Does Quantitative Easing Line The Pockets Of The Wealthy?

by: Colorado Wealth Management Fund


Analysts and commentators like to speculate about the impacts of quantitative easing on social groups.

Every so often a theory on quantitative easing is resurrected.

Many people believe that low interest rates were a gift to the wealthy, but that premise is wrong.

Low rates drive capital gains in bonds, but future interest income declines dramatically.

The biggest gains are to the middle class due to the ability to refinance mortgages at lower rates and save on interest costs for decades.

Lately, I've been hearing more speculation about the impacts of quantitative easing and low interest rates. Unfortunately, the speculation is rarely recognizing the long-term impacts. One theory that seems to be gaining traction is the idea that quantitative easing helps "the rich." Without defining which people will be qualified as "the rich," it is difficult to bring the discussion into the light. To have a meaningful discussion, we need to determine whether "the rich" means the top 10%, top 1%, top 0.1%, or simply people with wealth over a certain dollar amount. For simplicity sake, I'll use the term "the wealthy" to refer to the top .1%.

Income Isn't Equal to Wealth

The first issue that needs to be addressed is that income and wealth are inherently different. However, income is a key component in building wealth over time. If we look only at the top .1% for income, the major driving factor for their income is the income from investments. This comes in the form of interest, dividends, and capital gains. Once we get this far into the top of the income brackets, the people who are selected will usually be those with large amounts of wealth.

Impact of Low Rates for Wealthy People

The decline in interest rates leads to a dramatic increase in the value of bonds. That makes the wealthy portion of the population have more wealth, but it doesn't increase their income. For someone to have more income from a 30-year bond purchased before quantitative easing began, they would need to sell the bond. Their additional income would be the capital gain, but the reinvested proceeds would only be earning interest at the new market rates.

The immediate impact of quantitative easing increases the net worth of individuals with large amounts of bonds. However, it also slashes their income in future years because reinvested capital will earn substantially lower rates of return. If the low rates are successful at decreasing deflation, or creating inflation, then the real return on bonds will be even lower.

To put it simply: It drove up net worth, but drove down future income.

Impact of Low Rates for Middle Class

The Federal Reserve decided to shift from buying treasury securities to buying agency MBS. When they made that shift, it created more downward pressure on the interest rates on mortgages. While someone may be in the top .1% and have a mortgage, the outstanding loan balance is unlikely to be material relative to their wealth. On the other hand, many homeowners who owe a substantial amount of their mortgages were able to refinance into lower rates. The result of the lower rates is less interest expense, and consequently, it increases the portion of their income available for other uses.

For the Middle Class: QE drove down their costs of borrowing, and mortgage debt was often going to exceed the value of their bond portfolio. Net worth was only slightly impacted, as lower rates pushed house prices higher. Future income should barely be impacted, but future costs decreased. The net result is effectively an increase in their purchasing power.

Impact of Low Rates for Lower Class

Those without much income or wealth are much more likely to be renting. The quantitative easing did nothing to reduce the level of rent charged on apartments. From a housing perspective, this is a net loss. For those without wealth, interest income would be a foreign concept.

The impact on wealth should be immaterial.

There would be some small positive impacts from lower costs on loans, but it wouldn't reach the same levels it would for the middle class. Theoretically, lower rates on MBS would mean cheaper financing of apartment buildings, and under most economic theories, the decline in the cost of providing housing would send rent levels lower. That did not happen.

Rent levels increased and the share prices of REITs soared as the savings on the cost of debt turned into stronger dividends. There is no proof that higher rates would have prevented the increase in rental rates, so the only clear impact is a lower interest rate on loans.


The impact of lower rates is most substantial for the middle class due to the benefits of being able to refinance houses at lower rates. The embedded option in the mortgage (the right to prepay) is the most valuable feature in a period of suddenly declining interest rates. For the wealthy to retain the level of interest income they achieved previously, they would need interest rates to go back to prior levels. That would erase the gains to net worth from low rates. On the other hand, if rates moved back to higher levels, the middle class would still have the benefit of cheaper mortgage financing.

Want to Learn More About Investing for Income?

The Mortgage REIT Forum is a new exclusive research platform. The first 100 subscribers will be able to lock in their subscription rates at only $240/year. My investment ideas emphasize finding undervalued mortgage REITs, triple net lease REITs, and preferred shares. With the market at relatively high levels, there is also significant work on finding which securities are overvalued to protect investors from losing a chunk of their portfolio.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: Information in this article represents the opinion of the analyst. All statements are represented as opinions, rather than facts, and should not be construed as advice to buy or sell a security. This article is prepared solely for publication on Seeking Alpha and any reproduction of it on other sites is unauthorized. Ratings of “outperform” and “underperform” reflect the analyst’s estimation of a divergence between the market value for a security and the price that would be appropriate given the potential for risks and returns relative to other securities. The analyst does not know your particular objectives for returns or constraints upon investing. All investors are encouraged to do their own research before making any investment decision. Information is regularly obtained from Yahoo Finance, Google Finance, and SEC Database. If Yahoo, Google, or the SEC database contained faulty or old information it could be incorporated into my analysis. Tipranks: Assign no ratings.