Chinese Gold Holdings Surprise Investors, But Is It Bullish Or Bearish?

Hebba Investments profile picture
Hebba Investments


  • The recent Chinese announcement that the nation had updated its gold reserves to 1,658 tonnes took analysts by surprise as everyone expected a lot more.
  • The bears argue that this means the Chinese simply are not very interested in gold.
  • The bulls argue that this means the Chinese have a lot more gold to buy.
  • We side with the bulls here because we believe that the Chinese want to continue to improve the Yuan's credibility and that means more gold reserves.

China recently ended much speculation concerning its gold holdings as it finally declared how much gold it was officially holding. China revealed that it had boosted bullion assets to 53.31 million troy ounces, or about 1,658 metric tons, the People's Bank of China said in a statement Friday. That's up from 1,054 tons in 2009, when it last updated the figures. The U.S. has the biggest reserves at 8,133.5 tons, data from the World Gold Council show.

Why did that surprise investors? Most analysts were calling for a much larger increase in gold holdings. As Mark O'Byrne, executive director of Dublin-based brokerage GoldCore Ltd, said, "People were expecting that they have bought a lot more. That's why we haven't seen much of a movement so far today. The big question is whether they now continue buying."

With that surprise lies both the bullish and bearish arguments for gold related to Chinese central bank buying. Before we give the two arguments we must emphasize that we are assuming that the Chinese data is accurate, but when it comes to gold nations rarely play their cards transparently. For example, the Chinese government could have plenty of "unofficial" accounts where they are accumulating gold and not choosing to disclose it until a future date where it is more strategic.

But for the sake of this piece we will assume the Chinese government is telling us the truth and all official gold is disclosed.

The Bearish Argument

The bears argue that the Chinese should have increased gold by a much greater margin and since they did not, then that means that they are much more lukewarm towards gold than many of the gold bulls think. That also means that investors should not count on the Chinese government to accumulate gold at a greater rate going forward - they are accumulating but not too fast.

The bears argue that if this is the case, then gold investors cannot count on the Chinese to support the gold price, and they will be a relatively small buyer relative to total gold production as they have only accumulated 600 tonnes in six years.

The Bullish Argument

The bulls argue that this is a bullish development as the Chinese only have 1,658 metric tonnes of gold rather than the 3,000-4,000 that analysts were projecting. We know the Chinese want to increase the world use of the Yuan, and an important part of giving a currency credibility is having gold reserves to back it.

Source: IMF Data

Based on the above data from the IMF (Chinese gold reserves have not been updated), the Chinese still have a long way to go to catch up to the US and some other European nations. That means that they have to buy at least 2,000 tonnes to catch up to Germany (and the Euro) or a tremendous 7,000 tonnes to catch up to the US. For the bulls this means that the Chinese still have plenty of gold buying left, and regardless of investors demand, they will be an important support for physical gold purchases.

Our Stance

We favor the bullish side here as we think that the Chinese do want to eventually push the Yuan up the currency importance ladder and that requires gold. After all it is no coincidence that the US hasn't officially sold an ounce of gold in decades (we will not discuss gold leasing here) and maintains its gold holdings at more than double the second highest gold holder. Additionally, the major European nations continue to hold their gold, with the most powerful, Germany, being the largest gold holder.

Finally, we take a similar stance to Alan Greenspan who recently wrote that he believes it is clear the Chinese are accumulating gold and eventually want to buy enough gold to replace the United States as the largest gold holder. He also argues that it wouldn't be that much of a gamble:

"But the penalty for being wrong, in terms of lost interest and the cost of storage, would be modest. For the rest of the world, gold prices would certainly rise, but only during the period of accumulation. They would likely fall back once China reached its goal."

To accumulate the remaining 7,000 tonnes of gold that it needs at current gold prices, it would take around $250 billion dollars. While that is a lot of money to most nations, it would only be a fraction of the nation's almost $4 trillion in currency reserves and it would mean that gold would represent a little under 10% foreign exchange reserves - a much smaller percentage than the US, Germany, and France.

Thus it is our stance that today's announcement, if accurate, means that the Chinese have a lot more gold buying to do. Thus despite gold's recent plunge, we think it is prudent that investors take the contrarian position here and build gold positions by increasing exposure to physical gold and the gold ETFs (SPDR Gold Shares (GLD), PHYS, CEF). In the short term, good miners also may see a greater rise in share price simply on the expected rise in the gold price so investors seeking leverage may want to consider evaluating gold miners such as Goldcorp (GG), Agnico-Eagle (AEM), Newmont (NEM), or even some of the explorers and silver miners such as Tahoe Resources (TAHO) or Pan American Silver (PAAS) - though we're not suggesting these companies specifically but only suggesting them for further investor research.

Sentiment is extremely bearish right now, but the good news is that the Chinese have plenty more gold to accumulate.

This article was written by

Hebba Investments profile picture
I'm an asset manager at Hebba Alternative Investments with a focus on real assets. In my articles I like to focus on events that affect the macro environment for assets (especially gold and silver), and also introduce readers to different metrics that I believe are under-utilized when assessing investments. On a more personal note, I'm a firm believer that there can be honesty, morality, and integrity in finance (though its rare) and i'd like to believe that I stick to those principles. Thus I never "pump and dump" stocks, I always list the securities we own, and I take it very seriously when I recommend a company - I do not want to see any investors/readers lose money because of my recommendations. I'm not always right with recommendations, but investors and readers can know that I always tell the truth (there is no deception) and I eat my own cooking as recommendations are either always owned OR the reason I dont own them is given (usually related to restrictions on stocks I can buy). Advising people in financial matters is a serious issue and integrity is much more important than money to me, but I do believe both can co-exist. You live with money, but after your death you only have your morality and integrity and thus i've made my choice between the two. A bit philosophical for a bio, but I dont think there's a better way to give investors my background than that. We offer investors a free weekly email list detailing gold, silver, and general economic markets which you can sign up for at:

Disclosure: I am/we are long TAHO, SGOL. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Recommended For You

Comments (67)

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.