FNFV Group (NYSE:FNFV)
Q1 2016 Earnings Conference Call
April 28, 2016, 12:30 PM ET
Daniel Murphy - Senior Vice President and Treasurer
William Foley - Chairman of the Board
Brent Bickett - Executive Vice President, Corporate Strategy
Anthony Park - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
John Campbell - Stephens
Chas Tyson - KBW
Jason Deleeuw - Piper Jaffray
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the 2016 first quarter earnings call. [Operator Instructions] I'd now like to turn the conference over to your host, Dan Murphy. Please go ahead.
Thank you. And thanks for joining us for our first quarter 2016 FNFV earnings conference call. Joining me today are FNF Chairman, Bill Foley; Executive Vice President, Brent Bickett; and CFO, Tony Park. Bill will begin with a brief strategic overview, and Brent will then review our portfolio of company investments, and then we'll open up for your questions and finish with some concluding remarks from Bill.
This conference call may contain forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Statements that are not historical facts including statements about our expectations, hopes, intentions or strategies regarding the future are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on management's beliefs as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to management. Because such statements are based on expectations as to future financial and operating results and are not statements of fact, actual results may differ materially from those projected.
We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The risks and uncertainties which forward-looking statements are subject to include, but are not limited to the risk and other factors detailed in our press release dated yesterday, and in the statement regarding forward-looking information, risk factors, and other sections of FNF's Form 10-K and other filings with the SEC.
This conference call will be available for replay via webcast at fnf.com. It will also be available through phone replay beginning at 2:30 PM Eastern Time today through May 5. The replay number is 800-475-6701 and the access code is 391053.
Let me now turn the call over to our Chairman, Bill Foley.
Thanks, Dan. We made one new investment and two incremental investments this quarter and continue to aggressively repurchase FNFV common stock. In January we made an aggregate $22 million investment in the debt of Colt Defense, after working on and leading the debt restructuring of Colt in 2015.
During January and February we acquired an additional 827,000 shares of Del Frisco's common stock, bringing our investment to 3 million shares for a total of $44 million or $14.53 per Del Frisco's common share. In March, we made a $47.4 million additional capital investment in Ceridian to fund the continued growth of the Dayforce product line.
Dayforce is winning in the marketplace, and this capital infusion will allow Ceridian to continue to grow the cloud-based revenue of the company even more aggressively. We're having no trouble selling the product. We simply have had an issue in terms of investing adequately to fund the development and conversion of various customers. This will solve that problem.
We also continued our share repurchase efforts in the first quarter, buying back an additional 3.2 million shares of FNFV common stock for approximately $33 million. We now repurchased a total of 23.7 million shares or approximately 26% of all shares of FNFV that we distributed to FNF shareholders in July of 2014.
We will continue to focus on the growth and financial performance of our investments, and seek to maximize the value of current and future investments for the benefit of our shareholders.
I'll now turn the call over to Brent Bickett to review the portfolio of companies.
Thank you, Bill. Ceridian HCM generated first quarter revenue of $197 million, a 0.3% increase over the first quarter of 2015, as the growth in cloud-based revenue continues to outpace the decline in the legacy core payroll business. This is a significant milestone for Dayforce and Ceridian, and we expect cloud-based revenue to continue to outpace the decline in the legacy payroll business on a go-forward basis.
EBITDA in the first quarter was $23.1 million, a $3.3 million decline versus the first quarter of 2015. In the first quarter, cloud-based revenue was $62 million, a 34% increase over the first quarter of 2015.
185 Dayforce customers were signed and 100 went live on the cloud platform during the first quarter. Live-to-date, over 2,740 customers have been signed. Ceridian's ongoing investment in the Dayforce product development, sales, marketing and implementation resources continues to impact Ceridian's EBITDA.
At the end of the first quarter, Ceridian announced that it raised a total of $150 million in new capital in the form of convertible preferred stock, and FNFV invested on a pro rata basis along with other existing Ceridian shareholders. As Bill mentioned, the additional capital will allow Ceridian to continue to invest in the growth and continue development of the Dayforce product suite.
Ceridian remains on track in its ongoing transformation into a cloud-based company, and we look forward to continued growth in Dayforce customer signings and an acceleration of customer implementations and cloud-based revenue throughout 2016.
American Blue Ribbon Holdings generated first quarter revenue of $290 million, a 1% increase versus the first quarter of 2015, after adjusting for the sale of Max & Erma's. Adjusted EBITDA was approximately $21 million, a $3 million increase or 15% over the first quarter of 2015.
