Beyond Measure: The Costs Of Terrorism

|
Includes: ACWI, ADRU, DBEU, DBEZ, DGT, DIA, EEA, EPV, EURL, EZU, FEEU, FEP, FEU, FEUZ, FEZ, FIEU, FIGY, GLQ, HACW, HEDJ, HEGE, HEZU, HFEZ, HFXE, HGEU, IEIL, IEUR, IEV, QQQ, RGRO, RWV, SBEU, SPY, UPV, VGK, VT, WBIL
by: Kristina Hooper

Last week saw terrorism strike two more cities with the tragic attacks in Brussels and Lahore. Our hearts go out to the victims, their families and all the people of Belgium and Pakistan. Sadly, in the past few months we've seen terrorism deliver multiple blows to humanity. And the reality is that there have been far more terrorist attacks than just the ones that have received significant media attention. In the past few months we've seen some incredibly brazen and cowardly attacks around the world - some of which involved the targeting of children. This begs the question, "What is the cost of terrorism?"

Trying to calculate the incalculable

This is such a difficult question to answer as there are so many different costs of terrorism, from psychological to economic to political to human lives, which is of course incalculable. In terms of economic costs, there are the direct ones: the value of property damage and the cost of death and injury, including medical care and lost earnings, which is how the Institute for Economics and Peace calculates the price of terrorism.

For example, the direct cost of the September 11 attack has been estimated by multiple sources at many billions of dollars. The Comptroller of the City of New York estimated the direct cost (both physical and human) at more than $302 billion.

Then there are the indirect costs - the market and consumer responses to the terrorist acts. In the short-term, we typically see a fairly resilient stock market after an initial drop. In the short-term we also see a curtailment in consumer spending, particularly travel - as several airlines reported a significant drop in European travel following the Paris terrorist attacks. Also, several months ago, when a Russian plane appeared to be blown up by a bomb over the Sinai region of Egypt, many flights to the region were cancelled. This in turn resulted in numerous hotel and restaurant cancellations and was a major hit to Egypt's economy.

Then there is the government funding to fight terrorism, which should be added to the overall tab. Money is spent on a laundry list of items such as anti-cyberattack software and modelling, an expensive investment. According to the latest annual Global Terrorism Index produced by the Institute for Economics and Peace, in 2014 terrorist acts cost the world $52.9 billion - a number that has increased significantly over the past decade.

Terrorism's Financial Toll is Rising

The global economic costs of terrorism have
risen sharply in recent years

Chart Sources: Institute for Economics and Peace; Allianz Global Investors. Data as of 12/31/14.

The opportunity cost of anti-terrorism

While increased spending to fight terrorism is a form of fiscal spending that injects money into the economy, we must also recognize the opportunity cost of anti-terrorism spending.

That is money that arguably could be spent on endeavors with a higher return on investment, such as education, or it could result in countries taking on more debt that becomes increasingly difficult to service. Also, we typically see measures taken to prevent terrorism result in an increased burden on trade, as additional layers of security at borders add time and costs to the supply chain. We should expect costs to be passed on to consumers, with added supply-chain costs and other anti-terror actions by businesses likely to create some consumer inflation.

The recent terrorist attacks should also be viewed in terms of their ability to influence political developments. For example, the Paris and Brussels bombings could have a significant impact on the UK's decision on whether to remain part of the European Union. Interestingly, depending on the lens one looks through, these tragedies could either move the UK closer to, or further from, the European Union. On one hand, it could cause the UK to believe it can benefit from participation in the EU as clearly information sharing among countries is a critical part of being able to stop terrorism.

Alternatively it could cause the UK to believe it needs to leave the European Union in order to secure its borders; after all, in such a structure one is only as strong as its weakest link. And political ramifications of terrorism are not confined to Europe; the US presidential election could be significantly impacted by heightened terrorism concerns on the part of the electorate.

Can stocks continue to shrug-off?

So while stocks have heretofore largely shrugged off terrorist attacks, it does not mean that terrorism is inconsequential. Beyond the obvious and horrific human costs, the economic and political costs are very significant. Looking ahead, because of the geopolitical uncertainties ranging from Algeria across to Afghanistan and from Azerbaijan down to Somalia, we could see terrorism become both more frequent and possibly more dramatic.

Headlines will create volatility for the markets as well as possible gyrations in oil prices, given that many of the countries impacted by terrorism are also some of the largest producers of oil. Finally and unfortunately, many of these uncertainties seem to be difficult to resolve and so could last much longer.