One Thing You Should Know About Ladder Capital
Summary
- There has always been a debate over which management structure is most favorable, and the controversy seems to always center on conflicts of interest.
- Having strong shareholder alignment is an important element to the investing process, and as far as I’m concerned, it’s one of the most misunderstood.
- I consider the strong insider ownership and internal management to be a critical part of my decision-making process and one good reason that I am maintaining a Buy on LADR.
Far too many executives have become more concerned with the 'four P's' - pay, perks, power and prestige - rather than making profits for shareholders. - T. Boone Pickens
A few days ago, I wrote an article titled Management Matters. The purpose for the article was to highlight a few externally-managed REITs to avoid. I explained that “fundamental analysis is a key component of understanding the outlook for a REIT’s future profitability and competitive forces.”
In a REIT with an internal management structure, its own officers and employees manage the portfolio of assets, and I explained that “a REIT with an external management structure usually resembles a private equity arrangement, in which the external manager receives a flat fee and an incentive fee for managing the REIT's portfolio of assets.”
There has always been a debate over which management structure is most favorable, and the controversy seems to always center on conflicts of interest. I went on to say that,
when you buy shares in an externally managed REIT, you are not actually hiring the management team. The Board has negotiated a contract with an outside management team to run the business, and typically, their compensation is tied directly to growing assets under management, much like the private equity model
Today, I am highlighting one key differentiator of Ladder Capital (NYSE:LADR), a commercial mortgage REIT that is internally-managed. Unlike other commercial mortgage REIT peers, LADR is the ONLY internally-managed commercial mREITs with strong shareholder alignment: management and directors own $189 million of equity in the company.
Having strong shareholder alignment is an important element to the investing process, and as far as I’m concerned, it’s one of the most misunderstood. For that reason, I decided to highlight one of my favorite mortgage REITs and one that deserves a premium for creating strong alignment with shareholders (of which I am one).
Ladder Capital: A Uniquely-Positioned REIT
Ladder Capital is a diversified commercial real estate company that was formed in 2008 and went public in 2014 (as a C-Corp). The company's primary business strategy is to originate and securitize first mortgage loans on stabilized, income-producing commercial real estate properties. LADR is one of the largest non-bank contributors of loans to CMBS securitizations in the U.S.
However, LADR has a unique model in which the company does not rely exclusively on securitization for its revenue and has other diversified sources of revenue, including earning a significant portion of its revenue from first mortgage balance sheet loans and property rentals as well as expanding its market share in the commercial mortgage loan origination market.
In 2014, LADR commenced the necessary steps to convert from a C-Corp into a REIT structure, and during the first quarter of 2015, the company received shareholder approval to convert to a REIT. (On March 2, 2015, LADR said that shareholders had approved the plan to restructure as a REIT).
LADR has maintained a disciplined credit culture throughout the organization with zero credit losses since inception. The company operates as an internally-managed REIT (the other peers referenced are externally managed) that originated first mortgages secured by commercial real estate and invests in commercial properties and highly-rated CMBS (commercial mortgage-backed securities).
LADR has stable and diverse income streams from Commercial Real Estate; the company’s tactical approach to the mREIT sector is rooted in the flexible manner in which the company can interact in periods of change. As illustrated below, LADR can capitalize on its 3 primary lines of business in order to take advantage of the most profitable trends:
As illustrated below, LADR invests in predominantly Senior Secured Asset Base of Commercial Real Estate-Related Investments:
LADR's Senior Secured Balance Sheet business represents around 40% of revenue and this business is similar to Blackstone Mortgage Trust (NYSE:BXMT) and Starwood Property Trust (NYSE:STWD). Generally, LADR's loans are for 2-to-5-year terms.
LADR's conduit finance business represents around 10% of revenue, and this business line is comparable to STWD's subsidiary called LNR. Conduit loans are typically 5 to 10 years, offered at fixed rate with LTVs (loan to value) of around 70% to 75%. LADR has a balanced securitization model with over $1.7 billion in loans (with an average loan balance of around $17 million).
