Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

Tesla (TSLA) Q1 2017 Results - Earnings Call Transcript

May 04, 2017 1:17 AM ETTesla, Inc. (TSLA)86 Comments
SA Transcripts profile picture
SA Transcripts
142.56K Followers

Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) Q1 2017 Earnings Call May 3, 2017 5:30 PM ET

Executives

Jeffrey K. Evanson - Tesla Motors, Inc.

Elon Reeve Musk - Tesla Motors, Inc.

Deepak Ahuja - Tesla Motors, Inc.

Jonathan McNeill - Tesla Motors, Inc.

Jeffrey B. Straubel - Tesla Motors, Inc.

Analysts

Alexander Eugene Potter - Piper Jaffray & Co.

Antonio M. Sacconaghi - Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. LLC

Colin Langan - UBS Securities LLC

Adam Michael Jonas - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC

Tyler Charles Frank - Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc. (Private Wealth Management)

David Tamberrino - Goldman Sachs & Co.

Martin Viecha - Redburn (Europe) Ltd.

Brian A. Johnson - Barclays Capital, Inc.

Rod Lache - Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.

Colin Rusch - Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.

Ryan Brinkman - JPMorgan Securities LLC

John Murphy - Bank of America-Merrill Lynch

James J. Albertine - Consumer Edge Research LLC

Brad D. Erickson - Pacific Crest Securities

Jeffrey Osborne - Cowen & Co. LLC

Joseph Spak - RBC Capital Markets LLC

Robert Cihra - Guggenheim Securities LLC

Charlie Lowell Anderson - Dougherty & Co. LLC

Operator

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Tesla First Quarter 2017 Financial Results Q&A Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time.

As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to your host, Mr. Jeff Evanson. Mr. Evanson, you may begin.

Jeffrey K. Evanson - Tesla Motors, Inc.

Thank you, Sheria. And good afternoon, everyone. I'm joined today by Elon Musk, JB Straubel, Deepak Ahuja, Jon McNeill, and Lyndon Rive. Today on our webcast, we'll discuss our Q1 results that are announced in the update letter at the same link as this webcast. And during our call we

Recommended For You

Comments (86)

Guestsvenne profile picture
I will buy 500 more shares tomorrow. I first bought around $27/share, then $153/share and I still see this as an incredible opportunity to invest (yes, many people would not call it that, but then going short is not an investment...) in something that I'm sure will become giant and very profitable in years to come. I will not need to sell for many years and will have no problem with short-term dips, dilution, etc. I may not be sophisticated as an investor, but I'm doing quite well in identifying diamonds in the rough and investing heavily.
portatopia profile picture
"I will buy 500 more shares tomorrow."

Thank you Guestsvenne.
Guestsvenne profile picture
You are most welcome. Wish I could buy much more. I'm buying at 10 x my first investment, but feel more confident this time that I will see great appreciation. My father just called me an idiot, but then again my overall investment gains far outstrip his.
solucky profile picture
" . My father just called me an idiot, but then again my overall investment gains far outstrip his."

Hope you sell early enough, you might buy at any dip in the future untill you are broke .
j
Orphancarguy

Tesla doesn't make the rockets....that's SpaceX. Different company, different technology. TSLA battery tech is widely available to any carmaker, and TSLA has no IP to protect any advantage. Glass roofs are heavier and more expensive than steel. So far, TSLA automation seems to be conventional Kuka general purpose industrial robots, i.e. what everyone from GM to Whirlpool uses in their lines. Is your optimism based on evidence, or faith?
O
Two small comments underlined for me why the short position, while extremely sensible and reasonable on the surface by all conventional metrics, is just wrong.

Has to do with the Model 3 .... and the Model Y. 3,000 m of wiring for S/X to 1500 m in 3 .... and only 100 m (!!!) in the Y. Second, the elimination of an iffy spot, the 12v battery, and all that that entails. Unlike most vehicles, the provision of constant (relatively to other cars) high power throughput via the 12v outstripped the durability of even gelpack 12v. So, getting rid of the 12v...and all the structures translating 350 v or 400 v whatever to a parallel system 12 v, is a stunning cutting of complexity. Both together are like going from carbon filament hand blown glass light bulbs running off a dynamo to LEDs running off 'wasted' sunlight and a miniscule battery.

I also understand the previous reveal of the very large glass roof and what it means to the speed and ease of construction in an automated factory, besides the obvious benefit of lighter and stronger body shells.

Like the re-used, not only theoretically reusable, self-landing rocket stage for a small fraction of the cost of "traditional OEM rocket manufacturers" Tesla keeps surprising as a source of multiple Black Swans. I get why Tesla is anathema to any traditionalists out there. I also get why Tesla, or something quite similar to Tesla Inc will be successful, even though I too am a traditionalist.
MacAfrican profile picture
Orphan:

Reality check, by rough estimate their is more than 100m in wiring for just the multiple cables required for window winders, door locks, hood releases, boot releases, window adjusters, electric seat adjusters, window wipers. We have not started on displays, entertainment, lights, steering, handbrake or the battery pack or drivetrain.

