How To Find The Best Sector Mutual Funds: Q1'17

|
Includes: FDCPX, FSNGX, LOGSX, VFAIX
by: David Trainer

Summary

The large number of mutual funds hurts investors more than it helps as too many options become paralyzing.

Performance of a mutual fund's holdings are equal to the performance of a mutual fund.

Our coverage of mutual funds leverages the diligence we do on each stock by rating mutual funds based on the aggregated ratings of their holdings.

Finding the best mutual funds is an increasingly difficult task in a world with so many to choose from. How can you pick with so many choices available?

Don't Trust Mutual Fund Labels

There are at least 213 different Financials mutual funds and at least 637 mutual funds across ten sectors. Do investors need 63+ choices on average per sector? How different can the mutual funds be?

Those 213 Financials mutual funds are very different. With anywhere from 26 to 401 holdings, many of these Financials mutual funds have drastically different portfolios, creating drastically different investment implications.

The same is true for the mutual funds in any other sector, as each offers a very different mix of good and bad stocks. Consumer Staples rank first for stock selection. Energy ranks last. Details on the Best & Worst mutual funds in each sector are here.

Paralysis By Analysis

We think the large number of Financials (or any other) sector mutual funds hurts investors more than it helps because too many options can be paralyzing. It is simply not possible for the majority of investors to properly assess the quality of so many mutual funds. Analyzing mutual funds, done with the proper diligence, is far more difficult than analyzing stocks because it means analyzing all the stocks within each mutual fund. As stated above, that can be as many as 401 stocks, and sometimes even more, for one mutual fund.

Any investor focused on fulfilling fiduciary duties recognizes that analyzing the holdings of a mutual fund is critical to finding the best mutual fund. Figure 1 shows our top rated mutual fund for each sector.

Figure 1: The Best Mutual Fund in Each Sector

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Amongst the mutual funds in Figure 1, the Fidelity Computers Portfolio (MUTF:FDCPX) ranks first overall, the Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (MUTF:LOGSX) ranks second, and the Vanguard Financials Index Fund (MUTF:VFAIX) ranks third. The Fidelity Select Natural Gas Portfolio (MUTF:FSNGX) ranks last.

How to Avoid "The Danger Within"

Why do you need to know the holdings of mutual funds before you buy?

You need to be sure you do not buy a fund that might blow up. Buying a fund without analyzing its holdings is like buying a stock without analyzing its business and finances. No matter how cheap, if it holds bad stocks, the mutual fund's performance will be bad. Don't just take our word for it, see what Barron's says on this matter.

PERFORMANCE OF FUND'S HOLDINGS = PERFORMANCE OF FUND

If Only Investors Could Find Funds Rated by Their Holdings…

Our mutual fund ratings leverage our stock coverage. We rate mutual funds based on the aggregated ratings of the stocks each mutual fund holds.

Fidelity Computers Portfolio is not only the top-rated Information Technology mutual fund, but is also the overall best sector mutual fund out of the 637 sector mutual funds that we cover.

The worst mutual fund in Figure 1 is Fidelity Select Natural Gas Portfolio which gets a Dangerous rating. One would think mutual fund providers could do better for this sector.

This article was originally published on February 9, 2017.

Disclosure: David Trainer, Kyle Guske II, and Kyle Martone receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, sector, or theme.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

About this article:

Expand
Problem with this article? Please tell us. Disagree with this article? .