By Ronald Delegge
One definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over while expecting a different result. This is an apt description of retirement income investors who definitely want and need more dividends, but are going about it in the wrong way.
For bond investors, yields on 10-Year U.S. Treasuries have slid almost 12% since the start of the year. That means less income and less cash flow is coming from your bond investments. Buy more bonds isn't the solution.
For stock investors, the yield on the S&P 500 is around 60% less today compared to the early 1980s. (See chart below) Buying more stocks isn't the solution.
Let's examine a few ways that people nearing retirement or already retired can beat the income shortage they face.
Step 1: Tilt Toward Dividend Sectors
Tilting your investments toward high yielding sectors is one way for beating the retirement income shortage. Instead of chasing sectors with the simply the highest historical yield, it's best to focus on the sustainability of current yields.
Real Estate Investment Trusts or "REITs" are one example of a sector that carries a yield 50% higher than the S&P 500 index. Owning income producing assets like this is an excellent way to overcome the retirement income shortage.
Step 2: Use Proven Income Strategies
To those who say selling monthly covered calls is inferior to a conventional buy-and-hold strategy, here's what the numbers say: The CBOE Buy-Write Index has gained 930% versus a gain of just 573% for the S&P 500 since June 1988. Not only are the risk-adjusted returns of the buy-write strategy better than the S&P 500, but so is the monthly cash flow.
In ETFguide's Income Mix Portfolio, we use a similar strategy to the CBOE's buy-write index, but on a diversified basket of ETFs linked to other major asset classes like gold and real estate. Over the past year, the Income Mix has generated a close to a 9% yield based upon a $100,000 portfolio value.
Selling covered calls is a proven strategy for generating monthly cash flow. It's not market timing, but rather a systematic way for extrapolating income from the market.
Step 3: Eliminate High Cost Income Mutual Funds
Cutting your investment costs is an immediate fix to increasing your investment portfolio's cash flow. This is especially true with high cost dividend or income oriented mutual funds that are stealing your cash flow.
The $90 billion Franklin Income Fund (MUTF:FKINX) is one example of how you can trim the fat. FKINX (A-shares) charges a bloated 4.25% sales load just to get in. Furthermore, the fund's 0.62% annual expense ratio is consuming almost 20% of its 3.55% yield. Imagine sharing 20% of your income with somebody you never met. That's what you do when you buy-and-hold income mutual funds with excessive fees. The obvious solution is to choose lower cost income funds that permit you to keep more of your yield.
Disclosure: No positions
Link to the original article on ETFguide.com