Musk be the first principles : wireless control and power everywhere. Madness defined!
V
Wireless control may well be part of the solution.
MacAfrican profile picture
Vikram:
and wireless power too I suppose??

If you are running power to say 4 motors and a heater in a seat you can do powerline communications but it would be stupid to do so in a car.

Elsewhere I invited bets : I will pay $2 per actual meter less than 100m to the opposite party (whom is obviously going short cable). He pays me only 20c per meter for every meter over 100m since I am going long cable. How many contracts are you interested in at $100m per contract?

Musk talks outright nonsense neither first or second, but rather unprincipled
dcxavier profile picture
So many outrageous comments from Tesla.

-- "The increase in inventory is about split in two. One is we increased Model X test drive vehicles by about a thousand over the past quarter... The second half is in our service loaners." - So the increasing thousands of unsold cars are simply demos and loaners. Got it.

-- "We have seen some impact of Model S orders as a function of people being confused that Model 3 is the upgrade to Model S. And we took action to correct that about a month ago, but that message has not filtered down to all of our customers." - All the rich progressive one-percenters who shelled out for the Model S are too stupid to realize that the Model 3 is an entry car. I'm not sure if this is a damnation of Elon, progressives, or both.

-- "Yeah, so with Model 3, I think we'll be roughly comparable with the best high-volume vehicle production lines in the world." - You'd expect that since it is the newest assembly line in the world. But it's nothing special.

-- Elon Musk was asked repeatedly about 2018 order rates for the Models S/X by David Tamberrino of Goldman. In particular, Mr. Tamberrino wanted to know if Tesla was expecting 100,000 orders in 2017. After extensive dodging, Elon's final response was "I don't think it's meaningful. Like we're going to produce 100,000 units approximately. So, all that matters is there going to be demand for 100,000 units? I believe there will be, or there is." - Not meaningful??? In other words, four months into 2017, Elon isn't sure? That means NO, orders are under 100,000, perhaps substantially under.

-- When asked about the platform for the Model Y, Elon responded "It will be, yeah. Different platform. I'll tell you..." - Yikes!, A whole new platform for the next vehicle. No reuse, this is going to be enormously expensive and prone to problems. Big News!

-- When asked about that $100M writeoff for SolarCity, the response was "the $100 million is the change quarter-over-quarter that you're referring to, and in Q4 – and this is arcane purchase accounting." - Arcane only. Nothing to see here.
H
dcxavier: "So the increasing thousands of unsold cars are simply demos and loaners. Got it."

This is what I've been repeating, but nobody seemed to listen. More loaners (number of service centers times 5 loaners? 10?, demos (number of stores times 10 demos? 20?), and inventory cars to sell (number of stores times 100? 200?). You get to the thousands easily. Evidently Tesla keeps selling them though. Good for some consumers to get a discounted Tesla that's been lightly used and good for Tesla to keep moving product.

"a damnation of Elon, progressives, or both."

Great question. I think both. It's been repeated that the first generation car was the roadster, second generation car was the Model S/X, and third generation is the Model 3. This implies "generation" is advances in technology and/or features. Tesla is now trying to clarify the differences. The Model 3 is the third model aimed at the mid-level consumer instead of the high-level consumer, meaning fewer features, performance and technology.

"orders are under 100,000, perhaps substantially under."

That's highly likely. As Tesla moves from a full "order your car" system to a "either order your car or buy off the lot now" system, you'll see a lot more inventory cars. They can still move that 100,000, too. But I expect a dropoff in Model S/X after the Model 3 is released. Some of those stretching for the top level car with no options will choose a lower priced car with extra features.

"a whole new platform for the next vehicle"

Yep, that surprised me too. But having learned from the S/X, perhaps just planning for a new platform now will ease its production schedule. But I thought having the same platform as the Model 3 would simplify things.
GoTeslaGo!! profile picture
"-- "We have seen some impact of Model S orders as a function of people being confused that Model 3 is the upgrade to Model S. And we took action to correct that about a month ago, but that message has not filtered down to all of our customers." - All the rich progressive one-percenters who shelled out for the Model S are too stupid to realize that the Model 3 is an entry car. I'm not sure if this is a damnation of Elon, progressives, or both. "

