The Williams Companies, Berkshire Hathaway Lead 20 Best Bond Trades With Maturities Of 10 Years Or More

| About: Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B)


There were 25,672 bond trades in 4,362 non-call fixed-rate corporate bonds worth $8 billion on June 6.

We rank all trades with volume of $5 million or more, and maturities of 10 years and longer by the ratio of credit spread to default probability.

The Williams Companies and Berkshire Hathaway lead the list of 20 best value bond trades.

We last ranked the best value 10-year fixed-rate corporate bond issues on May 30, 2014. Today, we rank the best value corporate bond trades with daily trading volume of at least $5 million, and maturities of 10 years or longer on June 6, 2014. On June 6 in the U.S. bond market, there were 25,672 bond trades in 4,362 non-call fixed-rate corporate bond issues representing $8,032,887,143 in notional principal. Which 20 trades were the best trades of the day, and how do we decide the answer to that question? Today, we answer those questions for bonds with maturities of 10 years or longer.

Conclusion: We find the best-value non-call senior fixed rate 10-year maturity or longer bond trades on June 6, 2014 were issues by these firms:








WELLS FARGO & CO. (NYSE:WFC), 3 issues


FEDEX CORP. (NYSE:FDX), 2 issues






Best Value 10 Year or Longer Bond Trades for June 6, 2014

In analyzing the best trades of the day, we used these criteria:

Bond type: Fixed rate

Callability: Non-call

Seniority: Senior debt

Trade Volume: $5 million or more

Maturity: 10 years or longer

Ratings: Ignored

We ignored legacy ratings in making today's selection, but all but 5 of the trades meeting our criteria had an investment grade rating by the pre-Dodd Frank Act definition. We used the same criterion for "best" that we have used in recent analyses of bonds issued by Deutsche Bank (NYSE:DB), Bank of Nova Scotia (NYSE:BNS), Barclays PLC (NYSE:BCS), Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL), and Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL). That criterion is the reward to risk ratio, calculated as the ratio of credit spread to matched-maturity default probability. The default probabilities used are described in detail in the daily default probability analysis posted by Kamakura Corporation. Both the credit spreads and default probabilities are reported as percent figures. The text of the Dodd-Frank legislation as it concerns the definition of "investment grade" is summarized at the end of our analysis of Citigroup (C) bonds published December 9, 2013.

In all, there were 63 issues that met our criteria. The distribution of credit spreads is given in this histogram:

The median credit spread was 1.512% and the average credit spread was 1.783%. The distribution of the credit spread to default probability ratio is given in this histogram:

The median credit spread to default probability ratio was 8.376 and the average was 9.812.

Here are the ranking results, listed with the best ratio numbered 1, with a Williams Companies bond issue the winner at a reward to risk ratio of 30.6 times, followed closely by a Berkshire Hathaway bond issue at 26.1 times:


Many investors have requested that we provide CUSIPs as part of this chart. Redistribution of CUSIPs is currently prohibited by Kamakura Corporation's contract with the data vendor. We are working hard to change this so that we may make CUSIPs available in the future. In the meantime, CUSIPs for major issuers can be found easily with an internet such on web pages like this one from the New York Stock Exchange.

Background on the Calculations

Assuming the recovery rate in the event of default would be the same on all bond issues, a sophisticated investor who has moved beyond legacy ratings seeks to maximize revenue per basis point of default risk from each incremental investment, subject to risk limits on macro-factor exposure on a fully default-adjusted basis.

Maximizing the ratio of credit spread to matched-maturity default probabilities requires that default probabilities be available at a wide range of maturities. We used the default probabilities supplied by Kamakura Corporation's KRIS default probability service, interpolated to a matched-maturity basis to the exact day of bond maturity. For maturities longer than ten years, we assume that the ten-year default probability is a good estimate of default risk.

Bond yields are secured from TRACE. The National Association of Securities Dealers launched the TRACE (Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine) system in July 2002 in order to increase price transparency in the U.S. corporate debt market. The system captures information on secondary market transactions in publicly traded securities (investment grade, high yield and convertible corporate debt) representing all over-the-counter market activity in these bonds.

We used the trade-weighted average yield reported by TRACE for each of the bond issues analyzed. We calculated the credit spread using the matched-maturity yield on U.S. Treasury bonds, interpolated from the Federal Reserve H15 statistical release for the trade date. The source of the information on the H15 release is the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

Forward-Looking Best Value Bond Selection

Today's analysis looks back at yesterday's trades. A forward-looking bond selection based on today's prices at this instant is done in the same way, with slight differences in the data sources.

Author's Note

Regular readers of these notes are aware that we generally do not list the major news headlines relevant to the firms in question. We believe that other authors on Seeking Alpha, Yahoo, at The New York Times, The Financial Times, and The Wall Street Journal do a fine job of this. Our omission of those headlines is intentional. Similarly, to argue that a specific news event is more important than all other news events in the outlook for the firm is something we again believe is inappropriate for this author. Our focus is on current bond prices, credit spreads, and default probabilities, key statistics that we feel are critical for both fixed income and equity investors.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

About this article:

Author payment: $35 + $0.01/page view. Authors of PRO articles receive a minimum guaranteed payment of $150-500.
Want to share your opinion on this article? Add a comment.
Disagree with this article? .
To report a factual error in this article, click here