Vanguard recently released a set of five actively managed sector ETFs and one multi-factor ETF. Here we examine the Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and estimate its future performance.
Vanguard’s investment strategy
The investment strategy described in VFMO’s prospectus is to target primarily U.S. stocks
... with strong recent performance as determined by the advisor.
According to Vanguard:
Each new factor-based product must adhere to an enduring, logical rationale backed by empirical evidence …
However, there is no evidence presented that stocks with strong recent performance will earn a higher return going forward than those with a weaker recent performance.
Our 2018 test portfolio
On Feb-24-2018, we, at iMarketSignals, selected a portfolio of stocks from the Russell 3000 using similar criteria as Vanguard. Using Portfolio123, we designed a universe, which after applying a liquidity and 1-year return filter held 639 stocks. Together those 639 stocks had an average return of 71% over the preceding year (Figure-1), not much different from the 637 stocks of the current holding of VFMO which had an average return of 62% over the same period (Figure-2).
In Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4 the red graph depicts the performance of the universes’ holdings, and the blue graph the performance of benchmark iShares Momentum ETF (MTUM). Also our portfolio exhibited an overlap of 79% with VFMO’s holdings, i.e. 501 stocks from our universe were also represented in the holdings of VFMO. One can therefore reasonably conclude that our stock selection process does not differ much from that of Vanguard’s advisors and can be used to simulate past performance of VFMO.
Our 2017 test portfolio
We tested our simulation of Vanguard’s strategy by repeating the stock selection process for a universe dated Feb-24-2017 and found a portfolio of 576 stocks, which showed strong recent performance with an average return of 105% over the preceding year (Figure-3). According to Vanguard one can expect those stocks to show a higher return after Feb-24-2017 than the broader market. However this is not the case. Figure-4 shows the performance over the following 6 months to Aug-24-2017, with the 2017 Test Portfolio returning 0% while MTUM returned 14%, and SPY returned 4% (not shown). Over 12 months this 2017 portfolio consistently underperformed the broader market as represented by SPY, while MTUM far outperformed both.
We again tested our simulation of Vanguard’s strategy by repeating the stock selection process for a universe dated Jul-1-2014 and found a portfolio of 652 stocks which showed strong recent performance with an average return of 77% over the preceding year. For the following 6 month to 12/31/2014 the 2014 portfolio showed a loss of -3.0%, MTUM returned 7.3%, and SPY returned 5.4%.
Vanguard's selection strategy targeting stocks with strong recent performance and expecting that they will perform better than stocks with weak recent performance is tainted by survivorship bias.
Past performance does not guarantee future performance, and no stock can go up forever. Our analysis shows that the strongest among the recent winners may be the ones most vulnerable, and does not support Vanguard’s unsubstantiated claim that stocks with strong recent performance have tended to earn a higher return than those with weak recent performance.
It will be interesting to monitor the performance of VFMO over the next year. Our expectation is that it will underperform SPY and MTUM.
Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.
I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.