Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

Weekly CEF Roundup: A Rights, A Tender, A Merger

Apr. 03, 2018 8:16 PM ETACV, ASG, AVK, BFK, BFY, BKN, BQH, BSD, BXMX, BYM, CGO, CIF, CXH, DBL, AGD, DHY, DIAX, DSE, DSU, EFL, ETV, KYN, FPL, FTF, FUND, GBAB, GER, GGM-OLD, GGT, GIM, GLO, GLQ, GLV, HTY, IAF, JFR, JHA, JHB, JHD, JHI, JHS, JHY, JMM, JQC, JRS, JTA, JTD, LGI, MCA, MCR, MFL, MFV, MGF, MHD, MHE, MIN, MMT, MNE, MPA, MPV, MUE, MUI, MVF, MVT, MXF, MYC, MYD, MYJ, MZA, NAN, NAV, NAZ, NBB, NBD, NCA, NHA, NID, NIQ, NKG, NKX, NMZ, NNC, NOM, NPN, NRK, NTX, NEA, NZF, NXC, PAI, PIM, PYN, QQQX, RMT, RQI, RVT, SPXX, NXG, TEI, TSI, TTP, TY, VCV, VGM, VKI, VKQ, VMM23 Comments

Summary

  • CEFs reversed course this week with only 2 sectors positive by price and NAV.
  • SZC rights offer, CXH tender offer and Advent/Claymore merger are discussed.
  • RQI, GGT, ASG and FPL gained 2% premium this week and are short-term sell candidates.

The Weekly CEF Roundup will be put out at the start of each week to summarize recent price movements in closed-end fund [CEF] sectors in the last week as well as to highlight recently concluded or upcoming corporate actions on CEFs, such as tender offers. Most of the information has been sourced from CEFInsight or the Closed-End Fund Center. I will also link to some articles from Seeking Alpha that I have found for useful reading over the past week. The searchable tag for this feature is "cildoc." Data are taken from the close of Friday, Mar. 16, 2018.

Weekly performance roundup

CEFs reversed course again this week, and only 2 out of 31 sectors were positive on price (down from 26 last week), with an average price return of -0.89% (down from 1.21%). The leaders were U.S. real state (+0.59%), Asia equities (+0.33%) and then followed by three fixed income sectors. The laggards were all equity sectors, led by MLPs (-3.52%) on the downside.

(Source: Stanford Chemist, CEFConnect)

Similarly, 2 out of 31 sectors were positive on NAV (down from 24 last week), while the average NAV return was -0.67% (down from 1.19%). U.S. real estate led with +0.44% NAV return, while MLPs lagged with -3.27% return.

(Source: Stanford Chemist, CEFConnect)

The sector with the highest premium is multi-sector income (-0.43%), while the sector with the highest discount is Latin American equity (-12.03%). The average sector discount is -6.64% (down from -6.43% last week).

(Source: Stanford Chemist, CEFConnect)

Preferreds showed the largest premium/discount increase (+0.30%), while tax-advantaged equities showed the largest premium/discount decline (-0.89%). The average change in premium/discount was -0.21% (down from 0.01% last week).

(Source: Stanford Chemist, CEFConnect)

The sector with the highest yield is MLPs (10.88%), followed by global growth & income (9.24%), multi-sector income (8.80%), global equity dividend (8.79%), and U.S. real estate (8.57%). Discounts and z-scores for

This article was written by

Stanford Chemist profile picture
18.94K Followers

Stanford Chemist is a scientific researcher by training. For the past decade he has been providing analysis and evidence-based ways of generating profitable investments with CEFs and ETFs. He leads the investing group Learn more.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

I am long the portfolio securities.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

Comments (23)

Steve Moore profile picture
RE: CXH (MFS Investment Grade Muni)...

There is a tender offer referenced above for 7.5% of outstanding shares at 98% of NAV. Some of these tenders have a special clause which states that those with 99 or fewer shares (odd lot shareholders) who tender all of their shares will have all of them taken. In other words, the small shareholders would not be prorated. Does anyone know if that clause is in the CXH tender offer? (I tried looking for a prospectus and was unable to find one)

If no answer here, I will try to call the information agent, Georgeson, (and my broker) but they don't always have the answer. If I find out anything definitive, I will report back here.
Stanford Chemist profile picture
Thanks Stock Market Steve

I do not think that CXH has an odd lot provision
http://bit.ly/2uNR09R
Steve Moore profile picture
It sounds like you are correct. It says that if more than 7.5% of shares are tendered (and that is a virtual certainty), then "purchases will be made on a pro rata basis." When there is an odd lot clause it will typically say something like "purchases will be made on a pro rata basis, except for shareholders who beneficially own 99 or fewer shares and tender all of their shares." So I will be shocked if everyone isn't prorated. Thanks for posting the link!
Stanford Chemist profile picture
Thanks Steve. I do wish odd lots were not prorated either!
f
Thanks for the data. Ugly market, I like W not M.
KYSANMAN profile picture
again, you are not covering the Senior Loan or floating rate CEFs at all. These have benefitted nicely from a rise in LIBOR......
Long BSL, BGB, BGX!
http://bit.ly/2GS3YZ4
Stanford Chemist profile picture
Thanks for the comment Kysanman. Agree that senior loan CEFs are benefiting from rising rates, several have raised distributions in the past month
Maks F. S. profile picture
They have benefited but not enough to cover their increased costs of leverage.

Across the board, floating rate senior loans are having meaningful coverage issues.

Keep in mind, with higher rates, we are also starting to see higher default rates.
scarp1952 profile picture
Always good info that is timely SC. I took a little hit on BKN and VKQ but I was expecting it. Munis are fairly predictable in the CEF funds world. Still much like a savings account paying well over 5% tax free. I don't try to play the the strategic exit game on these like others. Thanks
t
Where are you getting the numbers? Do you think QQQX is a buy candidate? The funds P/D is exploding.
Stanford Chemist profile picture
Hi thuesand and thanks for using your first comment in my article! I think QQQX is definitely a sell candidate at this juncture. The data are 2 weeks old now (as CIL members get a first look the weekly roundup).
jimklawyer profile picture
So ready for MLP recovery and outperformance, not to mention equity tax-advantaged funds recovery. Also, check out DDF's discount and yield.
tom007 profile picture
I, for one, am totally ready for the MLP recovery.
Stanford Chemist profile picture
Thank you jimk - me too!
Stanford Chemist profile picture
Thanks for the comment, tom
Maks F. S. profile picture
Will also add, I have recently written on NBB/NBD, and NHF, which covered the rights offering. Take a look at the links in my profile, http://bit.ly/2uMGPCw
Borbastic profile picture
I don't see an NBB-NBD article since July 2017. Can you point to it please?

If you're an NBB-NBD holder, please vote against the merger; there's nothing in it for holders but bigger discounts. These were scheduled to liquidate in 2020, but Nuveen greed has gotten in the way. And get a load of their comment about the liquidation causing capital gains, as if anyone holds taxable munis in a taxable account.
Stanford Chemist profile picture
Thank you Borbastic. I also agree that shareholders should vote to maintain the current liquidation schedule
Maks F. S. profile picture
Good stuff as always and thank you for the mentions.
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!
To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.