Why Does The Bitcoin Fork Make You Richer?

Aug. 03, 2017 3:07 PM ET6 Comments
Jeroen Blokland profile picture
Jeroen Blokland


  • The Bitcoin fork has increased total Bitcoin market cap by roughly USD 7 billion, all of which is represented by the 'new' coin, Bitcoin Cash.
  • But the increase in value is difficult to explain using a traditional investing approach.
  • No additional growth opportunities have been created that allow for a skewed increase in total market cap.

As a traditional investor I’m intrigued by what has happened with Bitcoin in recent days. Because the bitcoin community, developers, miners, exchanges, and so on, couldn’t agree on how to scale bitcoin, enabling it to process more transactions, a hard fork has occurred. While this is already difficult to comprehend - the fork means we now have two digital ‘currencies’, Bitcoin (BTC) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH), instead of just Bitcoin – I’m also intrigued by the fact that, at least for now, this fork made a lot of people richer.

Now, before I try to figure out for why that is, I strongly recommend you get some idea of what the Bitcoin fork implies, especially if you are a traditional investor. Bitcoin investing is in no way comparable to investing in plain vanilla stocks and bonds, and there’s an awful lot of tech stuff you have to grasp, something I find extremely difficult at times.

Ok back to the fork then. Did you know that if you held your private Bitcoin keys prior to the hard fork you now also own the equivalent amount of Bitcoin Cash? That’s right for every single unit of Bitcoin you owned pre-fork, you now also hold one unit of Bitcoin Cash. This is basically the whole idea of a hard fork. The interesting thing is, though, that your total ‘Bitcoin’ wealth is up.

How can that be? Perhaps the best way to find out is to use a traditional investment example. Suppose you own stock in a company that is worth USD 100, called SEASONS. This company manufactures both umbrellas and ice cream. This is a pretty cool combination because it offers you instant diversification effects. SEASONS sells mostly ice cream in summer, and then switches to umbrellas in winter. Since ice cream can be sold year-round, this part of the company makes up 70% of the total value, while umbrella’s make up 30% of total value.

Now suppose SEASONS decides to spin off the umbrella part of the company, named RAIN, what would be the total value of the two companies after the split? Well, it goes without saying that producing ice cream and umbrellas has little to do with each other, which implies there are hardly any synergies. Therefore, the most likely outcome would be that, after the split, SEASONS, is worth about USD 70 and RAIN about USD 30. There could be some deviation, for example there could be some kind of premium since the two separate companies can now focus on just one product, but at the same time the separate companies lose their diversification benefit, making them more exposed to a single season.

Before I try to link Bitcoin’s fork, let’s look at another example with a different outcome. This time you own stock in a company worth USD 100, called CARS, that manufactures two kinds of cars, sedans (70% of company value) and SUVs (30% of company value). Both of them are manufactured on the same assembly line. Now, imagine that the company has to scale up production to meet future demand. However, the most efficient way to scale up the production of sedans is to extend the existing assembly line, whereas the most efficient way to increase the production of SUVs is to build another assembly line.

In this case spinning of the production of SUVs into a separate company, SUV, creates growth opportunities for both new companies that, in the previous situation would not have emerged. As a result, the value of both companies goes up, resulting in a total company value bigger than USD 100.

So, how does the Bitcoin fork relate to these examples? Judging by the current market cap not much with the first one. At the time of writing the total market cap of Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash is USD 52.4 billion. Before the fork, the total market cap of Bitcoin was USD 44 billion. Hence, the fork in Bitcoin has created almost 20% in value, instantly. Interestingly, all of that additional value is represented by Bitcoin Cash, as the market cap of Bitcoin is almost unchanged compared to the market cap just before the fork. What separates Bitcoin from Bitcoin Cash is its scaling solution. Based on developments in market cap, it seems that one scaling solution has unlocked value for a part of the Bitcoin community, while the other solution did not. Or, perhaps more likely, the Bitcoin scaling solution was already priced in.

Still the skewed increase in total market cap does raise questions. First, for many users or investors scaling was a necessity, but the way to do it was less important. I’m no expert, but reaching some kind of consensus was probably key for many. Second, since no complete consensus was reached we now have two different ‘currencies’, with two different scaling solutions. Surely a bit confusing, which most of the time puts downward pressure on the value of the underlying asset. Third, reading some of the statements of wallets and exchanges, I get the impression Bitcoin Cash does not immediately offer new growth opportunities. Many of these wallets and exchanges will not support Bitcoin Cash at first. It’s not like the SUV company mentioned above. Fourth, getting your hands on your freshly mined BCHs is far from straightforward at this point in time.

Hence, the Bitcoin fork once again shows that Bitcoin investing is very different from traditional investing.

This article was written by

Jeroen Blokland profile picture
Jeroen Blokland works as a senior portfolio manager at Robeco, leading asset manager from the Netherlands. He manages several multi asset portfolios for both institutional and retail clients. He regularly writes columns for (Dutch) financial websites and has his own financial markets blog. You can follow him on Twitter, @jsblokland

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.