Same-store sales in the aggregate decreased by 0.4%, as Ninety Nine and Bakers Square experienced same-store sales growth of 3.3% and 3.5%, respectively, offset by the 2.5% decline at O'Charley's and 1.7% decline at Village Inn.
O'Charley's decline was in line with the 2.3% decline in the Black Box comparable index. Ninety Nine's 3.3% same-store sales increase was a significant outperformance versus the Black Box index decline, and was a 12 consecutive quarter of same-store sales growth for that concept.
Bakers Square continues to perform well, as its 3.5% same-store sales growth exceeded the [ph] MPD sales track index by 2.9% or 290 basis points. Bakers Square recorded a sixth consecutive quarter of same-store sales growth. We have seen a softening in restaurants sales early in the second quarter, which we will continue to monitor.
Digital Insurance generated first quarter revenue of $36.5 million, a 31% increase over the first quarter of 2015 and adjusted EBITDA of more than $9 million, a 30% increase versus the first quarter of 2015. Adjusted EBITDA margin for the first quarter was nearly 25%.
Digital's organic growth rate accelerated to 13.6% in the first quarter with 330 basis points of this increase due to the earlier than expected receipt of carrier bonuses. The pipeline for acquisitions and potential partnerships remains robust and we remain excited about Digital's strong execution of their business plan and growing contribution to the value of FNFV.
At March 31, 2016, FNFV's book value was approximately $951 million or $13.78 per FNFV share, based on a share count of 69 million shares. This includes $112 million in holding company cash, down approximately $130 million from yearend, due primarily to the Ceridian additional capital investment, the Colt Defense investment, incremental Del Frisco's investment and common stock purchases during the quarter.
Let me now turn the call back to our operator to take your questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of John Campbell with Stephens.
If you guys can maybe just run back to what you're doing with Colt, just the opportunity there and maybe what your longer-term plans are?
Our partner ABRH is a company called Newport Group, and we originally, as you might recall, got into the restaurant business by buying the debt of the old VICORP at a discount, and then we together with Newport Group led the restructuring of that business. So we levered the debt position to get a significant equity position. We did the same thing on Remy. We used some of those same skills and techniques when on the FNF side of the world we bought Land America.
So we own in our FNF investment portfolio a piece of the Colt senior note, the bonds that they had. And through that investment, the FNFV side was able to work with Newport, who coincidently also had a piece of it, and we ended up leading that restructuring. So we have a $22 million investment split, almost 50-50 between a first lien note at $11 million roughly and then $11 million of third lien.
We think it's an attractive investment. We think there is terrific opportunity in that business to grow. It is the iconic brand, particularly in United States in that marketplace. We just think there is a lot of low-hanging fruit that we could take advantage of there going forward for a pretty modest investment.
And then on Del Frisco's, I know we've talked about that in the past. But as you guys think about longer-term plans, are you just kind of viewing that as optionality at this point? You wait and make a decision at some point or do you have any kind of imminent plan there?
We really don't have any imminent plans. The stock has moved up a bit. Their performance was okay in the first quarter. So we're kind of just viewing that, as you said, with optionality. So we have an investment. It's performed well for us. And we'll just continue to hold some investment for the time being.
Next question comes from the line of Chas Tyson with KBW.
First question is on, I saw the registration filing for the acquisition vehicle. I know that's separate from FNFV. But I was just curious if that closes off any sectors of investment for FNFV, if you try to stay out of each other's way. And also if there is going to be any breakout of the allocation of time from people working at FNFV to that vehicle?
I'll answer it first. You saw the size of that vehicle. It's going to play in the league that FNFV can never play in. They are going for multibillion dollar deals. So it's a completely different thing. And Bill is partnering with a closer associate that we've known for many years and that's unassociated with FNF and unassociated with FNFV.
So there won't be any allocation of time except for Bill's and I guess from FNFV to that.
It's really just me spending time with single purpose acquisition vehicle or corporation. So we'll go out in the search for an acquisition of a significant size. And that's going to be important to me and we're going to work hard on it. But it's not going to really distract Brent or the other guys at FNFV.
And then it looked like there was some pretty healthy margin improvement in the restaurant segment. But can you talk about -- was there any effect from Max and Erma's in that restaurant margin? And then maybe also highlight how O'Charley's performed given that there was a decline in revenue or same-store sales growth year over year?
So if you look at the each of the brands, O'Charley's store operating cash flow increased year-over-year including absorbing some one-time severance cost. So it experienced meaningful store operating cash flow increase on a year-over-year basis. As did Ninety Nine, it continues to significantly outperform; Bakers Square as well, Village Inn was a relatively flat year-over-year.