The CMBS business is the "bread and butter" for LADR and represents around 10% of revenue and almost all of LADR's CMBS product is investment grade (focused on senior secured). LADR takes advantage of market disruptions - when it's hard to lend, LADR invests in CMBS.
The final leg to the stool is LADR's equity platform - representing around 10% of revenue. Around 50% of the equity investments are Net Lease properties representing around 3.6 million square feet. LADR owns 22 free-standing Walgreens (NASDAQ:WBA) and 7 Hy-Vee grocery stores. In addition, LADR owns several office buildings and several condo deals in Las Vegas.
So Why the REIT Structure?
As referenced above, LADR converted to a REIT earlier this year and the structural benefits allow the company more efficiency of capital flow. Accordingly, the REIT structure appears to fit more squarely (no pun intended as it relates to the triangle) into LADR's business model, given the compelling profits and enhanced potential for growth (in normalized book value).
What makes LADR uniquely positioned (in my opinion) is the fact that the company is able to consistently generate industry-leading ROE that is the result of a solid base of REIT earnings. Here's a snapshot of LADR's balance sheet that includes assets predominantly held for investment.
What makes LADR unique is the solid baseline REIT ROE plus potential TRS upside. Even with share price volatility, LADR is making 10-13% ROAE:
Compared with the select peer group (below) LADR's REIT structure optimizes after-tax earnings, paving the way for strong ROE combined with meaningful cash dividends.
LADR minimizes reliance on access to capital markets and facilitates "offensive" capital deployment. While the dividend is well covered, LADR's capital recycling business drives attractive ROE and book value growth.
While most Commercial mREITs have payout ratios close to 100%, LADR's conservative leadership team opted to keep the ratio lower. That's a unique characteristic and one that resonates with my style of investing.
With such a low payout ratio, you would think that LADR would be paying out a low dividend yield, it's not.
So you are not only getting an attractive 8.9% dividend yield, but also a "true-up" dividend at the end of the year. LADR’s current dividend is $.30 per share and the company has continued to provide ample cash flow to support the dividend.
In Q1-17, LADR generated core earnings of $31.6 million. This amount compares to $38.2 million in the first quarter of the prior year. Core EPS for the first quarter was $0.31 per share compared to $0.38 per share for the same quarter a year ago.
On an after-tax core basis, LADR generated 9% return on average equity during Q1-17, down from 10.8% in Q1-16. This is based on an average equity balance, excluding non-controlling interest of consolidated joint ventures, of approximately $1.5 billion.
Keep in mind that LADR’s $31.6 million of core earnings were achieved without the benefit of any securitization gains, and less than $5 million of core gains from real estate and security sales. The remaining core earnings were derived from LADR’s solid foundational investment that generated recurring income in excess of total corporate expenses.
During Q1-17, LADR’s recurring net interest, net rental and fee income contributed $40.6 million to core earnings. These recurring revenues were more than 2.5 times the remaining core corporate expenses of $15.1 million incurred during the quarter. In other words, in the first quarter, LADR generated over $25 million of recurring core earnings (net of corporate expenses), the largest gap to core earnings adjustment for the quarter related to real estate depreciation.
LADR ended the quarter with total assets of $5.9 billion and total equity of $1.5 billion. The company’s core leverage increased to 2.9:1 from 2.6:1 during the quarter, impacted by the addition of new loan investments during the quarter and the inflation of other assets related to the bond payoff on April 3rd. Excluding the impact of this bond pay-off, LADR’s core debt to equity ratio would have been 2.7x.
LADR continued to enhance its maturity profile while maintaining a diverse set of funding sources. As of March 31, 2017, LADR had $4.3 billion of core debt outstanding and committed financing availability of over $1.8 billion for additional investments. The FHLB borrowings stood at $1.48 billion as of March 31, 2017.
