Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

Climate Change Investing: Momentum Building, Trump Notwithstanding

Jul. 12, 2017 10:53 AM ETABBNY, BAYRY, DD, ENGIY, FLR, GE, GSK, INO, JPM, JSAIY, MON-OLD, MRK, ORA, PFE, SHEL, SIEGY, SNY, SPWR, SZEVY, TTE, VEOEY, VOLVY113 Comments
Henry Miles profile picture
Henry Miles
2.36K Followers

Summary

  • We continue to be inundated with news about climate change containing items of actions that governments and businesses are taking to help address the situation.
  • With a couple of notable exceptions, overall during the last six months, the stocks in my climate change book kept pace with the major indexes including the S&P 500.
  • I have added two investments to the portfolio reflecting the European Union’s commitment to lead in the race where President Trump has decided to withdraw.

This is my third semi-annual article about climate change investing. I've come to appreciate the visceral reaction the topic elicits from those who choose to turn away from the massive amount of time-series science that our planet is changing in destructive ways. Nevertheless, as has been my practice in the past, I begin this article with links to statistics, observations, and news items about climate change from a wide cross-section of sources. All date stamps are within the last six months, meaning there is no overlap to that which I referenced in previous articles:

This article was written by

Henry Miles profile picture
2.36K Followers
Now retired after forty years in financial services: a) analyzing corporate, bank, and sovereign risk, b) predicting bankruptcies and conducting commercial workouts, restructurings, and dissolutions, c) financing grain, soft commodities, oil, and the precious metal trade internationally, d) overseeing interbank finance and arbitrage, e) modeling and assessing the productivity of financial business units, f) directing aspects of M&A due diligence and post-acquisition integrations, g) serving as Chief Information Officer of a major full-service broker-dealer, h) consulting including as interim management to global banks, investment advisors, trust companies, and alternative investment / hedge funds, and i) serving as managing general partner of a family farm. An MBA, educated in economics, with a near minor in math, who held various securities industry licenses including Series 7, 63, 24, and 14 (all now expired). A donor and volunteer now focused on: a) public works landscape projects, b) helping motivated, first-in-family, degree and certificate-bound kids achieve their education, and c) developing STEM skills in primary and secondary school students. Formerly, an advisory board member of The Trust for Public Land involved with park and conservation projects including creating the first piece of a 10,000 acre metro wildlife area, and a produce farm in a distressed inner-city neighborhood. (All my proceeds from writing on Seeking Alpha go to charity.) Like I do when investing, always do your own due diligence in consultation with a licensed and competent financial/investment advisor(s) who puts your interests ahead of their own; if you don't have one, find one.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I am/we are long GE, SIEGY, ABB, ORA, SZEVY, VEOEY, DD, MON, INO, GSK, MRK, PFE, SNY, FLR, TOT, ENGIY, RDS.B. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Always do your own due diligence in consultation with a competent financial adviser who puts your interests ahead of their own. Remember, there are added considerations in owning foreign securities including those associated with buying and selling the pinks, foreign withholding taxes on dividends, and ADR fees. (All my proceeds from contributing to SA go to charity.)

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

Comments (113)

Henry Miles profile picture
All eyes on Irma.
cluebert profile picture
no no can't be. Were is our 500 years!?
MWinMD profile picture
It's apparently breaking the scale. It's bordering on Cat 6, if such a thing existed.
cluebert profile picture
Oh those darned scientists didn't tell us *THIS* would happen.

(my own personal fear ever since getting woken up by The Inconvenient Truth, was that scientists were wrong.... too conservative in their estimates. My cousin works at NASA in their climate research group. He describes their computer model as 30 years of legacy fortran running on a supercomputer. No distributed computing here. And not much in the way of feedback loops.. like the tundra melting, or algae growing on the top of Greenland ice are included in the model. )
MWinMD profile picture
Fossil fuel-driven warming responsible for about 30% of the record rainfall in Houston's latest (three in the past three years) 500-year flood. Warmer ocean, warmer air, higher sea levels for storm surge, and (most importantly I gather) slower-moving weather systems in North America in recent years due to Arctic warming, which resulted in Harvey setting up shop and renting a hotel room in Houston for the week.

