By Tom Goodwin, senior research director
In a previous post, I discussed how a tilt-tilt approach to multi-factor index construction can minimize the dilution of competing factors while still maintaining diversification. But there's yet another benefit to consider: the tilt-tilt approach can be extended to encompass environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations.
While factor investing has been on the rise, so too has ESG-conscious investing. As investors are increasingly looking to incorporate ESG considerations into their investment approach, indexes using the tilt-tilt methodology offer a flexible and consistent solution. This is because ESG indexes have evolved such that investors are doing a sort of "tilting" already - they're tilting positively toward company activities that manage ESG risk exposures effectively, while at the same time tilting away from those companies that are behind the curve.
As such, the tilting idea naturally suggests analogues to factor scores: drawing on FTSE Russell's extensive database on a wide range of ESG-related metrics to create scores from 0 to 1 that can be used as additional "factors" in a multi-factor index. With this approach, stocks that may have been excluded by a negative screen instead have their weights reduced to the degree that the company demonstrates weak ESG practices. At the same time, those companies that have engaged in strong ESG practices would have their weights increased.
By design, the tilt-tilt methodology not only makes for easy integration of ESG measures, but also offers the ability to do so without sacrificing factor exposure strength. This is particularly true when compared to the composite approach to multi-factor index construction. As discussed in my previous post, the composite index approach is another widely used approach that simply takes the arithmetic average of the factors.
To illustrate this point, let's say an investor is looking to incorporate low carbon emissions measures into a value factor index. As stand-alone indexes, the Broad Value Factor Index has a negative 3% exposure to carbon emission reduction, and the CO2 Emission Index has no active value exposure.
As shown below, a composite approach results in reduced exposure to both the value factor and carbon emissions reduction when compared to their respective standalone indexes. However, the integrated tilt-tilt approach maintains both value factor exposure and carbon emissions reduction.
This demonstrates how the FTSE Russell tilt-tilt approach is not only a natural fit for integrating ESG considerations into a multi-factor index, but also enables investors to do so without compromising factor exposure strength. Please refer to our recently published research paper, "Multi-factor indexes: The power of tilting," for a deeper dive into this topic.
© 2017 London Stock Exchange Group plc and its applicable group undertakings (the "LSE Group"). The LSE Group includes (1) FTSE International Limited ("FTSE"), (2) Frank Russell Company ("Russell"), (3) FTSE TMX Global Debt Capital Markets Inc. and FTSE TMX Global Debt Capital Markets Limited (together, "FTSE TMX") and (4) MTSNext Limited ("MTSNext"). All rights reserved.
FTSE Russell® is a trading name of FTSE, Russell, FTSE TMX and MTS Next Limited. "FTSE®", "Russell®", "FTSE Russell®" "MTS®", "FTSE TMX®", "FTSE4Good®" and "ICB®" and all other trademarks and service marks used herein (whether registered or unregistered) are trademarks and/or service marks owned or licensed by the applicable member of the LSE Group or their respective licensors and are owned, or used under licence, by FTSE, Russell, MTSNext, or FTSE TMX.
All information is provided for information purposes only. Every effort is made to ensure that all information given in this publication is accurate, but no responsibility or liability can be accepted by any member of the LSE Group nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for any errors or for any loss from use of this publication or any of the information or data contained herein.
No member of the LSE Group nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or impliedly, either as to the results to be obtained from the use of the FTSE Russell indexes or the fitness or suitability of the indexes for any particular purpose to which they might be put.
No member of the LSE Group nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors provide investment advice and nothing in this communication should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice. No member of the LSE Group nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in any asset. A decision to invest in any such asset should not be made in reliance on any information herein. Indexes cannot be invested in directly. Inclusion of an asset in an index is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold that asset. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from a licensed professional.
No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the applicable member of the LSE Group. Use and distribution of the LSE Group index data and the use of their data to create financial products require a licence from FTSE, Russell, FTSE TMX, MTSNext and/or their respective licensors.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of investable assets. Certain returns shown may reflect back-tested performance. All performance presented prior to the index inception date is back-tested performance. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. The back-test calculations are based on the same methodology that was in effect when the index was officially launched. However, back-tested data may reflect the application of the index methodology with the benefit of hindsight, and the historic calculations of an index may change from month to month based on revisions to the underlying economic data used in the calculation of the index.