Price Range Seen By Big$ Funds As Likely In Next 3 Months For Amazon

| About:, Inc. (AMZN)
This article is now exclusive for PRO subscribers.


Forecasts are derived from the volume Market-Making Community's reactions to "order flow" from investment organization clients running multiple-$billion funds (the money muscle to move markets).

See pictured trends of daily updated attitudes, as they were expressed in prior days, now subsequently seen as the current-day expectations.

NOT a "technical analysis" of past prices. Instead, an analysis of forward-looking protective behavior actions.

Comparisons of today's expectations for the subject with similar prior upside-to-downside prospect forecasts made in the past five years tell what subsequently happened to its price.

No guarantees, but explicitly stated are odds of profitability now, and extent of interim price drawdowns and ultimate payoff opportunity, based on actual market history.

The past six months daily forecast trend

Hedging by market professionals to protect at-risk commitments of their firm's capital - necessary for buyer-seller volume transaction balancing - provides a sophisticated indirect way to see just how far up and down market prices of stocks and ETFs are believed likely to travel.

Analysis of specific security market actions subsequent to those revelations provides a qualitative sense of how well prior forecasts like those of today led to profitable positions. Figure 1 pictures the ranges and trend of price expectations - recent prior to current - and holds a mini-table of related data analysis.

Figure 1

(used with permission)

The vertical lines here span the range of price being hedged against by the market-making (MM) community. They protect their firm capital temporarily put at-risk to "fill" the "other side" of volume block trades in the subject security on each date indicated. Derivative securities used to provide the hedging protection must contemplate the likely extent of the subject's coming prices.

The heavy dot is the subject's end-of-day market quote that day. It defines the upside and downside price change prospects held likely. The balance of those proportions is measured by the Range Index (RI). It tells what percentage of the entire forecast span is below the current market quote. Here it is 36, indicating 2 times as much upside as downside.

The row of data between the two pictures uses the RI's history to evaluate how effective today's RI has been in the three months following each similar RI of the past five years.

Definition of the data items is as follows:

Range Index: Percentage of High Forecast minus Low Forecast range lying below Current Price

Sample Size: The number of prior day forecasts at RIs like today's, out of past five years' days of forecasts

Sell Target Potential: Percent the High Range Forecast is above the Current Price

Drawdown Exposure: Average of each Sample's worst-case next three-month experiences

Win Odds: Percentage of Sample with profit at three months or on first Sell Target closeout

% Payoff: Average size of all Sample closeout prices from their Current Price cost*

Days Held: Market-day count from forecast day to closeout day

Annual Return: CAGR of % Payoff in number of Days Held of market-days year (252)

Cred.Ratio: Forecast credibility, measured by % Sell Target divided by % Payoff

*Position costs are at closing prices of next market day after forecast.

The lower "thumbnail" picture in Figure 1 shows the distribution of RIs over the past five years of daily forecasts. RIs other than today's are likely to produce different data.

The population of forecasts this issue is drawn from

The current MM population forecast averages and the average of its best 20 are in Figure 2.

Figure 2


Some additional weekly interval forecasts

For historical perspective, Figure 3 provides once-a-week extracts of the current subject's daily prior forecasts to form a two-year weekly history of forecasts.

Figure 3

(used with permission)


Some points in time offer little help on many stocks and ETFs for investors concerned with building capital wealth by equity investment.

That is not the case here, now, for, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN). Its upside prospect is quite large in comparison to its drawdown history, with a full 2 to 1 reward to risk ratio. Its Range Index of 28 is on the dangerous high side of the RI distribution. Its Win Odds of 81 is competitive in comparison to many alternatives, particularly among the best 20 of the 2,500+ forecast population in Figure 2.

The credibility of its historical payoffs from the current RI level in comparison to the upside sell target is also good enough to support a desirable +57% CAGR. AMZN's well-maintained trend of price range expectations is a strength for the longer term.

The distribution of AMZN's Range Indexes might normally be a caution, but the stock's impressive Win Odds, strong reward to risk ratio, and good credible ratio suggest that it may be a timely buy here.

Additional disclosure: Peter Way and generations of the Way Family are long-term providers of perspective information, earlier helping professional investors and now individual investors, discriminate between wealth-building opportunities in individual stocks and ETFs. We do not manage money for others outside of the family but do provide pro bono consulting for a limited number of not-for-profit organizations.

We firmly believe investors need to maintain skin in their game by actively initiating commitment choices of capital and time investments in their personal portfolios. So our information presents for D-I-Y investor guidance what the arguably best-informed professional investors are thinking. Their insights, revealed through their own self-protective hedging actions, tell what they believe is most likely to happen to the prices of specific issues in coming weeks and months. Evidences of how such prior forecasts have worked out are routinely provided. Our website, has further information.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.