Give the man a break, he has to try has best to pump. After all it was easy to pump his congregation, can't blame him for thinking the 1 percent also has the same intelligence as his congregation.
P
Oh, and by the way, the 100,000 cars a year without growth still does not produce any net cash flow from operating activities. There is no profit. Not after paying for the rest of the non COGS expenses.
Gross margin goes up, but expenses go up even faster.
The only time Tesla ever shows a glimmer of a profit, it is when they lump 4 Qs of ZEV credits into 1, and move as many favorable accounting anomalies into that same quarter, along with giga-discounts to "move the iron".
m
http://bit.ly/2qC5JP2

He's not walking it back as in 'it won't happen'.
He may be, as in we're working systematically toward it, more so than the best other manufacturers with the next round of improvements after the introduction of the Model 3, and fully realizing it with the Model Y [which is a few years out].
In other words, he is saying it won't be instant, but it will happen, and it's on a schedule.
V
It would be quite interesting to point out, how much of the rich valuation evaporated yesterday and how much is going to disappear today. :-)
V
I know, it is a mathematics, so I will do it for you :-).

At the moment, TSLA has 163.5 mill shares (source: SA), taking into consideration, that TSLA lost $8 yesterday and $5 during the premarket session (13 in total) we talk about $2.1 billion just in about a day and half. Well, still less than 3.7 indeed. But, the day is not over yet, is it?
B
"It would be quite interesting to point out, how much of the rich valuation evaporated yesterday and how much is going to disappear today. :-)"

Indeed, yesterday it plummeted to depths not seen in almost a week, that's YUUGGE.
GoTeslaGo!! profile picture
" So I really do not see any segment of transport that will not be electric, in fact I'm highly confident that all transport will go fully electric with the ironic exception of rockets. Yeah, just kidding."

Great double talking!!! The good old Messiah Musk at his best. Saying one thing but covering his butt with another counter statement.
GoTeslaGo!!
P
Well has not God spoken? Elon :"Well, I think, we feel pretty good about achieving the sort of the 100K – roughly 100K total for the year for Model S and Model X, combined. That's where we kind of want to be. The manufacturing system and the supply chain is all sort of set up for that level.
In plain English, sales are expected to be flat.
No more "S curved exponential" whatnot for the S and X in 2017.
Hell of a growth story: 0%.
And since 94%+ of the sales are actually autos, and low margin ones if you include all the SG&A, R&D, Stock Comp, and the rest as part of COGS -- how does the tech angle play out here?
All the FANGs have way higher margins on incremental sales.
And the Solar activities, hey there's no positive margin at all.
Logical Thought profile picture
Besides the usual disastrous financials, you guys are missing the KEY disaster from the call:

"Yeah, so with Model 3, I think we'll be roughly comparable with the best high-volume vehicle production lines in the world. Better in some respects, a little worse in others. But roughly comparable, and then with some further iteration, I think it will probably be a little bit better than the next-best automotive production line. Then where things will really be a step change, I think, beyond any other auto manufacturer, will be the Model Y factory."

HE'S ALREADY WALKING BACK "THE MACHINE THAT MAKES THE MACHINE"!
M
You have to figure he will always do that as long as the company keeps going. Never mind this turning point Model 3 that may or may not be the turning point look over there at the Model Y and the Semi truck. So far it's just " burn baby burn" as that's what cash is doing. Not sure when and if this process turns.
Davewmart profile picture
Did anyone understand what to me was utter goobledegook

'Jeffrey B. Straubel - Tesla Motors, Inc.

Let me just add as a relevant benchmark against the Model S and the Model X, Model 3 is vastly more automated. And perhaps it's not the best benchmark to use looking forward, but it's perhaps three to four times more automated than a Model S or a Model X. And much, much simpler to build.

Elon Reeve Musk - Tesla Motors, Inc.

Is that one-fifth of the hours per car?

Jeffrey B. Straubel - Tesla Motors, Inc.

Yep.

Elon Reeve Musk - Tesla Motors, Inc.

So it's five times the volume, but the same hours per car.

Colin Langan - UBS Securities LLC

Got it.

Elon Reeve Musk - Tesla Motors, Inc.

Compared to S.'

Presumably that is supposed to mean 1/5th the hours per car, although it says the opposite.
ValueAnalyst profile picture
No he isn't. He has always said Gigafactory 1 will be "Alien Dreadnaught 0.5" and will ramp up to Alien Dreadnaught 1.0 throughout 2018.

His comments on the call are perfectly in line with previous comments.

Moreover, his comments around competitors not being able to "copy" the software that controls the machines that make the machines is extremely important and clearly will be yet another source of durable competitive advantage.
Kiwi_Guy profile picture
Very impressive transcript, many thanks. A lot of very interesting stuff going on, and the comments on the Semi "using a bunch of Model 3 motors" were very intriguing. Bring on the reveal in September!
V
IMHO, these comments were quite useless talk. TSLA needs to ramp M3, and their "nearly done" likely means that nothing is in place yet. Then they want to do their Y model. Sometimes between they must prepare next generation of S. Make it short, in next 5 years, nothing will happen with this concept, leave alone the fact, that they got no money to do it and may go bust.
b
Maybe I'm a grouchy credit investor, but they swerved the capex guidance twice no?
How do they not know what the spend will be for model 3?
CB-Fighter profile picture
My take:

1. There was no answer to Goldman Sachs question about 'order rate growth for the quarter' which is meaningful in terms of assessing demand. No answer is an answer.

