Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

How Gold, Silver And Platinum Will Respond To ECB's Money Printing

Dec. 22, 2011 3:00 PM ETPPLT, GLD, SLV, SIVR, HL, NEM64 Comments
Avery Goodman profile picture
Avery Goodman
2.08K Followers

Today, about 490 billion euros ($637 billion) worth of ultra-low interest "loans" will be delivered to European banks. This cash has been provided courtesy of the ECB, which denies that it will ever engage in printing money, like the Americans, Britons and Japanese have now done for many years. The "loans" are for a 3-year period. In return for the cash, the ECB accepts various forms of "collateral," which includes the debt of insolvent southern European sovereigns. This is the largest uptake of cash in the history of the European Union, including the cash given out by the ECB after the collapse of Lehman Brothers.

This is merely the first of a series of so-called long-term refinancing operations (LTRO) the ECB is going to undertake. These are unlimited tenders of cash. The banks call the shots. Any amount they ask for will be given to them, subject only to the availability of collateral. The next tender is scheduled for February 28, 2012, and many are predicting that it will generate an equal or greater demand for cash among euro-banks. The stated intent is to provide liquidity to banks at a time of great stress for the eurozone. The unstated expectation is that part of the cash will be used to shore up balance sheets, and another to replace or buy more bonds from troubled sovereigns of the eurozone, including, particularly, Italy and Spain.

The maturity time for the "loans" is long enough to cover banks until the maturity of many of the sovereign bonds banks might purchase. A bank can now borrow from the ECB at 1% per year for 3 years, invest in a 3-year Italian bond paying 6% plus, and pocket 5% each year in pure profit. That is an enticing proposition. But, the end game is much more lucrative than that. Today's cash delivery is only the first of

This article was written by

Avery Goodman profile picture
2.08K Followers
Avery B. Goodman is a licensed attorney and the author of the action-packed Wall Street thriller "The Synod". He holds a B.A. from Emory University, where he concentrated on history and economics. He also holds a Juris Doctorate degree from the University of California at Los Angeles Law School and is a member of the Bar, licensed to practice law in several jurisdictions. His career has consisted not only of prosecuting cases on behalf of clients, but in judging the claims of others. He serves he roster of neutral arbitrators of the National Futures Association (NFA) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

Recommended For You

Comments (64)

diana palmer profile picture
Hello Avery,

I have a few questions that I really need the answers for, I do not know who can give me reliable answers here. I am forwarding them to SA contributors who I follow and know to be knowledgeable and see if the answers are helpful...

1. Where can I find the latest set of collateral that can be acceptable for LTRO phase 2. And what are the related haircuts in each case? Who, among all SA contributors will be an expert on these issues?

2. Can the European banks buy US treasuries as use them as a collateral?

3. Can they buy gold and use it as collateral? Can they buy corporate bonds?

4. It is up to the respective Central Banks to decide if the banks in their country can participate in the LTRO phase2 with the relaxed collateral conditions, correct? So the liabilities won't be shared proportionally among the respective central banks...right? If that's the case then, are we heading towards a system with two layers - top one composing of CBs not participating in the LTRO phase 2 (like the German banks) and other (like French and Italian banks) participating in it? What are the implications here?

5.What are the new instruments that are acceptable as collateral in LTRO phase2, which was not acceptable in LTRO phase1?
p
Something to think about is that before we got to this apocalyptic collapse of the money, the Fed would have to unload its gold. All 8000 tons of it. How would you feel about owning gold when there was a seller in the market unloading 8000 tons of it?
Stilldazed profile picture
The government doesn't own silver, sold it all in the 1980's, just sayin.
indianamark profile picture
How about the Fed holding on to the gold for the revaluation?

We still have 8,000 tons? It hasn't been audited since the 50's/
Hollywood65 profile picture
The Fed,legally should not have any Gold bullion. It should be held by the U.S. Treasury,which is a Gubamint agency,answerable to Congress. That being said, Ft Knox[U.S. Treasury controlled]has been rumored to have just dust inside. The U.S.Fed Reserve Bank of New York does supposedly hold 262 million ounces transferred to its vaults by the U.S.Treasury. Why American citizens gold was transferred to a Private Bank,with NO accountability,is not known,as far as I can tell.
They should give it BACK!
p
if dollar crashes when to sell gold before or after new currency.
K
This interesting article makes the recent ECB-bazooka (LTRO) look like it were the best thing since sliced bread.