"Harvey is What Climate Change Looks Like"

http://tinyurl.com/yae...
cluebert profile picture
As the president said. 1C is a tiny number. It's a very teensy weensy number that has no significance. So we really don't need to worry. OK?
rodness profile picture
Lol nice sarcasm sunburntb :-)
cluebert profile picture
Thanks.
Henry Miles profile picture
At the request of Mayor Turner, the Greater Houston Community Foundation has set up the “Hurricane Harvey Relief Fund”. Community Foundations are generally very good at deploying funds, based on the greatest need, to bona fide charities in their ‘backyard’. The foundation can be found online at https://ghcf.org. (The new fund displays prominently on their home page.) If you haven't already, please consider supporting our global neighbors in Texas as they cope with the devastating situation there. Thank you.
cluebert profile picture
Maybe a better plan to buy some PEGI or CSIQ or just install solar panels on your roof & get an electric car for your garage. The other option is a once in 500 year storm every year.

40 Billion cleanup costs would have installed 30GW solar capacity.

Are we REALLY saving money by not quickly moving to solar / wind? I don't think so.
cluebert profile picture
ps. obviously it's a good idea to donate & help those in need right now.

I desperately hope there is finally a discussion about climate change & how we need a "get it done" sort of plan.
I
Henry, thank you. The sun has finally come out and the rain has stopped. I think it is time for the war mists to stop using a disaster to push their agenda. A la the comments back to you. Izzy
Henry Miles profile picture
Momentum building -- https://seekingalpha.c...
Henry Miles profile picture
More bad news -- http://bit.ly/2vGE6XO
ChechitoEV profile picture
haha mostly, those are not "climate change" stocks. Geez! Thanks God Americans kicked Barry out of the WH and elected President Trump to make America great again.
Craig Lehman profile picture
"In the past, under some criticism, I have categorized folks in three ways - acceptors, deniers and skeptics."

A term that has come into some use is "lukewarmist"; i.e. one who grants that there is some warming and some of it is human-caused, but observes that the forecasts (such as James Hansen's famous 1988 prediction of two degrees of warming by 2020) have been consistently on the (very) high side, sometimes bordering on hysteria. Lukewarmists are also, unlike the typical "acceptor", willing to look at possible non-human causes for climate variability, such as the Svensmark cosmic-ray hypothesis currently being tested at CERN. Given all the reading you've done in the field, I'm surprised that your classification of viewpoints misses this one.

While I'm all for your principle of finding as many good reasons to invest in a stock as possible, I do think it's somewhat of a stretch to invest in e.g. the drug companies as a climate-change play. E.g., HASI looks like a much more direct way to go about it, and it works whether or not catastrophic predictions turn out to be true.
Henry Miles profile picture
Craig

Thank you for your comment. I'd classify "Lukewarmist" as a gradation of "Skeptic"; farther than I want to parse things but point well taken.

I also appreciate your perspective on HASI. I'm a self-avowed stock-picker who does not invest through intermediaries although they are certainly suitable from some.

As to pharma, I've stated my reasons for investing in INO and the three majors. You are correct that it may be a stretch; if I were to narrow it down to two, they would be INO and SNY. In any event, people can disagree about such things, and I hope they do, for the purpose of advancing the discussion about what I have stated is a strategic area for investment.

Thanks again for your input; very much appreciated.

Henry
J
Well said
t
Gojada , thanks for your rational comments. Unfortunately the Scott Pruit and Rick Parry types will only begin to take climate change seriously when the effects are so obvious and calamities that they will be irreversible.
GreenAndGreen profile picture
Here's the strange predicament that many posters here have (seemingly unwittingly) stumbled into.

In addition to explicitly denying that humans have (or even might have) an impact on Earth's climate, they suggest that the idea of climate change is maliciously proliferated by multiple groups intent on profiteering from a movement to combat climate change.

The essence of these assertions is indicative of a conspiracy so large, complex, and widespread that it easily eclipses (pun intended) any other conspiracy theory ever put forth by any group. If I'm wrong, please suggest a more ubiquitous conspiracy theory.

The strange part about this stance is that you have to reliably prove that one of the following statements are true.

a) Tens of millions of individuals are working in collusion to deceive the global populus so that they may profit from an easily disproven idea

b) The bulk of the modern scientific community is absolutely unqualified to perform its duties adequately in which case we're screwed in dozens (if not hundreds) of areas that don't involve climate change

I for one find either of these possibilities difficult to subscribe to. Am I the only one?
Henry Miles profile picture
Gojada

You nailed it. No, you are not the only one; I completely agree. However, I'll stand down in hopes that a few of the deniers in this string answer your question. A credible answer would save me, and other writers in the space including Keith Williams above, a lot of time and effort. Thank you very much.

