Regular contributor Michael Pollaro offers three more charts which tell a story that's both disturbing and apparently misunderstood by a lot of mainstream analysts.
The US trade deficit (exports minus imports) has been getting smaller. Since a trade deficit subtracts from GDP growth, a shrinking deficit will, other things being equal, produce a bigger, faster-growing economy (that's the mainstream take).
But other things aren't equal. It turns out that the components of that trade balance figure are both shrinking. Exports - the stuff we sell to foreigners - have been declining since the dollar spiked in 2014. That's not a surprise, since a strengthening currency makes exports more expensive, and thus, harder to sell. So other countries are buying less of our stuff, which, though not surprising, is a bad sign.
Meanwhile, imports - stuff we buy from abroad - have also plunged in the past year, which is partly due to cheaper oil lowering the dollar value of energy and other commodity imports. But it also means that even though French wine and German cars have become less expensive as the dollar has soared against the euro, we're not buying more of them. So, US consumers, even with all the money they're saving at the gas pump, still can't (or won't) take advantage of a sale on imported goods.
If imports and exports are both falling, that means consumption is weak pretty much everywhere. And weak consumption means slow or negative growth, which contradicts the recovery thesis that now dominates policymaking and the financial media.
It also makes last week's market turmoil easier to understand. Falling trade means lower corporate profits, which, if history is still a valid guide, means less valuable equities. So, it could be that the markets are simply figuring this out and revaluing assets accordingly.