High Yield Dividend ETFs - A Tale Of The Tape

|
Includes: HDV, PEY, SDY, VYM
by: Aaron Barton

Summary

These high-yield dividend ETFs offer greater yield than S&P 500.

ETFs offer greater diversification than individual stocks.

Unlike mutual funds, ETFs can be traded throughout the day.

"Do you know the only thing that gives me pleasure? It's to see my dividends coming in."
- John D. Rockefeller (as quoted by John Lewis in Cosmopolitan)

Dividends are a beautiful thing. They are the portion of earnings that the board of directors decides to pay to shareholders. You can use dividends to purchase additional shares under a dividend reinvestment plan, have them deposited back into your brokerage account, or sent to you in the form of a check.

While some view dividend paying companies as less risky than those who reinvest all earnings, others see dividends as an illusion, arguing that dividends are not tax efficient and pointing out that removing capital from a company could impact future profits or earnings ability.

I view dividends as an amusing consequence of investing in companies that generally produce more cash than they need to fund ongoing operations. While I prefer dividend paying companies to non-payers, my bias is generally routed in the emotional side of personal finance and investing rather than some fundamental thesis that a portfolio of dividend payers is superior to the alternative. Much is said on Seeking Alpha about dividends and dividend paying stocks. But far less is said about their better diversified and arguably more fundamentally sound counterparts, dividend-oriented ETFs. I think most people like to own individual stocks rather than ETFs because it makes them feel they are somehow more connected to their investing strategy. They can read earnings releases, pore over 10-Qs and 10-Ks, lament on insider trading, and all the other things that investors like to do to feel a connection to their portfolio.

In this article I will give up those dividend investing birthrights, and take a comprehensive and quantitative approach to analyzing four "high-yield" dividend ETFs to determine if the hands off approach has the merits fundamentally embedded ETF investing.

Profiling the contenders (unless otherwise stated, market prices, NAV and SEC yield as of 1/23/15):

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSEARCA:VYM)

This ETF seeks to track the performance of the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, which measures the investment return of common stocks of companies characterized by high dividend yield.

  • Market price: $68.74
  • 30-day SEC Yield: 2.93%
  • Number of holdings: 392

iShares Core High Dividend ETF (NYSEARCA:HDV)

This ETF seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of relatively high dividend paying U.S. equities.

  • Market price: $77.34
  • 30-day SEC Yield: 3.45%
  • Number of holdings: 78

Powershares High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers Portfolio ETF (NASDAQ:PEY)

This ETF is based on the NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers 50 Index and will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in dividend paying stocks that comprise the index.

  • Market price: $13.51
  • 30-day SEC Yield: 3.21%
  • Number of holdings: 50

SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (NYSEARCA:SDY)

This ETF seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P 500 High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index.

  • Market price $79.32
  • 30-day SEC Yield: 2.19%
  • Number of holdings: 98

1) Diversification

Diversification is the process of reducing non-systematic risk by investing in a variety of assets or asset classes that (hopefully) do not move up or down in value at the same time or magnitude. As the 2008 financial crisis taught us, there are certain unforeseeable events (think global recession, world wars) that no amount of diversification can protect us from. Despite this qualifier, I still prefer the perceived spreading of risk as opposed to the all-eggs-in-one-basket watched very closely mentality.

a) Number of holdings

While more isn't necessarily better, too little can be not enough. In general, there are eight sectors or broad categories of businesses: Basic Materials, Services, Conglomerates, Consumer Goods, Financial, Technology, Healthcare, Industrial Goods and Utilities. Within each sector is a number of industries (Consumer Goods includes beverages and office supplies, Services includes auto dealerships and airlines). According to Yahoo, there are roughly 190 industry categories. An ETF need not be comprised of companies in every industry, since certain common economic factors are primary drivers across unrelated industries. Think general contractors and residential builders performing well during a housing boom.