2. The 'antiselling' of M3 raises questions: who wants a car that is built so cheaply and in a rush? Is there anybody out there who truly believes that high quality comes at no price?

3. The next narrative already started to make people believe that there will be a chance for profitability even if M3 fails: Model Y sometime in 2020 or aspirationally late 2019.

Sad.
GoTeslaGo!! profile picture
" My take:

1. There was no answer to Goldman Sachs question about 'order rate growth for the quarter' which is meaningful in terms of assessing demand. No answer is an answer."

We all know no answer meaning no answer that he can produce that will make tesla look good. As he confirmed the yearly delivery total for S and X should be 100k achievable. Ie...no increase from Q1, and that rate is highly uncertain.

"2. The 'antiselling' of M3 raises questions: who wants a car that is built so cheaply and in a rush? Is there anybody out there who truly believes that high quality comes at no price?"

Lots of people. When you are in a church, you don't ask questions. You just believe and buy/donate.

"3. The next narrative already started to make people believe that there will be a chance for profitability even if M3 fails: Model Y sometime in 2020 or aspirationally late 2019."

Messiah Elon is simply doing a great job to allow dreamers to continue the valuation model they been using: addressable market. Short of that, everything would collapse.

"Sad. "

It is sad that many believes without question.
Alexandria85 profile picture
Steve Jobs was a dreamer too !
Davewmart profile picture
I picked up the following from a quick browse, which is not a precis, just highlighting the claims I was interested in:

1. The excess of production over deliveries is due to a large number of loaners and demonstration vehicles being supplied - very high for such a small producer in my view.

2. The say that deliveries are to end users, not middlemen as some of us thought might be the case.

3. The spend to ramp up for the M3 is supposed to be happening now and in Q3, with stretched terms to suppliers and 90 day credits accounting to the low amount shown to the end Q1.

4. The semi is going to have a multi motor design, using M3 motors.
That suggested to me motors on each axle.

5. They explained the large gap between their prices for the batteries in the Powerwall II and their claimed decreases in cell costs and so on by saying that there is a lot more to the battery than just the cell.

And there isn't in car batteries?
V
It came to my attention, that their financial guru may have come with another trick how to hide falling M3 reservations. Did I get it right, that they record those "loaners" into the same account as their deposits? Not entire value, but maybe they charge some "deposit" on loaners too. Considering, that their repair centers are all the time full of people, that should generate nice cash at least to hide the real state of the deposit account.
M
The number of loaners is not excessive because Tesla lemons spend lots of time at service centers.
GoTeslaGo!! profile picture
Some of the things you missed in your quick browse are:

1. Messiah said 100k for M and S this yearly likely (ie, no growth from Q1 for combined S and X production or delivery. Given the fact that they said they are increasing their loaners with the production gap, this increase should not be needed further in future quarters, but apparently it still is, otherwise the yearly total delivery should be more than 4x Q1.

2. The supply is pegged to be constrained as Messiah said their production line was using overtime last year and not anymore. It seem to imply they can produce more now, actually would mean much more if they use overtime, but they didn't. Likely due to demand constrain. Messiah just backdooredly admitted Tesla is demand constrained. And actually this is evidenced in the yearly forecast as well as recent Model S price drop.

3. Messiah said communication between production machines are much more complicated than between cars! So much so that it won't be duplicated and he would not know what to do with if he were the ceo of other manufacturer.
Stationary machines has more complicated communication for cooperations than unpredictable moving objects on the road? Very interesting. It would be helpful if someone enlighten me on this one.
runarbt profile picture
Great transcript and great call. Future look very bright and interesting.:-) go tesla!
Shrinidhi Ghatpande profile picture
Did they ask why Tesla changed the number of of deliveries to end customer to just customer?
V
Yes. Tesla clarified that it is end customer.
Shrinidhi Ghatpande profile picture
Thanks.
Andreas Hopf profile picture
Then, the mystery 7,373 cars must have gone to China as such quantity was not registered in Hong Kong, the U.S. or Europe.
To report an error in this transcript, .Contact us to add your company to our coverage or use transcripts in your business. Learn more about Seeking Alpha transcripts here. Your feedback matters to us!

About TSLA

SymbolLast Price% Chg
Market Cap
PE
Yield (TTM)
Rev Growth (YoY)
Short Interest
Prev. Close
Compare to Peers

More on TSLA

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.