The Relevance of a Footnote Disclosure in the Arris Financials
ARRIS International PLC (ARRS) makes reference to the patent infringement case in their financial statement footnotes. As of April 18, 2018, ARRIS had a market capitalization of more than$5 billion. The below snip is from page 36 of the ARRIS Form 10-K filed for December 31, 2017:
Under U.S. GAAP [see below], this means
 The probability of a negative outcome for Arris is reasonably possible, but the amount cannot be estimated,
 The probability of a negative outcome for Arris is reasonably possible, and the amount can be estimated, or
 The probability of a negative outcome for Arris is probable, but the amount cannot be estimated.
Merely Google contingent liability and footnote disclosure under U.S. GAAP to understand why the above disclosures were required for Arris:
Would the Impact to Arris be Significant or Material Enough to Impact the Stock?
Arris data from Seeking Alpha is provided in the below, 1 year chart:
With a $5.1 billion market capitalization, a $0.5 billion to $3 billion judgment against their customers, seeking indemnification, could have a significant or material and negative impact on the firm's stock price. [This is the range anticipated by those on the IHUB board for UnifiedOnline, Inc. (OTC:UOIP)]. It is, for this reason, that Arris disclosed the case in the footnotes to their financial statements. Recall, from the footnotes to the financials:
A List of the "Customers" Seeking Indemnification from Arris
A list of the 13 customers that may have sought indemnification from Arris follows. It is important to note that Arris is not "directly" involved or named in the ChanBond suit.
This is the "you sue me and I sue you" game that requires a conversation with an attorney to understand, but will make sense after you give careful though to the key word: "indemnification." Remember, if there was no significant or material risk, this matter would not have been disclosed in the footnotes to the Arris financial statements.
(1) WaveDivision Holdings, LLC., a private company,
(4) WideOpen West Finance, LLC., a private company,
(5) Cequel Communications, LLC., a private company,
(6) RCN Telecom Services ,LLC., a private company,
(7) Cox Communications, Inc.et al, a private company,
(8) Time Warner Cable Inc. et al [see CHTR, above],
(9) Mediacom Communications Corporation, a private company,
(10) Bright House Networks, LLC. [see CHTR, above],
(11) Cablevision Systems Corporation et al,
I like the risk/reward for UOIP, but do not like the risk reward for ARRS. This is just my humble opinion, but these patent lawsuits are scary and if Arris fails, they will have to "book" a potentially massive judgment in their income statement and balance sheet. They can, of course, appeal.
Disclosure: I am/we are long UOIP. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Editor's Note: This article covers one or more microcap stocks. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.