Henry
I
Go Jada, it only takes a few people to do this. The VP and a select group of CEOs. Having been part of it, I was appalled by what I saw! And the reason was clear, lining their pockets!
Craig Lehman profile picture
What we have here is a classic false dichotomy, in which you're either completely on board with the catastrophist "consensus", or a nutcase who adopts position a) or b). In fact, there are much more nuanced, in-between positions held by reasonable and scientifically qualified people. See my comment below.
Keith Williams profile picture
Hi Henry,

Thank you for another view of investing in a world with changing climate. I guess part of the issue with investing in major and diverse corporations is that new initiatives (like GE and wind) get diluted by the rest of the business.

I'm becoming more convinced that a key issue is how senior management is coping with the changes. Have you thought about profiling some companies using senior management preparedness as a significant part of your investment thesis. I like ENGIE for this reason and perhaps recent statements by Volvo CEO is another example. Could it be enough to change competitiveness?
Henry Miles profile picture
Keith

Thanks for chiming in. Yes, there is a conundrum here. One the one hand, and as I have noted, I am deploying capital toward dominant transnational companies that are materially, but not exclusively, focused on addressing the causes or consequences of climate change. My reasoning is twofold: a) they have the resources (well beyond financial) to make a significant impact, and b) this approach offers a level of 'internal diversification' to investors. A clean example of this is ABB that is both heavily involved with 'the grid' and industrial robotics.

On the other hand, to your point, the connection of these organizations' climate change activities gets diluted/'lost' by the rest of their business. In my view it would be a mistake to 'throw my our hands' and say, 'Well, never mind.' So, it would be helpful to tighten the link. That said, intangible factors may not help much either for the obvious reasons. I/we really do need to give more thought to this issue.

Henry
Keith Williams profile picture
Hi Henry,

I agree that there is much complexity involved with trying to be ahead of the curve!
J
True
I
Also, harvest was great despite wheat rust! Waiting on the beans. Prices are also great! Maybe the new 7 year cycle has started!
Henry Miles profile picture
I hope to hell you're right, Izzy. Corn broke through $4 a bushel earlier this week. I'm pulling for our farmers.
I
Henry, really getting in to retirement. Spent a month in Germany with family and a trip to Eastern Europe. Getting away to a cooler place next week. Great article! Take care, Izzy
I
Henry, just a follow on to climate change. If we are entering another ice age, what would you recommend for investors? Interestingly, I think it may be a very close list! Crop failures are more likely. Energy business is still strong to fend off cold. Pharma will be more needed to deal with increasing disease. As you know, I was toying with this over our farms. Also, thermal power cycles may be enhanced as volcanic activity increases? Just saying, Izzy
cluebert profile picture
ICE AGE??? what rock do you live under? freak!
Henry Miles profile picture
Interesting statement. Probably, about half of the same ideas, less vaccine developers/distributors and companies involved with fresh water and flood control.
I
Water companies will probably become more important as the rain cycle will be disrupted!
I
Henry, most viruses are spread by human/carrier methods not airborne by climate change. In Zika and west Nile, the carrier is the mosquito. If you look at the spread and the reasons, you see the patterns! Take care, Izzy
cluebert profile picture
man are you human or a mosquito yourself? Your brain seems to be the size of a freaking mosquito.
Henry Miles profile picture
For sure, to an extent. Except that: a) It's hard to convince people not to have sex, and b) Once it makes it to (warmer) northern climes acceptable to the vector, the game may change. Thanks, Izzy.
I
Henry, no humans who have been infected in Latin America by mosquitos return to US are bitten by mosquitos here and then it starts here. That is why so many were quarantined. Had two daughters in law who feared infection as they were both carrying daughters.
When west Nile came, I had to bury a lot of blue jays and cardinals as they were particularly suspect I left. We had one cardinal who survived. I named him Henry! That was before we went China! He is still here, minus his topknot, which he lost with all the feathers on his head! Take care, Izzy
k
Henry,

You may also consider adding some "defense" stocks to your portfolio. Climate change is expected to worsen droughts and cause large portions of the Middle East to become nearly uninhabitable. The current refugee crisis is a drop in the bucket compared to what is to come from the mass exodus away from ~150 degree temperatures. Some additional reading you may be interested in is about how the current historic drought helped cause instability in Syria.

When you combine mass climate migrations with reduced global food production and spreading disease, the obvious outcome is political instability and armed conflict.

