Congressmen Weiner and Waxman Set Gold Hearing

Just as the government is trying to prevent people from investing in anything other than T-Bills by raising taxes on taxable interest and dividends to confiscatory levels, it's also trying to prevent you from parking your wealth in assets, like gold, that compete with the paper dollars issued by the Federal Reserve and the Treasury. A press release from Rep. Anthony Weiner, Democrat of New York, not yet (as of this instant) posted on Mr. Weiner's Web site, announces that a September 23 hearing of the Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and Consumer Protection (a subcommittee of Rep. Henry Waxman's Commerce Committee) will focus on "legislation that would regulate gold-selling companies, an industry who's [sic] relentless advertising is now staple of cable television."
From the press release: "Under Rep. Weiner's bill, companies like Goldline would be required to disclose the reasonable resale value of items being sold." That's great. Are Mr. Weiner and Chairman Bernanke also going to agree to print on every dollar the reasonable expectation that its value will be eroded by inflation?
Gold investors (or speculators) are already punished by the federal government by having their investment, even in a gold exchange-traded-fund, taxed at the higher rates that apply to collectibles rather than long term capital gains.
Not to mention the fact that Mr. Weiner's regulatory push seems as much aimed at conservative journalists as at the gold-dealers. The press release says, "Goldline employs several conservative pundits to act as shills for its' [sic] precious metal business, including Glenn Beck, Mike Huckabee, Laura Ingraham, and Fred Thompson. By drumming up public fears during financially uncertain times, conservative pundits are able to drive a false narrative. Glenn Beck for example has dedicated entire segments of his program to explaining why the U.S. money supply is destined for hyperinflation with Barack Obama as president."
Imagine the uproar if a Republican-majority Congress started investigating and having a regulatory crackdown on big advertisers in liberal outlets such as the New York Times. The First Amendment freedom-of-the-press crowd would be marching in the streets.
The whole situation is amazing. If Mr. Weiner really wants to calm fears about hyperinflation, the last way to do it is to have a government hearing cracking down on the people warning of it.
The press release reports that "invitations to the hearing have been sent to the representatives of Goldline International, the Federal Trade Commission, the Consumers Union and other potential witnesses, including former Goldline employees." Mr. Weiner might also consider calling John Paulson and George Soros, who have also reportedly been buying gold lately, though Mr. Soros was also quoted as calling it a bubble. But Mr. Paulson saw the housing bubble coming so he might be right about the inflation risks, and Mr. Soros is a big funder of left-wing causes, so neither of them would fit with the objective of the hearing.
Anyway, we are looking forward to the hearing, which should be quite a show.
This article was written by
Recommended For You
Comments (369)


Control is the #1 - 21th century Fascist/Statist's aphrodisiac. Whether the Wieners & Waxmans of the world succeed or not is an argument destined to end as most arguments do, in sophistry.


I agree with you on Iran - and you are right in that the Reps face a challenge of philosophy, but confrontation with Iran is inevitable with the establishment of either party and I believe all that much sooner due to the domination of Clinton policy by the Brzezinski, " Grand Chessboard" , Central Asian philosophy. Obama is clueless. Hillary is doing her best to pick a fight anywhere she can find one and one with Iran would be her ticket to the White House.
If Clinton can find a way to take China's opposition out of the Iranian equation & not kill any Russian guest nuke workers in the process - Iran is toast - Obama chooses not to run and the Clintons return to power. Now, gold & silver. Last week, two sets of sterling sold at auction. Both were identical in piece count and troy weight. The 1st set was a well known manufacturer/ designer, but was a very simple pattern. It sold for spot. The 2nd was by George Jensen ( high end European designer ) and was a desirable pattern. It sold for 5 X spot. If you took a hammer to them - all you would have was spot value. The ONLY difference is that George Jensen designs are believed to be aesthetically superior and therefor more valuable by a market segment. So, that people are willing to pay more from one gold supplier than another, for whatever reason, doesn't make it a crime. Foolish perhaps, but not illegal or necessarily immoral. Its called Marketing.

We must call a congressional committee to empower a special prosecutor! I'm tired of being ripped off by BIG Coffee! We must root out this corruption once and for all! Where's Waxman & Weiner when we need them?
Sorry, I forgot that Starbucks doesn't sponsor the opposition, so I guess congress isn't interested. I'll just have to buy my gold - I mean coffee, down the road at Rosland Capital - opps - G Gordon Liddy - can't go there.
Guess I'll have to do without until Waxman & Weiner tell us who the APPROVED vendor is.



Mildred Pierce: Palin isn't currently a politician - she's playing at pundit and brains aren't a requirement for either> hope she doesn't make the mistake of running. We already have 1 drama queen in the White House and don't need another.
Gebby: You are mistaking political cycles for business cycles. American manufacturing was exported wholesale under Dem controlled congresses and like many - are thinking that Bush Jr was a conservative. He wasn't. This Dem party of 2008 is way left of the Dem party of 1992. As bad as Bush Jr was - can you even imagine where we would be after 8 years of Al Gore. Trading gold would be the least of our problems.









The LAST place I would look for gold coinage would be retailers like Goldline ( and others ) but they have the right to charge whatever they want. And I say caveat emptor.
As for gold as an investment - as long as they continue to debase the dollar and real estate continues its fall - I'm in. And I only pay spot.
