As the world grows ever larger, its people demand more and better food. This trend will continue to benefit investors in fertilizer companies, declares John Chu of AltaCorp Capital Inc. In this interview with The Mining Report, Chu explains that a near-term supply crunch is good news for juniors and highlights four companies with projects than can meet demand, as well as a revolutionary Canadian company that is pioneering agricultural streaming.
The Mining Report: Ding Xuedong, chairman of the $650-billion [$650B] China Investment Corp. [CIC], wrote in the Financial Times June 17 that the CIC is "keen to invest more across the entire value chain" of the agriculture sector. What does this mean for Chinese and world food supply?
John Chu: It could be very big, not just for China but for the world. We're going to see some significant investments from CIC in agriculture and into regions that have seriously lacked funding. China has already been investing in African farmland, which should increase food supply and alleviate some of the recent pressures we've seen. Last year, China bought Smithfield Foods, America's largest pork producer, and Chinese state-owned entities have invested in egg production as well.
In 7 of the last 12 years, crop demand has exceeded supply. This has led to higher food prices across the globe.
TMR: Can we expect food prices to continue to increase?
JC: Yes. Developing countries are becoming richer, which leads to greater demand for beef, chicken and pork, which in turn leads to greater demand for cereals and grains.
TMR: Ding Xuedong also said that the CIC is "keen to work with the right partners to invest in greenfield projects." Can we then expect major Chinese investment in the Western fertilizer sector, as we have seen with oil and gas and the purchase of Smithfield?
JC: I'm a little skeptical about that. China is now the world's number one nitrogen producer, with four times as much capacity as Russia. And China is also number one in phosphate fertilizer production. The only area where it's actually lacking is potash. It does have some domestic reserves in the Qinghai Salt Lake Potash Company Ltd. [000792:SZSE]. Once that ramps up to full capacity, it can probably meet 40% of China's domestic needs.
CIC has just made investments in Uralkali (OTC:URALL) [URKA:RTS; URKA:MCX; URKA:LSE], a Russian potash player, and has an equity stake in Potash Corp. (POT). But given how weak the markets are now, China is not likely in a big hurry to make any further major potash investments anytime soon.
TMR: What is the projected growth of the fertilizer sector, and can supply keep up with demand?
JC: Potash has the strongest growth. This is driven by China, India and Brazil, which have considerable upside potential in potash demand. Historically, 5- to 10-year projections for annual potash demand growth have been in the 3-5% range. But that growth will come from a lower base, given how weak demand was last year.
Phosphate comes next, with a 2-4% annual growth forecast. Nitrogen comes last, in the 1-3% range, but it's always had the most stable and predictable growth. Currently, we've probably got excess supply for most of the fertilizers, and demand has been a bit choppy considering the sharp run-up in prices over the last several years. Some of the major buyers are playing a cat-and-mouse game, not necessarily following through with what they've ordered in the past, to try to keep prices down a bit. So supply now meets demand, but over the longer-term we expect that demand should catch up and require new capacity coming on-line.
TMR: Will the rapidly growing world population lead to the benefits of the green revolution topping out?
JC: Probably not. There's so much unused arable land in such places as Russia, Brazil and Africa. Significant new investment will be required, but technologies, such as new seeds and GPS systems, and techniques such as proper fertilizer balance, cannot help but contribute to higher food yields and production growth. To give one example, U.S. corn yields are expected to potentially hit a new record high, and the U.S. is a mature corn growing region.
TMR: How much corn is used for biodiesel?
JC: Upward of 40% of U.S.-produced corn is used for ethanol. Some of the byproduct can be used for feed, so on a net basis it's probably around 25%.
TMR: Does this mean edible corn shortages and higher prices?
JC: It has led to shortages and higher prices, but typically in the agriculture sector, higher spot prices lead to a supply response. I mentioned the record U.S. corn harvest. The Chinese situation is similar, and Ukraine and Brazil are stepping up as well.
TMR: To what extent is phosphate production dominated by North African and Middle Eastern suppliers?
JC: Production of the fertilizers that farmers use is dominated by China, Russia and the U.S. Africa and the Middle East control about 75% of the production of phosphate rock, which is the raw material.
TMR: Could this be considered a strategic problem?
JC: Not quite yet. There is more than sufficient reserve out there. But that region is beginning to get into added value, and that could raise prices for phosphate rock.
TMR: How do you rate the prospects for the current North American producers?
JC: They're all in a good position now because the North American fertilizer market across the board is very strong. On the nitrogen side, prices favor Agrium Inc. (AGU), but, overall, shale gas has helped change many North American players from high-cost to low-cost producers. North American demand remains strong, which is good for Potash Corp., as is the potential for greater demand from China and India.
The global fertilizer market is tightening up. Uralkali and Belaruskali [its Belarus equivalent] had formed a marketing arm, which some people like to call a cartel. Along with Canpotex, which is the North American version of that, composed of Potash Corp., Agrium and The Mosaic Co. (NYSE:MOS), they controlled about 65-75% of world potash supply, and their focus was always on price over volume. Uralkali announced a year ago it was walking away from its partnership. That's when potash prices plunged. Now, however, we hear that Uralkali and Belaruskali could resume some sort of working arrangement, which would restrict supply and raise prices.