It's not a bright future, but in a world where money = power, our only hope as individuals is to invest wisely and pray we accumulate enough assets to be one of the lucky few to maintain some standard of living.

Best of luck to you - appreciate these articles.
Henry Miles profile picture
Hey 813, thanks for chiming in. In fact, for 2+ years, I've held another portfolio of military defense stocks (and have also written on the subject). They have done extremely well for me but I'm not making any connection --at least yet -- to climate change.
Henry Miles profile picture
Mark

Thank you for your insightful comment. As everyone should know from my bio, I'm a financial and systems guy, not a climate scientist. Therefore, I must ground my financial articles on the extensive reading I do about climate change, most of it written by scientists and other professional observers.

From the vastness of that research, I select about a dozen articles to imbed in the bullet points near the top of each my articles. I attempt to 'come at it' from different perspectives, and to include links that I hope will interest others as they do me. Mark, as you know better than almost anyone, my selection barely skims the surface.

But, those rolling sets of bullet points with imbedded links are enough for me to reaffirm, as a premise, and as I have stated outright, "that climate change, contributed by humans, is upon us with escalating negative effects." Whether others accept this premise is entirely up to them.

However, for those do, we can then shift to a discussion of my hypothesis on how to invest into the phenomenon for which I will provide ideas and track results every six months, for better or for worse.

You challenge all of us to think through how to apply the expertise of others against the limits of our own reasoning to move forward as we choose. I deeply appreciate your comment and I commend everyone to reach out to you as a true expert in the area of climate change. Again, thank you.

Henry
MTrexler profile picture
I did think it hilarious that the trillion-ton iceberg broke off overnight, rendering your piece instantly out-of-date! :-) Its been in the process of calving for 10 years; you should be honored!

NOTE to Others: I am not suggesting this particular iceberg is a result of climate change, nor am I erroneously suggesting that sea levels have now risen by an inch (they haven't). Just FYI, the real question with this iceberg is whether the land-based glaciers previously locked behind it will now accelerate their movement to the coast - which would raise sea levels.
Henry Miles profile picture
As I understand floating ice, your comment is right on about no effect on sea levels. At the same time, I'm glad you mentioned the 'barrier-effect' that the shelf has on landlocked ice/glaciers.
cluebert profile picture
Of course it is climate change caused by co2. Get with it people.
MTrexler profile picture
Every time Henry posts one of his climate portfolio blogs I am interested in the distribution of comments. Here's my hypothesis at this point:There is a strong correlation between people who perceive themselves as being able out-think most others in their area of expertise - stock markets - and people who think they can out-think others even in areas they have no expertise in.

If a bunch of scientists suddenly came to these boards and started weighing in on their totally random stock-picks, how would people on the boards react? Negatively? With ridicule? But when the large majority of people responding to Henry's piece randomly comment on climate science where they have no expertise at all, they see no contradiction. I realize it's human nature, but that doesn't make it any more legitimate.
N
I hear Al Gore is set to start his own REIT, with the real estate holdings comprised of his vast collection of enormous personal mansions. In addition to various mortgage instruments and capital gains from sales of these properties, there are also large ownership stakes in the surrounding utilities needed to power these glorious luxury compounds.

The impressive combined square footage and outsized energy inefficiency of Mr. Gore's many homes will make this REIT a cash machine.

Does Prius make a truck? If so, back it up when Scheming Con Artist Millionaire Realty, Inc. (ticker symbol: SCAM) launches its IPO!
Henry Miles profile picture
Daniel

Thank you for your comment. The overall point of the article is found in its title, 'momentum is building'. The point of my investing, as I stated, is, "toward dominant transnational companies that are materially, not exclusively, focused on addressing the causes and[/or] consequences of the phenomenon [climate change]". I am aware that I'm ahead of the game on some holdings but, in my view, that's what investing is about. Finally, as I said with respect to Macron, I resonate with environmentally-aware capitalists meaning that there is nothing wrong, and everything right, with making money while do what is globally responsible. Thanks again; these are important exchanges to have as we all decide: a) whether we want to pursue investments in the area and, b) if so, how to go about it.

Henry
Intrepid Investor profile picture
Best article of the day, Henry Miles. I think your title captures a theme some of us hope for. Just another example (in addition to tech and the immigration issue) of corporate leaders leading the way which is okay just so the leadership comes from somewhere.
Henry Miles profile picture
Intrepid

Thank you for your comment. We must have been reading one another's minds as I was posting my response to Daniel below, just seconds behind your above. Thanks, again!

Henry
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!
To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.