Here Come The Rockets

Apr. 12, 2018 5:51 PM ETERUS, GLD, IAU, RSX, SPY57 Comments6 Likes


  • An airstrike on Syrian military targets seems highly likely.
  • Volatility could ensue, although the 2017 year strike did not cause much ruckus.
  • What trades could work as protection and seem positions to increase anyway given the market environment?

The possibility of a confrontation between an International coalition and Assad of Syria is increasing quickly. President Trump launched a few salvos on Twitter to set the tone; promising rockets to Assad.

Last year, when the U.S. bombed the Shayrat airport in response to Assad's inhumane transgressions, it gave advance warning to Russian troops. The U.S. carefully maneuvered around the Russians. This time that could be harder as Russia has anti-missile equipment installed in Syria. It seems highly likely an International coalition will strike in Syria and whether Russia will get more warning besides this tweet remains to be seen.

It seems like a high probability event warships from either the U.K, France, or the U.S. will fire long-range missiles on a range of military targets within Syria.

After the Shayrat strike in 2017, the S&P 500 (SPY) did not respond very much although oil traded up 2%+.


SPY data by YCharts


Brent Crude Oil Spot Price data by YCharts

President Trump also tweeted U.S.-Russian relations haven't been this bad since the cold war. From my observations as an outsider (I'm not a citizen of either country) that seems a bit of an overstatement. Even if it is not an overstatement, it isn't necessarily as big a problem as the cold war standoff. Russia is a major nuclear power but its economy is crippled and relatively the country is not as powerful compared to the cold war days.

Because of Russia's presence in the area, there is an undeniable chance the conflict escalates. A low probability event with potential high impact.

There are a few positioning responses that are worth thinking about:

  1. Decrease U.S. exposure
  2. Buy a few short-term puts
  3. Buy energy stocks or oil futures
  4. Buy or add gold

Decreasing U.S. exposure could be worthwhile. Although the 2017 strike didn't stop the market for very long, things can work out differently. Because of the advance warning the U.S. gave the Russians, the Syrians got off relatively scot-free and now they are repeating their past sins. It will hardly be a surprise if the coalition sends in hundreds of missiles without advanced warning.

Because Russian targets could easily become collateral damage, there's huge potential for the market to react with a strong sell-off.

Alternatively, you could short the S&P 500 against your positions to provide some coverage. Buying puts can work too if you can find a price you like.

The primary reason I suggest the security or "trade" is because the S&P 500 is already very highly valued with a CAPE ratio above that off Black Monday and Black Tuesday.

Energy traded up last year in response to the strikes. Countries may start hoarding more energy. Capacity can be taken offline as a result of strikes or counterstrikes. The reason I like energy is because it is one of the few industries with very undemanding multiples. In addition from a bottom-up perspective, it looks to me like energy stocks did not respond strongly to the appreciation of oil prices. Over the years, we have been building our energy exposure at The Black Swan Portfolio. This negative event could turn out to be a catalyst for a re-rate. Not to mention Saudi-Arabia's desire to reach $80 oil.


Brent Crude Oil Spot Price data by YCharts

Buy or add gold

It's something of a theme with this article. I'm not at all confident about "trades" in response to airstrikes. However, it seems obvious we are moving into a moment in time when there's the potential for tremendous volatility. Gold is another asset I already favor because of inflation-related considerations. It seems like an interesting trade to keep gold near the top end of the range I'm comfortable with. In The Black Swan Portfolio, we own it outright in the safe portfolio. In addition, we have exposure to certain gold royalty companies that would certainly benefit from higher gold prices as well. Easy ways to gain exposure to gold are through the SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) or the iShares Gold Trust (IAU).


A coalition airstrike seems like a high probability event. It seems to me positions short the S&P 500, long gold, and long energy (stocks and/or the commodity) could be quite interesting. Mostly because in my opinion these are good positions to have anyway and geopolitics could turn out to be catalysts. I'd like to add I'm not a big fan of a short Russia. For example, through VanEck Vectors Russia ETF (RSX) or the iShares MSCI Russia ETF (ERUS)

This article was written by

Bram de Haas profile picture
Professional risk-taker focused on smart bets and risk control.
15 years of investing and I feel like a rookie in his first year at the academy. My roots are in the value school but over time I've learned to respect different approaches. I'm interested in what quants do, options traders do, and even what WallStreetBets is doing (keep your friends close and...)

I gravitate towards special-situations. That means situations around companies or the market where the price can move in a certain direction based on a specific event or ongoing event. This eclectic and creative style of investing seems to suit my personality and interests most closely.

Since 2020 I host a podcast/videocast where I discuss (special-situation/event-driven) market events and investment ideas with top analysts, portfolio managers, hedge fund managers, experts, and other investment professionals. I highly recommend it (pick episodes around topics that interest you) for the amazing guests that come on with regularity.

I've been writing for Seeking Alpha since 2013 after playing p$ker (I'm not that immature but the real word gets censored) professionally. In 2018 I founded Starshot Capital B.V. A Dutch AIF manager. Follow me on Twitter @Bramdehaas or email me Dehaas.Bram at Gmail


Disclosure: I am/we are long IAU. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Recommended For You

Comments (57)

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.