Finding the best mutual funds is an increasingly difficult task in a world with so many to choose from. How can you pick with so many choices available?
Don’t Trust Mutual Fund Labels
There are at least 921 different Large Cap Value mutual funds and at least 6265 mutual funds across twelve styles. Do investors need 522+ choices on average per style? How different can the mutual funds be?
Those 921 Large Cap Value mutual funds are very different. With anywhere from 20 to 744 holdings, many of these Large Cap Value mutual funds have drastically different portfolios, creating drastically different investment implications.
The same is true for the mutual funds in any other style, as each offers a very different mix of good and bad stocks. Large Cap Blend mutual funds rank first for stock selection. Small Cap Growth mutual funds rank last. Details on the Best & Worst mutual funds in each style are here.
Paralysis By Analysis
We think the large number of Large Cap Value (or any other) style mutual funds hurts investors more than it helps because too many options can be paralyzing. It is simply not possible for the majority of investors to properly assess the quality of so many mutual funds. Analyzing mutual funds, done with the proper diligence, is far more difficult than analyzing stocks because it means analyzing all the stocks within each mutual fund. As stated above, that can be as many as 744 stocks, and sometimes even more, for one mutual fund.
Anyone focused on fulfilling the fiduciary duty of care recognizes that analyzing the holdings of a mutual fund is critical to finding the best mutual fund. Figure 1 shows our top rated mutual fund for each style.
Figure 1: The Best Mutual Fund in Each Style
Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings
Amongst the mutual funds in Figure 1, the AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFIX) ranks first overall, the Fidelity SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund (FUQIX) ranks second, and the BMO Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVEX) ranks third. The AllianzGI NFJ Small Cap Value Fund (ANFVX) ranks last.
How To Avoid “The Danger Within”
Why do you need to know the holdings of mutual funds before you buy?
You need to be sure you do not buy a fund that might blow up. Buying a fund without analyzing its holdings is like buying a stock without analyzing its business and finances. No matter how cheap, if it holds bad stocks, the mutual fund’s performance will be bad. Don’t just take my word for it, see what Barron’s says on this matter.
PERFORMANCE OF FUND’S HOLDINGS = PERFORMANCE OF FUND
Analyzing each holding within funds is no small task. Our Robo-Analyst technology enables us to perform this diligence with scale and provide the research needed to fulfill the fiduciary duty of care. More of the biggest names in the financial industry (see At BlackRock, Machines Are Rising Over Managers to Pick Stocks) are now embracing technology to leverage machines in the investment research process. Technology may be the only solution to the dual mandate for research: cut costs and fulfill the fiduciary duty of care. Investors, clients, advisors and analysts deserve the latest in technology to get the diligence required to make prudent investment decisions.
If Only Investors Could Find Funds Rated by Their Holdings
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund is not only the top-rated Large Cap Blend mutual fund, but is also the overall best style mutual fund out of the 6265 style mutual funds that we cover.
The mutual funds in Figure 1 all receive an Attractive-or-better rating. However, with so few assets in some of the funds, it is clear investors haven’t identified these quality mutual funds.
This article originally published on October 25, 2017.
Disclosure: David Trainer, Kyle Guske II, and Kenneth James receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, style, or theme.
 Ernst & Young’s recent white paper “Getting ROIC Right” proves the superiority of our holdings research and analytics.
Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.
I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.