10 Most Popular Private Investment Strategies For 2017

Jul. 21, 2016 1:56 PM ET2 Comments

Summary

  • We recently undertook a survey to determine the private investment strategies most likely to attract allocations over the next 12-months.
  • Here are the results and our commentary.
  • The response to our survey was overwhelming and it took me some time to collate.

10 Most Popular Private Investment Strategies for 2017

We recently undertook a survey to determine the private investment strategies most likely to attract allocations over the next 12-months.

Here are the results and our commentary.

---

The response to our survey was overwhelming and it took me some time to collate.

While I'm no statistician it is worth mentioning the methodology I employed.

The survey went out to over 100 allocators of capital including institutional investors, family offices, wealth managers and high-net worth individuals with a 45% response rate.

The responses were split approximately 20%/30%/30%/20% according to the above investor types respectively.

Most respondents provided multiple answers to the question - "Which strategy are you most likely to allocate to over the next 12 months?"

In order to compile the results below I added up all the answers and calculated the percentage by strategy.

It seems I captured most of the pertinent strategies in the options provided but 4 additional investment strategies were furnished under the 'other' option.

The Results … Drumroll

Strategy

Percent

Private Debt - Short Duration Loans

21%

Real Estate - Multi Family

20%

Natural Resources - Gold and / or Energy

14%

Distressed Debt

11%

Long Vol Quantitative OR Equity Market Neutral

9%

India

8%

Mid Mkt Buyout / Growth Equity

5%

Mezzanine Debt

4%

Real Estate Commercial / Healthcare

2%

Intellectual Property

2%

VC Tech (Early and Late Stage)

2%

TOTAL

98%

It may come as little to no surprise that we are all clamoring for yield compliments of the Federal Reserve and ultra-low interest rate environment.

In 1st place with 21% of the votes is Private Debt - Short Duration Loans;

Closely followed in 2nd place by Real Estate - Multi Family Properties with 20% of the votes.

It seems as if hardly any of us are hunting elephant returns which admittedly is more a representation of the clients we serve i.e. pools of capital focused primarily on capital preservation and a real rate of return.

Quite a distance behind, in 3rd place, with 14% of the votes is Natural resources - Gold and/or Energy. Two reasons potentially stand out for this.

1 - Gold & Silver has been on a tear lately and are exhibiting a negative correlation to equities - a hedge;

2 - Most of us are value based investors and recognize a bargain when we see one.

In fact I would postulate that most of us are quite defensively positioned in our portfolios because the next 2 favored investments strategies were:

  • Distressed Debt - 11% and;
  • Long Volatility Quantitative OR Equity Market Neutral strategies 9%

Interestingly the lower end of the voting table all contained what I would characterize as 'risk on' strategies focused mostly on capital appreciation with some income component:

  • India (and other EM) 8%;
  • Private Equity / Growth and buyout 5%;
  • Mezzanine Debt 4%;
  • Intellectual Property Rights 2%;
  • Venture Capital (early and late stage) - only 2% - this was a surprise considering how hot this space has been until recently;
  • And finally other Real Estate including office, industrial, healthcare - 2%
  • Nobody included Legalized Cannabis as an option

For the auditors amongst us that adds up to 98%. The difference I would ascribe to rounding or a margin of error in the poll rates … which we know is meaningless unless this was a Brexit vote!

Where to from here?

Firstly - we did not consider the optimal investment vehicle choices. Most respondents I am guessing are consumers of private placement limited partnership structures although more than a few would use separate accounts or require a regulated vehicle such as mutual fund or ETF.

And of course not everyone would use a fund … many respondents prefer a direct or co-investment approach. [Our preference is for a mix].

Secondly - We did not consider the characteristics we would look for in a potential investment manager in those respective strategies. Our preference for managers broadly is:

  1. Boutique Managers;
  2. Historical record of adding value (200 - 300 bps per year above some benchmark);
  3. Deep understand of and ability to communicate the Risk of the investment and business model;
  4. Considerable investment by the partners of the manager.

We think both points have merits and are worthy of further research on their own.

Thank you to all who participated I found the results interesting and informative and I hope you do too.

This article was written by

Greg Silberman is Chief Investment Officer of Atlanta Capital Group. He has over 16 years of market experience in Europe, Asia and North America, managing multibillion dollar portfolios of private equity, hedge fund, real asset and structured derivatives for institutions and individuals. A South African qualified Chartered Accountant, Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA®) and a Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst (CAIA). Greg serves on numerous endowment and foundation investment committees and is an avid Rugby and UFC fan.
Follow

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Recommended For You

Comments (2)

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.