TMR: Is being a North American fertilizer producer advantageous?
JC: It is because the home market is a mature one without many swings in consumption, unlike developing markets such as Brazil, China and India. And the North American producers have good access from the East Coast and West Coast to serve those developing markets.
TMR: It will produce thermal potash. Is this particularly suited to Brazil?
JC: Thermal potash has a lower potash content than some of the other potash products. It has unique characteristics, such as a slow release into the soil. This is particularly good for sugar cane, coffee and other crops specific to Brazil. It also contains lime and other micronutrients that the Brazilian soil needs. Thermal potash has a history in Brazil and will not be anything new to local consumers.
TMR: Does the Brazilian government expect to be repaid for its investment, or is it considering an equity position?
JC: My understanding is that there is a loan component that must be repaid, but that's several years down the road. Part of the loan could be forgiven.
TMR: You wanted to bring readers' attention to an agricultural company that is not involved in fertilizer.
JC: That would be Input Capital Corp. (OTC:INPCF) [INP:TSX.V]. Its initial public offering was last year. The company has a new idea: giving loans to canola farmers to help fund their working capital. In exchange, Input receives an interest in each farmer's canola crop. For example, it may give $2M to a farmer for what is effectively 1.5 Kt of canola per year over a six-year period, with a floor price for the grain set in advance.
This is a fascinating concept, considering that Canada is the world's leading canola producer. The potential market is quite large. Canadian grain farmers were squeezed by the extraordinarily cold winter of 2014. This resulted in rail delays whereby farmers weren't able to monetize their crops. They sat in storage bins, temporary storage bags or on the field waiting for delivery. This created some havoc in the agriculture space in general. Equipment companies saw their sales fall because the farmers didn't have the cash. Nonetheless, the farmers still had loans to repay, and this triggered higher interest rates. As a result, farmers are looking at nontraditional ways to fund expansion plans and working capital needs.
TMR: What does Input's new idea offer investors?
JC: It gives investors good exposure to agriculture with limited downside risk.
TMR: The streaming model in silver and gold has been enormously successful. How much of this have we seen in agricultural commodities?
JC: Input is the first publicly listed agricultural streaming company. Shares were floated at $1.60 and have since risen to $2.61. So we know there is investor interest; investors have seen the success of companies streaming other commodities. That said, I think there are investors waiting to see how well Input executes.
Input offers a quicker return. If you invest in Input, every year you get crops. It doesn't have to be canola. For example, a farmer facing a supply shortfall in canola can repay Input in other crops. I wouldn't be surprised should other companies pop up to follow Input's lead.
TMR: The company closed a bought-deal offering of $46M on July 18. This was oversubscribed by $6M, which indicates a fair degree of institutional confidence, correct?
JC: The financing confirms that Input is seeing more interest from farmers seeking to engage in streaming contracts. The company said in its last quarterly result that the pipeline of potential customers looks strong, having been boosted by the rail delays and attendant problems. We believe that when Input begins to deploy its new capital to further streaming contracts, this will further improve investor confidence.
TMR: To sum up, how do you rate the investor prospects for the fertilizer sector as opposed to other commodities?
JC: There are a limited number of players in this sector compared to other commodities. The fertilizer sector boasts of bellwether companies that offer good yields and demonstrate consistent growth. This makes them a pretty safe harbor for investors.
In talking to investors, we have heard that many have switched from other basic-material commodities to fertilizer companies because farmers need to use fertilizers year in and year out. This offers stability and explains why the fertilizer sector has held up reasonably well year-to-date despite the recent somewhat soft fertilizer market globally.
TMR: John, thank you for your time and your insights.
This interview was conducted by Kevin Michael Grace of The Mining Report and can be read in its entirety here.
John Chu, CFA, is managing director of Agri-Industry Institutional Equity Research at AltaCorp Capital Inc. He was previously senior vice president in agriculture and industrials research at Mackie Research Capital and also worked for Scotia Capital and HSBC Securities. He holds a Bachelor of Arts with Honors in economics from Queens University and a Master of Business Administration from the University of Western Ontario.
Want to read more Mining Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you'll learn when new articles have been published. To see recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Streetwise Interviews page.
1) Kevin Michael Grace conducted this interview for Streetwise Reports LLC, publisher of The Gold Report, The Energy Report, The Life Sciences Report and The Mining Report, and provides services to Streetwise Reports as an independent contractor. He owns, or his family owns, shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None.
2) The following companies mentioned in the interview are sponsors of Streetwise Reports: None. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services.
3) John Chu: I own, or my family owns, shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I personally am, or my family is, paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. AltaCorp Capital is a market maker for the following companies mentioned in this interview: Agrium Inc. AltaCorp Capital was involved in an equity financing for Input Capital Corp. I was not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my own comments and opinions. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview.
4) Interviews are edited for clarity. Streetwise Reports does not make editorial comments or change experts' statements without their consent.
6) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise during the up-to-four-week interval from the time of the interview until after it publishes.
Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it. The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Editor's Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major U.S. exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.