There are some embarrassing mistakes in Goodman's calculations when he suggests that a bank, after 1 year of participating in bimonthly LTROs, can earn about 30% in spread interest. His (wrong) conclusion is based on the assumption that banks can borrow from the ECB at 1% and buy Italian bonds yielding 6%. Yes, that is a 5% spread but doing that 6 times per year does not increase the spread; in only increases the volume to which the 5% spread applies. And, by the same logic, there certainly is not a 90% return on investment after 3 years!

Sadly, Goodman is perfectly right in saying the following: "If a bank participates to the fullest extent possible in the back door money printing, its executives will have collected fat bonus checks from big profits made on sovereign debt".

The LTROs are a way of providing banks with below-market-rate funding so that banks can increase their spreads leading to higher profits. If such profits were retained, they would strengthen the capital base of the banks which would be one way to justify this kind of subsidy (or slow-motion bail-out). If such profits are paid out as bonuses for executives and/or dividends, the ECB would be subsidizing executives' and/or shareholders' incomes.

What is left out of all these considerations is the issue of risk. So far, auditors have allowed banks to carry their sovereign risk assets at nominal value. Regulators have even called for that (Basel-II). However, even if all the sovereign debt will eventually return to full value again (a highly optimistic assumption), it is quite likely that banks will be required to make some risk provisions for these assets sooner or later. A bank which has to make a 10% risk provision on, say, Italian bonds has just wiped out 2 years' of spread interest through active utilization of the LTRO.
The EconomicJoker profile picture
I'm calling for everyone to sell their gold and silver ONLY 30% higher than paper prices. We will make our own physical market!
P
Absolutely Tuck, as Jefferson stated ' a nations citizens have 2 enemies, 1] common criminals 2] the government '...this is as true today as it ever was.... The Bankster Gangsters and the Politicos are running amuck with Monetization of Debt and deluded Fiscal policys globally...if ever there was a time to buy bullion and take physical receipt, this is it...
t
It's crystal clear that ZIRP and QE are about propping up banking cartels and supporting gov borrowing and hence spending.

The GovFeds want to maintain or increase their claims and control over the wealth of society and pay out less to the public.

Pay out less in interest, benefits, and via the inflation dodge. But inflation can only be part of the scheme. If this money printing were unleashed into the general economy to employ inflation as the primary mechanism, the currency skirmishes, trade skirmishes, economic skirmishes would erupt into full scale war.

The public sort of understands taxes despite every deceptive trick possible being employed.

The public sort of understands inflation. That's been gamed as well.

How do you get the public to understand QE and ZIRP?

How do you get the public to understand the shell game? Borrowing was pitched as the "cure" for the negative effects of high taxes. Now higher taxes and/or reduced benefits are the "cure for the negative effects of high borrowing. Oh but guess what, the borrowing isn't stopping or even slowing down.

How do you get the public to understand they are paying with reduced living standards, less opportunity, less economic mobility? I don't think you can. Too few people can connect the dots. Too many want to believe they are benefiting. People with institutional power are fine with the status quo. And going 3 steps backwards to go 4 steps forward just requires too much courage (read any) and imagination.
Jake Towne profile picture
Dear Avery -
Provided that the central banks can increase this facility at any given time, why do you write "Today's cash delivery is only the first of many 3-year LTRO events that will happen every two months this year." as if it is fact? Are these 2 month events now officially scheduled or is this conjecture on your part?

Per the press release, my understanding is that only two LTRO events are planned, and both expire 3 years from the first operations'

See http://bit.ly/rUy9An
untrusting investor profile picture
JT,
Exactly correct per the ECB press release. Only two LTRO events by the ECB have been announced, not many which is pure conjecture and misinformation by this article's author.
Avery Goodman profile picture
Sorry if I was less than clear. If you go to the ECB website, you will find that it defines an MRO as a "main refinancing operation" and an LTRO as a so-called "longer-term refinancing operation". Longer-term refinancing can mean a number of things, but, at this moment, I believe they are talking about 1 or 3 year repos.

The next unlimited 3 year operation is scheduled for the end of February. However, the ECB has LTROs scheduled for the end of every single month of 2012. It has not specified, or I cannot find information on the specification, as to what the exact lengths of those other LTROs are going to be.

