According to the Goldman Sachs' (NYSE:GS) Current Activity Indicator (CAI), economic well-being peaked in November of 2014. The erosion from 4.1% down to 1.3% over the last 18 months demonstrates just how vulnerable the U.S. economy currently is.
Not surprisingly, economic weakness has taken its toll on stock assets. The S&P 500 has not gained meaningful ground since the Fed officially stopped its bond purchases on December 18, 2014. Smaller company stocks in the Russell 2000? A bit of depreciation over the year-and-a-half period.
One may be able to make the case that U.S. equities have been resilient. After all, they've recovered most of the ground lost in the August-September correction (2015) as well as the January-February sell-off (2016). What one is unable to do is to claim that the economy itself has been able to bounce back from ongoing deterioration since the Fed began winding up its seven-year experiment with quantitative easing (QE).
Consider the weakening in the services sector over the last two years. In June of 2014, the U.S. services sector had been firing on all cylinders. Today, with the Markit US Services PMI straddling the line between expansion and contraction, one would be hard-pressed to describe the current environment as anything other than shaky.
Meanwhile, the manufacturing sector is fending off stagnation. The deterioration since the third quarter of 2014 has been fast as well as furious.
For those who have been following the retrenchment of the domestic economy as well as the global economy, the evidence does not come as a surprise. The central bank of the United States slowly tapered its emergency level bond acquisitions throughout 2014, culminating in December. In the same time frame, service providers began selling less. Manufacturers began selling less. And total business sales have been evaporating since they peaked in the third quarter of 2014.
The ramifications are three-fold. First, investors have begun to take notice of the reality that stock prices relative to sales (TTM P/S) are at their highest levels ever. On a price-to-revenue basis, in fact, stocks were cheaper during the dot-com euphoria days of 2000.
Second, investors have become more aware that corporate profits, not just corporate revenue, have been disintegrating since the Fed reined in its QE3 program in earnest. GAAP-based profits per share for the S&P 500 crested on 9/30/2014 at roughly $106. They have been dissipating ever since. Indeed, 3/30/2016 profits at $86.4 for the S&P 500 represents an 18.5% fall from grace. With the large-cap U.S. benchmark currently trading near 2075, "greater fools" need to be willing to add more stock of big name companies at an astonishing price-to-earnings multiple of 24 (TTM P/E).
Third, absent more stimulus by the Federal Reserve, selling pressure may be particularly violent for foreign equities. The Vanguard FTSE All-World (Ex U.S) ETF (NYSEARCA:VEU) highlights when the downtrend for foreign stocks originated. Just as the Fed wrapped up QE3 in the fourth quarter of 2014, the 200-day moving average for VEU began its downward slope.
Granted, foreign central banks like the European Central Bank (ECB) as well as the Bank of Japan (BOJ) have been spinning their QE wheels like crazy, the ECB's electronic money printing to acquire government debt has pushed the German 10-year bund into negative territory. The ECB's recent decision to buy corporate bonds as well as sovereign debt has sent yields on corporates tumbling as well. Not to be outdone, the BOJ has been acquiring stock ETFs as part of its quantitative easing activities. And yet, in spite of copious amounts of ECB and BOJ asset acquisitions, non-U.S. stocks are still hurting.
Janet Yellen and her Fed colleagues realize that maintaining a wealth effect stateside still requires economic stability abroad. It follows that, after initially implying (in late 2014) a series of rate hikes for 2015, Ms. Yellen pointed to global economic woes when resorting to a single rate hike in late December. After having initially implied a series of four rate hikes in 2016, the Fed now talks about a single bump higher at some point this year.
Really? Why would anyone believe what the Fed says it will do anymore?
According to Eric Balchunas at Bloomberg, investors are losing the faith. Specifically, ETF fund flows suggest that dollars are no longer flowing in and out of assets based on the Fed's potential effect on interest rates. Rather, dollars are flowing in and out of ETFs due to fears of bearish stock implications.
To wit, the largest leveraged ETF for the better part of the last six years had been ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury (NYSEARCA:TBT). Now it is the ProShares UltraShort S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA:SDS). Similar "stock-proofing" can bee seen with the SPDR Gold Trust (NYSEARCA:GLD) taking in roughly double the next competing ETF - $10 billion this year alone. And then there are the $13 billion of inflows to low-volatility ETFs, including favorites like iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility (BATS:USMV) and iShares MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (BATS:EFAV). Balchunas suggests the desire to forgo some of the upside in the hope of limiting the downside is a clear indication of stock market wariness.
There's more. The exceptional year-to-date performance for the FTSE Multi-Asset Stock Hedge Index - the "MASH" Index that I helped to create - demonstrates the high demand for "risk-off" assets. The index holds currencies like the yen, precious metals like gold, as well as longer-term sovereign debt like U.S. Treasuries.
In truth, the Federal Reserve is getting closer and closer to abandoning rate hikes entirely in 2016. From my vantage point, however, it will not be enough to bolster the economy or stock assets. The central bank of the United States may need to expand its balance sheet yet again. Members of the Open Market Committee (FOMC) may need to promise a fourth round of QE.
That's not an endorsement for emergency-level stimulus or a "QE4." On the contrary, it is a recognition of the unparalleled relationship between the Fed's balance sheet and stock price appreciation throughout the seven-plus years of stock bullishness.
Disclosure: Gary Gordon, MS, CFP is the president of Pacific Park Financial, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser with the SEC. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial, Inc, and/or its clients may hold positions in the ETFs, mutual funds, and/or any investment asset mentioned above. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate Pacific Park Financial, Inc. or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert web site. ETF Expert content is created independently of any advertising relationships.