Best And Worst Q1'17: Consumer Discretionary ETFs And Mutual Funds

|
Includes: FCECX, FDLSX, IYC, PBS
by: David Trainer

Summary

The Consumer Discretionary sector ranks fifth in Q1'17.

Based on an aggregation of ratings of 13 ETFs and 19 mutual funds.

IYC is the top-rated Consumer Discretionary ETF and FDLSX is the top-rated Consumer Discretionary mutual fund.

The Consumer Discretionary sector ranks fifth out of the ten sectors as detailed in our Q1'17 Sector Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. Last quarter, the Consumer Discretionary sector ranked second. It gets our Neutral rating, which is based on an aggregation of ratings of 13 ETFs and 19 mutual funds in the Consumer Discretionary sector. See a recap of our Q4'16 Sector Ratings here.

Figure 1 ranks from best to worst the eight Consumer Discretionary ETFs that meet our liquidity standards and Figure 2 shows the five best and worst-rated Consumer Discretionary mutual funds. Not all Consumer Discretionary sector ETFs and mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings varies widely (from 25 to 386). This variation creates drastically different investment implications and, therefore, ratings.

Investors seeking exposure to the Consumer Discretionary sector should buy one of the Attractive-or-better rated ETFs or mutual funds from Figures 1 and 2.

Here is our ETF and mutual fund rating methodology, which leverages our rigorous analysis of each fund's holdings. We think advisors and investors focused on prudent investment decisions should include analysis of fund holdings in their research process for ETFs and mutual funds.

Figure 1: ETFs with the Best & Worst Ratings - Top 5 * Best ETFs exclude ETFs with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity.

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Five ETFs are excluded from Figure 1 because their total net assets (TNA) are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums.

Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best & Worst Ratings - Top 5

* Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity.

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Six mutual funds are excluded from Figure 2 because their total net assets are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums.

The iShares U.S. Consumer Services ETF (NYSEARCA:IYC) is the top-rated Consumer Discretionary ETF and the Fidelity Leisure Portfolio (MUTF:FDLSX) is the top-rated Consumer Discretionary mutual fund. Both earn an Attractive rating.

The PowerShares Dynamic Media Portfolio (NYSEARCA:PBS) is the worst rated Consumer Discretionary ETF and the Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discretionary Fund (MUTF:FCECX) is the worst rated Consumer Discretionary mutual fund. Both earn a Dangerous rating.

435 stocks of the 3000+ we cover are classified as Consumer Discretionary stocks.

The Danger Within

Buying a fund without analyzing its holdings is like buying a stock without analyzing its business and finances. Put another way, research on fund holdings is necessary due diligence because a fund's performance is only as good as its holdings' performance. Don't just take our word for it, see what Barron's says on this matter.

PERFORMANCE OF FUND's HOLDINGs = PERFORMANCE OF FUND

Figures 3 and 4 show the rating landscape of all Consumer Discretionary ETFs and mutual funds.

Figure 3: Separating the Best ETFs From the Worst ETFs

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Figure 4: Separating the Best Mutual Funds From the Worst Mutual Funds

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

This article originally published here on January 18, 2017.

Disclosure: David Trainer, Kyle Guske and Kyle Martone receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, sector or theme.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

About this article:

Expand
Want to share your opinion on this article? Add a comment.
Disagree with this article? .
To report a factual error in this article, click here