I have stated that the 3 year version is likely to happen every two months, but they could happen more often, or 1 or 2 year or, even 5 year, versions could happen in between the others. It is impossible to predict exactly right now. But, even when banks have borrowed for 1 year, from the ECB, they have always been able to renew and roll over the loans when they came due, as well as expanding them.

One thing is clear. There is NO REASON to have added such incredibly long repo terms if this were not designed to help banks buy European sovereign debt. I am assuming, and I think it is a reasonable assumption, that ultra-long term money is going to be freely available until sovereigns are able to sell enough bonds to "stabilize" the Euro-zone core.

In other words, I expect the banks to be supplied with sufficient cash to buy as many bonds as sovereigns would have liked to sell to the ECB, if direct sales were not prohibited. That is more money than might have been supplied to the market if the ECB were buying directly, because the banks are also likely to want and use some cash to shore up their balance sheets.
pdtor profile picture
Of course you are right, they cannot bold face announce that they will print $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ and give it to the banks at will, as that would defeat the purpose of the plan, as investors would figure out the ultimate agenda, and rush to gold, and sink the Euro in a week. They need to be opaque, and not divulge what they are really doing. It is for us to figure out, and act accordingly. If you think they will be successful, back and invest in the Euro, if you doubt them, your bet is gold.

The market will be the final arbitrator who is right, though it may take some time
Herve Jacques profile picture
Agree with the author about Wall Street "groupthink" being wrong on the impact of the LTRO. It will be meaningful.
I disagree on the bond buying. Banks have a myriad of assets to invest in to get a nice positive carry out of those 489 billion euros, not the least lending to the real economy.
I therefore disagree as well on the idea of piling up on bonds to the tune of trillions of euros and on the idea of the mega inflation: we are in a global de-leveraging storm which makes inflation the least of all worries.
Finally, my take on gold is different: what got the gold price to $2000 is in good part the leveraged play of hedgies and short term traders. If so, global de-leveraging will impact them as it has others. I am very doubtful that recent highs can be sustained while industrial and jewelry demands falter.
t
I would demand a refund on your world map, globe, atlas. Asia and S. America are fairly significant omissions.

The net from LTRO is 210 billion euros. 82 billion has been deposited with the ECB.

I find it difficult to believe that there isn't a gentleman's agreement to earmark a portion for gov bonds.

I think more specificity is required concerning wonderful lending opportunities.

Foreign govs have already taken several telling actions against "printing imperialism". I can't see the EMU receiving a special dispensation.
P
Herve you are obiously undersetimating the Asian culture and as was stated earlier their historical preference for Gold. Their impact on the global market is a sea change now. They are buying this correction BIG time. The BIG Asian buyers are in many cases now buying directly from producers and circumventing the traditional brokerage system. When PAGE opens in June 2012 the Crimex and LMBA will lose their status as a price discovery mechanism. There is already a widening gap in the valuation of paper and physical gold and silver. The bullion bankster gangsters and the Crimex manipulations are coming to an end...PMs will be trending much higher in these next few years...
p
You are correct Physical. Idiot investors need to sell their GLD and SLV and Buy physical Gold and Silver. Then they will see their investment go thru the roof because they have gone to PHYSICAL PM versus Paper gld and slv.
p
This looks like worldwide Ponzi on heroin to me. What will trigger the collapse?
Hollywood65 profile picture
Just about ANY event will now! Another earthquake, near a Developed economy? Greece leaving the EU by March 20th[and they will]. Economic collapses are ALWAYS denied,as not possible,until,suddenly, they happen. THEN EVERYONE says,of course we saw it coming! Watch CNBC Market pundits. They are a riot!
Davis Waldo profile picture
As a perma platinum bull I always enjoy knowing I have the company of at least one other person. Let me add something to the platinum story. The 20% takedown in the platinum price since September was accompanied by a 20% fall in the rand, making this revenue neutral for SA producers. One can imagine that this fall in the rand was due to forced liquidation by French and other banks of higher yielding SA debt due to balance sheet detererioration as their S European bonds went S. Now that their impaired bonds are going to be replaced by ready cash, I assume they will go searching for yield once again in SA debt, and the rand will go all the way back up. Already there has been a 3% rise in the rand in three days. (8.4-8.12)/8.4. This has been accompanied by a $25 dollar rise in Pt or 1.8%. So, Pt has another 1.2% to go short-term and another 17% to go once full liquification of Euro debt occurs.
Hollywood65 profile picture
I have a problem with Platinum,paladium metals due to the HIGH industrial usage, in catalytic converters and such. So goes the economies[manufactuiring] so goes the price of them. Silver has this problem also, but does have one thing they don't. A WELL recognized historical currency component, neither of the P metals do.
C
Are there any effectice mechanisms which prevent Italy and other idebted nations to increase their debt to GDP-ratios under this new ECB program?
C
Are there any effective mechanisms which prevent Italy and other idebted nations from increasing their debt to GDP-levels under this new ECB program?
t
Foreign players.

