Disruption In The Tech Sector

|
Includes: FTEC, IYW, ROM, TECL, VGT, XLK
by: Janus Henderson Investors

By Brad Slingerlend and Denny Fish

The technology sector is in the midst of a generational platform shift as customers transition toward mobile and cloud computing. The disruption caused by this transition has far-reaching consequences for both tech companies and investors seeking to gain exposure to the sector. As managers of our technology strategy, we believe we are in the middle innings of this shift, and that's when the secular headwinds are most dangerous. Based on previous platform shifts, many established companies - the ones that rode the wave of personal computers and software - are likely to get left behind. In fact, we categorize about one-quarter of the MSCI All Country World Information Technology (ACWI IT) Index as legacy companies, with the majority of these structurally challenged.

Yet, these are the companies that many technology investors unknowingly have disproportionate exposure to when accessing the sector through passive strategies. Benchmarks, by their nature, are weighted toward yesterday's winners. By tethering their portfolio weights to a backward-looking benchmark, passive investors are essentially placing a bet that the successful tech companies of the past will also be successful in the future.

The likelihood of so-called legacy companies effectively transforming their businesses to meet the demands of tomorrow's marketplace is remote, especially given the intensity of the current disruption. Rather than assume the existing landscape remains intact, investors must deduce what the dominant ecosystems will be in three to five years. This requires deep fundamental research, with the goal of identifying which disruptors will become the large caps of tomorrow.

Using history as our guide, we believe that few companies tend to successfully navigate these platform shifts. Identifying those that have the greatest chance of reinventing themselves and those most likely to get left behind is where active management can provide a competitive advantage over passive strategies. An active manager can take advantage of this disruption by using methods unavailable in passive vehicles. The most important thing we can do is choose not to invest in challenged companies. We can also overweight fast-growing disruptors, which could become acquisition targets for struggling incumbents looking to remain relevant.

Disclosure: Please consider the charges, risks, expenses and investment objectives carefully before investing. Please see a prospectus or, if available, a summary prospectus containing this and other information. Read it carefully before you invest or send money.

The views presented are as of the date published. They are for information purposes only and should not be used or construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any security or market sector. No forecasts can be guaranteed. The opinions and examples are meant as an illustration of broader themes, are not an indication of trading intent, and are subject to change at any time due to changes in market or economic conditions. There is no guarantee that the information supplied is accurate, complete, or timely, nor are there any warranties with regards to the results obtained from its use. It is not intended to indicate or imply in any manner that any illustration/example mentioned is now or was ever held in any Janus portfolio, or that current or past results are indicative of future profitability or expectations. As with all investments, there are inherent risks to be considered.

ETFs distributed by ALPS Distributors, Inc. ALPS is not affiliated with Janus.

Mutual funds distributed by Janus Distributors LLC

Janus International Holding LLC © 2001-2016. All rights reserved.

First published on Bloomberg View on 05/29/2017

Reprinted with permission. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of others in Janus' organization.