gain this year while the bears suggest that you will lose half of your money. The media message is biased, and the average investor is scared silly.
I have several objectives in mind by introducing the target of Dow 20K.
Asking the Right Questions
The bias is inherent in the situation. The problems are known. If you write for a major publication, you are rewarded for analyzing the negagativity. If you go on TV, you are expected to parrot the analysis of problems. This makes you seem smart.
By contrast, the solutions are vague and unknown. If you even talk about them, all of the "hot shots" are skeptical.
That should be your clue to pay attention. Repeating the known news does not make you money. Try asking these questions:
If you have not thought about these possibilities, you have a fixation on negativity. My Dow 20K concept is designed to set you free -- to get you thinking about the long sweep of history and the potential for success. If even a few of these things happen, what would be the market reaction?
Meanwhile, I am not yet ready to provide a specific time frame, although I am working on it. I will not and cannot elaborate the entire reasoning in a single 1000-word article. Those joining me on the analytic quest will open their minds and make money.
A Pop Quiz from the Old Prof
I know that there are many Dow 20K skeptics, so here is a a little quiz (answers at the end) devised especially for you:
You can kid yourself, but I already know that your grade is an "F". I have tested the questions on a number of veteran traders. They do not know the answers. If you do, you are among a very select group of readers. They can only name about 15 Dow stocks and you probably can't get to ten without a mistake.
Here is an idea for Erin Burnett. Ask a few of these questions to your next "expert." It would be an interesting reality check to see if guests had any factual knowledge.
Meanwhile, many investors have a high degree of confidence while completely lacking the most basic information. This is exactly what I was pointing out in yesterday's article about the Dunning-Kruger effect. The average investor is touted by TV ads, encouraged to invest because he has a "feel for the market." No information required.
The advertising firms and the financial media are treating you as if you were a clueless bozo. The Dunning-Kruger effect operates on self-selection. You have the opportunity to decide whether to be a bozo, or to open your mind to alternatives. It is your choice.
A Few Answers
Here are a couple of answers for the pop quiz. You can look up the Dow stocks here. My best respondent (an extremely intelligent friend who is a veteran trader) had a good approach. He thought about drugs, oil companies, consumer stocks, financials, cyclicals, conglomerates, and technology. He got to about 15 with only one mistake and probably would have reached twenty given more time. If you could write down ten Dow stocks, you are in an elite group.
This means that most people hold a strong opinion about "the market" without knowing many facts.
The Dow has only two energy stocks, Exxon Mobil (XOM) and Chevron (CVX). There are several technology representatives but it is all complicated because the Dow is price-weighted. Here are the 10% move answers:
Those are the only answers for this article. I have the other answers, of course, but it is an ongoing research project.
If you do not know the answers, why are you so confident?
This article was written by