So we did a decent job managing the middle of the P&L. I think the cost of sales -- food costs came in below our anticipation. Inflation wasn't as prevalent as we were budgeting it would be. I would say is if we look at the performance of the restaurant -- and honestly, Max and Erma's didn't really have an impact on that. It was a pretty small one way or the other relative to all of ABRH.
Ninety Nine is still just performing at a alpha level. It's doing extremely well in its marketplace. We have strong leadership there. We have a reimage program that's being executed well. We're opening up a couple of new restaurants. And by the way, we are absorbing some of these labor costs in the state of New York, as an example. And we're trying to be mindful of price value and all that competitive considerations, but we are absorbing on the labor side, pretty significant increases year-over-year.
As we look at O'Charley's, we installed a new leader in that business, a new President of the division that we're very excited about to continue to drive and make further progress on the strong steps that the prior President of the company did. I would say that we're really focused there on just the nuts and bolts and making sure -- because the piece that that we are not pulling the margins from there was in the middle, just the operations, we just were not getting the pull through on the revenues. And so we're diving right into the restaurant operations to make sure that we deliver consistent product that the guest wants there.
I would say that the sales performance there started to weaken a little bit in the fourth quarter. It's gotten really competitive in the O'Charley's segment with a lot of discounting by competitors. And we have not been playing that game as aggressively as are others. So it's hurting our topline, yet we are still making the profits.
There is a lot of two-for-this, free this, free that, and we have not been aggressive in those types of promotions, but it is impacting our sales a little bit. But again, we think if you deliver good quality food that's hot at a reasonable time, delights your customers, our get satisfaction scores continue to improve, so we still think it's on the right track. But the sales as it tailed off in the fourth quarter last year and then into this year have softened relative to where it was. But part of that's designed by not using the promotional tools as aggressively as before.
So the same-store sales decline in O'Charley's I know is due to the guest count decline as opposed to anything on the pricing or mix of what people are selecting off the menu?
Our next question comes from the line of Jason Deleeuw with Piper Jaffray.
It's good to see the Ceridian revenue growing, even if it's a little bit, but looks like we've turned the corner there. I'm just trying to get a sense for when do you think the margins will inflect higher, because it sounds like the investments are still pretty high. Is there any color you can give us on potential margin inflection?
That's not going to be a 2016 story, that's going to be a 2017 story. And by the way with this new $150 investment, just to reiterate, expense has incurred. Your marketing cost, the vast majority of your implementation cost, and in this case, the sales cost. So we don't hang those on the balance sheet as you do perhaps in some other technology businesses when you win your contract.
So there is just a big demand right now for these types of services. So ourselves and competitors are aggressively going after this marketplace, which was another catalyst for the investment. Also, point out that the investment we believe is enough to get Ceridian through to the growth that we expect to get in the company through 2018 and when that margin starts expanding, which we think is more of a 2017.
But as I mentioned in my comments, the more success we seem to have in Dayforce just hits that P&L hard because of those items that I talked about. So if that's going to continue to happen throughout 2016, the next inflection point that we will talk about hopefully as we get closer to the fourth quarter and start seeing where this is happening, and maybe in Q1 of '17, would then be the turnaround and then rapid expansion of EBITDA.
But right now, we are seeing it started kind of in the fall of last year where the growth of the cloud-based business is now outpacing the decline, if you will, of the legacy core payroll business. There is still little bit of noise in the P&L from the sale of their COBRA business and the health and welfare business from last year.
We also did a transaction, a joint venture with LifeWorks, with another employee assistance benefit provider, which we think is attractive. Might have a little bit of noise, but we're really focused on the growth of Dayforce, its opportunities in the marketplace. I mean its winning. It's a terrific product. We're excited about it and excited about making that incremental investment to get into where they need to be.
And then on the share repurchases, about 26% of the equity has been repurchased thus far. You're down to about $112 million in cash. Do you think you're going to keep buying the stock and what are the plans there?
Plans currently are to continue repurchasing about 50,000 shares a day, which has been our recent history. We're trying not to run out of cash in our greed of trying to buy stock back at a discount, but certainly for the next quarter or two, we're going to keep ongoing with this 50,000 shares a day.
And we have no further questions in queue. So I'll turn it over to Mr. Foley for any closing remarks.
End of Q&A
Thank you. We completed several investment events with FNFV during the quarter and we will continue to seek strategies to most efficiently monetize our existing investments with the goal of maximizing the value of each for the benefit of FNFV shareholders. Thanks for being with us today.
Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude today's conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited.
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS.
If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: email@example.com. Thank you!