Winner: Vanguard's quantity of holdings is sufficient to represent an investment in every major industry category nearly twice over. While it has a hefty stake in Apple, which is tough to call high yielding at less than 2%, it still has a broad base of companies that is almost four times larger than the runner up, SPDR.

b) Sector Representation

Vanguard High Dividend Yield Sector Allocation (Courtesy of Vanguard)

iShares Core High Dividend Yield Sector Allocation (Courtesy of Blackrock)

Powershares High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers (Courtesy of Invesco)

SPDR S&P Dividend ETF Sector Allocation (Courtesy of State Street Global Advisors)

Winner: Vanguard. All three other funds have at least 20% of their holdings concentrated in a single sector. Not so for Vanguard, who limits their sector exposure to 18.10%. What is interesting to note, and should be reviewed by investors based on their own personal preferences and profiles, is that even though these funds all have the same general approach, (high-yield and diversification), their composition is quite different. With the exception of Consumer Goods/Staples (which is the second largest sector for each) sector weighting is all over the map. Utilities makes up less than 10% of the Vanguard ETF, but is over 25% for Powershares. iShares has less than 1% Financials, but for SPDR, Financials make up its most significant holdings.

2) Fees

Fees are important, that goes without saying. But unlike actively managed funds, with fees that average nearly .9%, ETFs as a whole are considered low-cost alternatives. But even with their general cost effectiveness compared to managed alternatives, it is still worth looking into which fees of index funds to make sure you keep as much of your hard earned money as possible.

Winner: Vanguard. No surprise here. Vanguard's low-cost approach to investing is something the company is very proud of. Honorable mention to iShares, which is within striking distance of Vanguard and three and four times cheaper than SPDR and Powershares, respectively.

3) Total return

HDV Total Return Price Chart

HDV Total Return Price data by YCharts

Winner: Powershares. Past performance does not guarantee future results, and these ETFs are designed to primarily track an index. But at the end of the day, over the past five years, PEY has outperformed its competition from 8% to nearly 20%.

4) Liquidity

The ability to get out of a great investment is just as important as the ability to get in. While ETFs are generally regarded as having higher liquidity than mutual funds (primarily because they can be traded throughout the day, rather than just at the end), there are reasons to avoid ETFs with excessively low volume. Chief among these are higher bid-ask spreads, which may result in the inability to profitably execute a short-term trade (not a real issue for long-term investors). However, one of the issues that arises from low liquidity (a deviation between price and NAV) can actually be an opportunity. If an ETF is trading slightly below its NAV, but the market is not active enough for it to quickly resume equilibrium, you can shave a few points off your basis by looking for opportune entry points.

Winner: SPDR. More volume means better pricing (both in relation to NAV and narrow bid/ask spreads).

Honorable mention everybody else. All of these ETFs provide adequate liquidity to be considered both investable and tradeable.

5) Price/earnings multiple

Winner: Vanguard. It is trading at a discount both to its high dividend ETF peers but also to the S&P 500, NASDAQ and Dow Jones Industrial average.

6) Yield

Winner: iShares. While all but SPDR best the 30-year Treasury yield, none of these ETFs beat the 6 stock semi-weekly dividend portfolio I wrote about recently.

So, which high yield dividend should you own?

Vanguard! The low-cost investing house has outdone itself with its Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF. It has assembled a large, diverse group of stocks that pay above average dividends at rock-bottom fees trading at a reasonable price/earnings multiple.

While yield is not the end-all be-all of investing, for those with assets that need income, a high-yield dividend ETF can be a perfect way to get diversified equity exposure without hitching your wagon to just a handful of stocks.

A word of caution:

Do your homework. Monitor your holdings. Just because one of these funds is right for your portfolio right now, doesn't mean it will stay that way forever. Depending on rebalancing frequency, a large run up in price of an individually large stock or sector can result in a fund that is incompatible with your goals or risk preferences.

Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.