Management Matters
I give a lot of credit to LADR’s management team for placing an emphasis on term funding with multiple counterparties. This has allowed the company to better manage duration risk and enhance overall diversity.
I’m also pleased to see a new investor join the mix. In a previous article, I explained that Related Companies purchased $80 million of LADR stock from certain pre-IPO shareholders, including affiliates of TowerBrook Capital Partners and GI Partners.
The investment was made by Related Real Estate Fund II, an opportunity fund, with equity commitments of over $1 billion. In conjunction with Related’s investment in LADR, the REIT agreed to appoint Richard O’Toole, Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Related, to replace Jonathan Bilzin, Managing Director of TowerBrook Capital Partners, on LADR’s Board of Directors.
I have frequently commented that “LADR is predominantly institutionally owned” with “two large sovereign wealth funds that accounted for around 16.5% of ownership.”
Related’s investment (in LADR) now provides the company with the much-needed float and further diversifies the base of shareholders in the commercial mortgage REIT. I am particularly happy to see Related make this investment, given the company’s deep experience in commercial real estate and success as a global luxury residential, retail, and mixed-use developer.
The Bottom Line: I am maintaining a Buy recommendation on shares of LADR. The dividend is safe and the 8.9% yield is attractive. I consider the strong insider ownership and internal management to be a critical part of my decision-making process and one good reason that I am maintaining a Buy on LADR shares.
To learn more about my REIT Beat service, click here. For a limited time, I am providing new subscribers with an autographed copy of The Intelligent REIT Investor. This is a limited offer, so don't miss out!
Brad Thomas is a Wall Street writer, and that means he is not always right with his predictions or recommendations. That also applies to his grammar. Please excuse any typos and be assured that he will do his best to correct any errors if they are overlooked.
Finally, this article is free and the sole purpose for writing it is to assist with research, while also providing a forum for second-level thinking. If you have not followed him, please take five seconds and click his name above (top of the page).
Disclosure: I am on the Advisory Board of NY Residential REIT, and I am also a shareholder and publisher on theMaven.
Sources: F.A.S.T. Graphs and LADR Investor Presentation.
Other REITs mentioned: STWD, JCAP, BXMT, ARI, ACRE and KREF.
This article was written by
Brad Thomas is the CEO of Wide Moat Research ("WMR"), a subscription-based publisher of financial information, serving over 100,000 investors around the world. WMR has a team of experienced multi-disciplined analysts covering all dividend categories, including REITs, MLPs, BDCs, and traditional C-Corps.
The WMR brands include: (1) iREIT on Alpha (Seeking Alpha), and (2) The Dividend Kings (Seeking Alpha), and (3) Wide Moat Research. He is also the editor of The Forbes Real Estate Investor.
Thomas has also been featured in Barron's, Forbes Magazine, Kiplinger’s, US News & World Report, Money, NPR, Institutional Investor, GlobeStreet, CNN, Newsmax, and Fox.
He is the #1 contributing analyst on Seeking Alpha in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022 (based on page views) and has over 108,000 followers (on Seeking Alpha). Thomas is also the author of The Intelligent REIT Investor Guide (Wiley) and is writing a new book, REITs For Dummies.
Thomas received a Bachelor of Science degree in Business/Economics from Presbyterian College and he is married with 5 wonderful kids. He has over 30 years of real estate investing experience and is one of the most prolific writers on Seeking Alpha. To learn more about Brad visit HERE.Analyst’s Disclosure: I am/we are long APTS, ARI, BRX, BXMT, CCI, CCP, CHCT, CLDT, CONE, CORR, CUBE, DLR, DOC, EXR, FPI, GMRE, GPT, HASI, HTA, IRM, JCAP, KIM, LADR, LTC, LXP, O, OHI, PEB, PK, QTS, ROIC, SKT, SNR, SPG, STAG, STOR, STWD, TCO, UBA, VER, WPC. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.