They are the key on where the "liquidity" actually goes. To gov bonds and parked with the ECB or general economy and possible attempts at foreign "investment"?

With the US, UK, EMU taking the money printing gloves off, it doesn't take a genius to see that you could be plundered quite easily if it were allowed. The weakest hands most sensitive to price fluctuations have already run into a spot of trouble. Like losing power and being forced to run for their lives. If they're smart that is.

I seriously doubt that direct investment is in the cards. As to the question of acquiring foreign natural resources and labor via consumer channels? That will have to be monitored closely or there will be consequences.
flash9 profile picture
The ironic thing is that the incredibly deflationary forces of monstrous debt loads are causing incredibly inflationary counter measures. Is there any limit to how far they will go? Since hyperinflation causes institutional changes and dusting off the guillotines, I think so but have been wrong so far.
pdtor profile picture
You get it
Dorky profile picture
Sounds like another temptation to accept cheap money. I wonder how long can such a game lasts. I understand this is something that must be perpetuated continuously to work, or else imagine if the banks stop buying and the yields go back up. Then the banks' balance sheet with all those tons of sovereign debts will be in deep mess, necessitating further sovereign debt buying and further ECB funding.

So I guess if the banks voluntarily participate in this game, then they will have to do the debt buying continuously in a very regulated manner, as they cannot buy too fast (balance sheet expanding too fast with toxic debts) or too slow (balance sheet collapse with rising yields). If I am right in this, then I guess these European banks are like trying to run a nuclear power plant, where a slight operation mistake will lead to meltdown.

Truly dangerous.

What if the ECB suddenly pull the plug? Touching a bit on conspiracy here, I believe the IMF, the Fed and the ECB are all privately owned by elite bankers like the Rothschilds, with the objective to transfer all the public wealth into their own. That's why ECB just a while ago suggested Germany and Italy to pledge their gold reserves to secure more loans. So if the ECB finally pull out this LTRO funding, how will that going to impact the banks that loaded up as much as sovereign debt as possible, as tempted by ECB's cheap money? I understand it will be complete collapse down to exact zero (or maybe even subzero). Then maybe the ECB will declare that since it holds all those debt collateral, thus it should have possession of the entire Eurozone nations, including their gold reserves.

What a great plan to rob the public.

All those mafias really got into the wrong mob.

Every financial crisis always begin with cheap money. The banks are in a very tight situation to make a choice - "should I choose to make 30% a year, or should I soon to declare insolvency?" An ECB satan-worshipping representative would suggest the banks to just choose to enjoy the 30% return a year and leave whatever future mess to the next generations.
----------------------
"But, at the very least, the free availability of cash over the next 3 years will make commercial and personal loans, including loans to buy automobiles and capital equipment, very easy to come by. Production of cars, trucks, airplanes, etc. are not going to nosedive, but are likely to increase. "

Richard Koo and many others have brilliantly explained that we will experience a coming age of deleveraging, where people and corporations will no longer have the capability to borrow further, where people and corporations will take time to pay off their debts to repair their balance sheet. So how in the world will we see another increase in production?

