Valuation Dashboard: Energy And Materials - Update
Summary
- Valuation metrics in Energy and Materials.
- Evolution since last month.
- A list of stocks looking cheap in their industries.
This article series provides a monthly dashboard of industries in each sector of the GICS classification. It compares valuation and quality factors relative to their historical averages in each industry.
Executive Summary
Integrated Oil/Gas is undervalued for 3 valuation factors by 15% to 30% relative to historical averages. It is close to its historical average in profitability measured by median ROE. Paper/Wood and Metals/Mining are moderately overpriced and a bit above their baselines in profitability. Other industries in Energy and Materials are more overvalued. Packaging is the most overpriced combining all valuation metrics, but profitability is far above the historical average. At the opposite, profitability in Energy Equipment and Services is far below the baseline and can't be held as a justification for overpricing.
Anyway, I think systemic risk is more important than market valuation to manage a portfolio.
Since last month:
P/E has improved in Chemicals and Construction Materials, no significant change in other industries.
P/S has improved in Energy, Construction Materials, Packaging and deteriorated in Chemicals.
P/FCF has improved in groups except a moderate deterioration in Energy Equipment/Services.
ROE has improved in Construction Materials, Metals/Mining, no significant change elsewhere.
The SPDR Select Sector ETF in Energy (NYSEARCA:XLE) has outperformed the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) by about 4% and the Materials ETF (NYSEARCA:XLB) has lagged it by about 1%.
The five S&P 500 stocks in Energy and Materials with the best momentum in 1 month are Andeavor (ANDV), Apache Corp. (APA), ConocoPhillips (COP), Hess Corp. (HES), Marathon Petroleum Corp. (MPC).
Some Cheap Stocks In Their Industries
The stocks listed below are in the S&P 1500 index, cheaper than their respective industry factor for Price/Earnings, Price/Sales and Price/Free Cash Flow. The 10 companies with the highest Return on Equity are kept in the final selection. Quantitative Risk & Value members have every month an early access to the cheap stock lists in all sectors before they are published in free-access articles. Click here to read about performances. This is not investment advice. Do your own research before buying.
Marathon Petroleum Corp. | OILGASFUEL | |
AdvanSix Inc. | CHEM | |
Eastman Chemical Co. | CHEM | |
LyondellBasell Industries | CHEM | |
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | METAL | |
Steel Dynamics Inc. | METAL | |
SunCoke Energy Inc. | METAL | |
Worthington Industries Inc. | METAL | |
Owens-Illinois Inc. | PACKAGING | |
Silgan Holdings Inc | PACKAGING |
Detail Of Valuation And Quality Indicators In Energy And Materials On 4/3/2018
I take 4 aggregate industry factors: Price/Earnings (P/E), Price to sales (P/S), Price to free cash flow (P/FCF), Return on Equity (ROE). My choice has been justified here and here. Their calculation aims at limiting the influence of outliers and large caps. They are reference values for stock picking, not for capital-weighted indices.
For each factor, I calculate the difference with its own historical average: to the average for valuation ratios, from the average for ROE, so that the higher is always the better. The difference is measured in percentage for valuation ratios, not for ROE (already in percentage).
The next table reports the 4 industry factors. There are 3 columns for each factor: the current value, the average ("Avg") between January 1999 and October 2015 taken as an arbitrary reference of fair valuation, and the difference explained above ("D-xxx").
P/E | Avg | D- P/E | P/S | Avg | D- P/S | P/FCF | Avg | D- P/FCF | ROE | Avg | D-ROE | |
Energy Equip./Sces | 31.38 | 24.2 | -29.67% | 1.25 | 1.73 | 27.75% | 41.4 | 35.34 | -17.15% | -9.11 | 7.34 | -16.45 |
Integrated Oil/Gas | 15.24 | 18.53 | 17.75% | 2.23 | 3.35 | 33.43% | 20.56 | 29.03 | 29.18% | 3.34 | 4.47 | -1.13 |
Chemicals | 20.69 | 18.48 | -11.96% | 1.63 | 1.21 | -34.71% | 31.12 | 25.37 | -22.66% | 11.39 | 6.74 | 4.65 |
Construction Materials | 21.24 | 21.44 | 0.93% | 1.78 | 1.16 | -53.45% | 81.38 | 40.5 | -100.94% | 11.75 | 5.77 | 5.98 |
Packaging | 23.98 | 17.96 | -33.52% | 1.13 | 0.61 | -85.25% | 30.85 | 20.09 | -53.56% | 21.92 | 8.34 | 13.58 |
Metals/Mining | 22.41 | 19.83 | -13.01% | 2.4 | 2.65 | 9.43% | 30.23 | 25.53 | -18.41% | -7.47 | -8.6 | 1.13 |
Paper/Wood | 23.58 | 21.27 | -10.86% | 0.97 | 0.72 | -34.72% | 16.74 | 22.81 | 26.61% | 9.65 | 4.99 | 4.66 |
The following charts give an idea of the current status of 3 valuation factors (P/E, P/S, P/FCF) and a quality factor (ROE) relative to their historical average in each industry. For all factors, the difference to average is calculated in the direction where positive is good. For valuation ratios, lower is better. For ROE, higher is better. On the charts below, higher is always better.
Price/Earnings relative to historical average:
Price/Sales relative to historical average:
Price/Free Cash Flow relative to historical average:
ROE relative to historical average:
Momentum
The next chart compares the price action of XLB and XLE with SPY in 1 month.
If you want to stay informed of my updates on this topic and other articles, click the "Follow" tab at the top of this article.
Data provided by portfolio123 (this is a partner link giving you an extended period of free trial. I may receive a fee if you buy later a paid subscription, at no additional cost to you).
This article was written by
Step up your investing experience: try Quantitative Risk & Value for free now (limited offer).
I am an individual investor and an IT professional, not a finance professional. My writings are data analysis and opinions, not investment advice. They may contain inaccurate information, despite all the effort I put in them. Readers are responsible for all consequences of using information included in my work, and are encouraged to do their own research from various sources.
Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.