Helmerich & Payne: A Benjamin Graham-Style Value Stock

| About: Helmerich & (HP)
This article is now exclusive for PRO subscribers.


Helmerich & Payne, Inc. has recently taken a beating to its bottom line.

Economic uncertainty is keeping the price volatile.

Buying at this time may seem like an attempt to catch a falling knife, but prudent investors will see an opportunity to purchase a stock suitable for the "defensive investor".


Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (NYSE:HP) - the U.S. based oil and gas driller - has recently taken a beating to its bottom line, and economic uncertainty is keeping the price volatile. The company's 12-month EPS have declined to only $0.95, compared to a previous 3-year average of $5.71. On the outset, buying at this time may seem like an attempt to catch a falling knife. But investors familiar with Benjamin Graham's The Intelligent Investor will see an opportunity to purchase a stock suitable for the "defensive investor."

Defensive Investor

According to Graham, a defensive investor buys from a "diversified list of leading common stocks" and ensures that the price paid "is not unduly high as judged by applicable standards." He goes on to lay out these specific standards which a stock must meet to qualify for such a list. Below, each qualification is listed and HP's financial metrics are measured against the standards:

Defensive Investor: Market Cap > $2 billion

  1. HP: $7.4 billion

Defensive Investor: Current Ratio > 2

  1. HP: 3.93

Defensive Investor: (Working Capital > Long-Term Debt)

  1. HP: Working Capital = $1.09 billion
  2. HP: Long-Term Debt = $493 million

Defensive Investor: Positive EPS Streak ≥ 10 Years

  1. HP: 10+ Years

Defensive Investor: Positive Dividends Paid Streak ≥ 10 Years

  1. HP: 10+ Years

Defensive Investor: Net Income % Growth, 5 Year CAGR ≥ 3%

  1. HP: 21.98%

Defensive Investor: Price < Intrinsic Value

Intrinsic Value = (3-Year Average Earnings * 15) + (Book Equity * 1.5) / 2

  1. HP: Intrinsic Value = $75.87/share
  2. HP: Price = $65.02/share Closing price on 7/6/16

Out of Favor

Graham states that the defensive investor strategy finds companies that contain:

"1.) A minimum of quality in the past performance and current financial position of the company, and also 2.) A minimum of quantity in terms of earnings and assets per dollar of price."

HP is trading at a significant discount when considering its past performance and current financial position. A stock can't possess both high qualities and low valuations without being strongly out-of-favor. With oil hitting historically low prices over the last 12 months and continual uncertainty in the commodities markets, it's no wonder HP's profits have suffered like they have.

While recently addressing the significant drop in earnings, the company's CFO and VP - Juan Pablo Tardio - eluded to the growing proportion of idle rigs:

"As of today, our 347 available rigs in the U.S. land segment include approximately 84 rigs generating revenue and 263 idle rigs."

Investors have good reason to be bleak about the company's near-term outlook.


The long list of stringent qualifications for the defensive investor strategy all but ensures that investors find well-managed, profitable companies. One downfall is that the approach often finds these companies as they are starting a cyclical downtrend.

This doesn't seem to be the case with HP.

With oil prices trending upward since bottoming in February 2016, there's reason to believe the company's operating results will be following suite.

An argument can be made that HP has a place in a well-diversified value portfolio. With its sufficiently padded balance sheet and low price ratios, a more than adequate margin of safety appears to be priced into the stock.

Patient value investors looking for "safety plus freedom from bother" who trust Graham's claim that a diversified group of stocks meeting the defensive investor criteria should offer satisfactory returns ought to be confident in taking a chance on HP as a long-term value opportunity.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.