When you have borrowed so much that your income barely covers the interest alone, do you think it is wise to borrow further? Do you think you will escape default? What if everyone face the same debt problem as you? How will the economy ends up?
pdtor profile picture
Although European elite are very greedy and corrupt, I cannot agree with your conspiracy theories, as the elite are not that stupid. It is true they can steal and manipulate the economy to get all the gold in Europe. Remember that real power is not GOLD, but what it will buy. Look to history, to how it will play out, see French revolution, to see how that works out. They may have all the gold, we have the hot lead. If you think I am wrong, look at the Arab world, how is all the gold and power playing out?
Hollywood65 profile picture
I highly recommend Charles C Coppes book: America's Financial Reckoning Day. AFTER reading it, with the Facts it contains, I believe you will change your mind re a Conspiracy.
There is info re Central Banking and the Fed reserve,Fiscal Bankruptcy & collapse of America,Pol Paradigms and personal and Financial considerations in light of the info presented.
Remember that wealth is only a means to and end for the Elite. What they desire is POWER/CONTROL,and THAT is their aim. Enough POWER to control the world. This book spells out their agenda,and methodology to do so.
pdtor profile picture
Thanks Hollywood, i will get book, just ordered The Creature from Jeckyll Island, which is about monitory manipulation and why the Fed was formed, should be good reading over the holidays
untrusting investor profile picture
If this author thinks Germany will permit significant inflation, then he is nuts. Germany will leave the euro before that happens, and if the ECB tries otherwise, then it will find out how quickly Germany can act.
Avery Goodman profile picture
In three years, it is more than likely that Angela Merkel and her conservatives will be gone, and the opposition in power. The opposition is very Euro-oriented, and will bend over backwards to accommodate the ECB, even if it chooses to do overt QE. Meanwhile, this backdoor QE will kick the can long enough down the road for this to happen.

Germany may eventually create its own national currency to offset the outcry from its people, but not until a lot of actual price-oriented inflation happens, and not just due to the precursor, which is "monetary inflation". The new Mark is likely to be jointly legal tender with the Euro, inside Germany, with Germany nominally "staying" inside the Euro-zone. That won't happen, however, for many years.

The process of recreating a currency will take 5-10 years. During that period, the Euro will be worth progressively less and less in buying power, just like its paper dollar/pound counterparts. The European money supply will be dramatically and permanently increased, and a lot of Euros will be used to buy precious metals. At the end of all this commotion, in fact, gold may well end up, once again, as the only reserve currency, and the anchor of world finance.
pdtor profile picture
Thanks AG for your insight, which I concur,your arguments have put meat on the bones of my argument, that what they are doing is $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$... in spite of Germany,s reluctance to inflate. Short term gain, for long term pain always works in politics. So why is gold so soft? I get it, gold is manipulated, it just gives me a chance to double down at a better price, until the rest of the herd figure it out.
Love your work

Merry Christmas and Happy Gold New year to all
Hollywood65 profile picture
I have a question. Why will the Process of recreating a cuurency take 5-10 years? More details of this Process would be appreciated.
Thanks
B
It never ceases to amaze me how many ways can be argued for the future price of gold and silver to go up - most of those appear to ignore the realities such as hedge fund gold liquidation programs to offset performance hedge models, or that euro banks will actually use the funds to rollover and replace existing higher cost loans, or that liquidity and economic growth that attract stock market investment trends tend to suppress gold prices.
Tack profile picture
Blob:

You've got it.

There's so much money, now, congested into gold, Treasuries and cash that as soon as greater liquidity in Europe works its way through the system, it becomes obvious, even to casual observers, that Europe is not going to collapse, then, money will suddenly be looking for more risk and higher returns. Then, the run on all "safety" assets will swing into full gear.

Eventually, greater monetary velocity, coupled with expanded currency, may trigger higher levels of inflation and, perhaps, provide some support for gold, but in the shorter term, gold will sell down briskly.
pdtor profile picture
Tack
You got it, risk on time to buy US equities for now, but look for gold somewhere down the road
indianamark profile picture
The C M E criminal enterprise has been exposed. Today's volume in silver set a record low 21,000. Back in April 20,000 would change hands in 30 minutes.

Jon, 'I'm stunned', Corzine can't remember what happened to the $1.2 billion, but the traders remember how the customers of M F Global had their money stolen.

The precipitous drop off in volume indicates a lot of people decided to let the crooks steal from each other.
harryjack profile picture
Venerability, you are on it again. People liquidated gold to sugar coat their awful mutual fund performances.
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!

Related Stocks

SymbolLast Price% Chg
PPLT--
abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF
GLD--
SPDR® Gold Shares ETF
SLV--
iShares Silver Trust ETF
SIVR--
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
HL--
Hecla Mining Company

Related Analysis

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.