Biotechs Emerge Unscathed And Ready To Go!

by: Tarun Chandra, CFA

The blueprint to lower drug prices leaves biotechs unscathed and can be a net positive for the biopharma industry.

A big cloud has cleared and this will assist biotech valuations going forward particularly as the market firms up.

An improving investment climate matched with overarching industry trends can favor biotechs to record a sharp rise over the next few months.

A portfolio exposure to smallcap and midcap biotech stocks can be a prudent and rewarding strategy at this time. ~ Biotech Market Pulse

Biotech Pulse

Biotechs have a pulse now, and it's beginning to beat a little harder!

As President Trump on Friday, May 11, delivered a blueprint, American Patients First (APF), to lower drug prices the early indications appear to be that the biotech and pharmaceutical industries have jumped through the proverbial ring of fire with just a few singed hair.

In fact, the blueprint, in its present form, lifts a cloud of uncertainty over the biopharma sector and paves the way for sunnier days ahead, at least for the near-term.

The biotech stocks have been demonstrating strong resilience in the face of intense volatility since February and, remarkably, keeping pace with the broader indexes, considering the highly speculative and volatile nature of the group.

As of April 1, the S&P Biotechnology Index (XBI) was up +3% for the year, while the larger cap Nasdaq Biotechnology Index (IBB) was down -3%. The Prudent Biotech Portfolio was up +18% over the same period.

The further clarity in administration's strategy is favorable for the biopharma sentiment and can provide the momentum to join the incipient market rally. Investors may consider an exposure to the sector at least for the second quarter, as the third quarter may amplify the negative rhetoric around drug pricing as election posturing becomes louder.

American Patients First ~ Biotech Pharma - APF Blueprint

So far it appears the bark turned out to be worse than the bite.

The biggest fears heading into the blueprint announcement were:
(i) The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will acquire direct negotiating power to engage with pharmaceutical companies on pricing. Presently, negotiations with drugmakers are done by the insurance and pharmacy benefit management (PBM) companies, and as per the 2003 law, the CMS is prohibited from using its buying power to directly negotiate.

(ii) The administration would make it easier for prescription drugs to be imported from overseas, where same or similar medicines can be cheaper in certain cases

As New York Times reported prior to the blueprint release,

Asked if the plan would include direct negotiations by Medicare, the official said, “No, we are talking about something different...We are not calling for Medicare negotiation in the way that Democrats have called for. We clearly want to make important changes that will dramatically improve the way negotiation takes place inside the Medicare program.”

It was a collective sigh of relief for the biopharma industry when direct negotiations and imports were not included in the blueprint. Instead, the President did talk about giving the Medicare Part D new tools to negotiate for lower prices. Still, the industry lobbyists and the middlemen PBMs received a tongue lashing from the president, which was a small price to pay for a benign policy.

The 44-page blueprint highlighted by the President from his bully pulpit in the Rose Garden had four key points:

  • Increase competition from generics by prohibiting practices that keep them from reaching the market in a timely manner
  • Use the Trade Department to pressure trading partners to pay higher prices for US drugs
  • Lower patient out-of-pocket costs by bringing greater transparency no rebates negotiated by PBMs with drug makers and allowing pharmacists to guide patients to lower-cost alternatives
  • Provide new powers and tools to the CMM to work with PBMs and insurance companies in improving access to discounts and cheaper drugs ~ Drug Prices

Implications of APF for Biotechs

The biotech industry depends on its eventual high-valuation exit on the pharmaceutical industry, for they are the eventual buyers of the biotech product pipelines. So what's good for the pharma industry is often good for biotechs.

The APF in its present detail has turned out to be much better and gentler than expected, as the healthcare market was bracing for a worst-case scenario. In addition, the focus on seeking higher drug pricing from developed countries through the trade department will only increase export revenues for larger biotechs and pharmaceutical companies.

The biotech indexes responded by surging to their best performance in weeks, with the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index jumping nearly 3%. Even the PBMs, like Express Scripts (ESRX) and CVS Health (CVS), bounced nearly 3%.

The clarity from the blueprint provides a greater measure of confidence in stable industry dynamics and contributes towards a better healthcare investment climate.

Biotechs Attempting To Overcome Recent Bumps

Biotechs have recently struggled with some high-profile drug failures, that have dulled the investor sentiment.

Earlier this month, Merck published the results of its 2000 patient trial in the New England Journal of Medicine for its Verubecestat drug for treating Alzheimer's. The Phase II/III studies, that began in December 2012, and was stopped by Merck last year after an expert panel determined "virtually no chance of working," have revealed no improvement in cognition and function.

This was not just a failure of a single drug but the failure of a promising and much-pursued approach to treating Alzheimer's. The approach was predicated on the widely believed amyloid hypothesis that cutting off the supply of amyloid beta to the brain can reverse the progression of Alzheimer's. Drugs that would block the enzyme, known as BACE inhibitors, could then also prevent the buildup of the beta-amyloid, and thus slow or even reverse the progression of Alzheimer's. The results from the published study indicate that the damage in the brain may already be too extensive to be treated by any such class of amyloid inhibitor drugs, and the amyloid hypothesis may consequently be incorrect.

In April, it was the failure of a highly anticipated Phase III trial of a immuno-oncology combination of Incyte's (INCY) Epacadostat drug, an IDO protein inhibitor, with Merck's (MRK) blockbuster drug, Keytruda, a PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor, which cast a pall of gloom over the IDO sector in particular and biotechs in general.

However, biotechs have the benefit of the favorable overarching trends of rapidly evolving science, declining returns on internal pharma R&Ds, and growing M&A, as discussed in an earlier article Biotechs Well Placed. And with the market improving, these favorable factors cannot be dismissed. ~ Biotechs - TCell


As the stock market begins to steady itself, after a period of intense volatility, a favorable APF blueprint can provide the momentum to the biotech sector to rise above key technical levels and resume their uptrend.

Recently, we wrote an article about Small Caps being a bright spot in the volatile market with the potential to lead the market higher as the sentiment improves. The resilient strength in the small caps suggests a risk appetite for speculative investments. Many of the biotechs are in the small and midcap space, which has contributed meaningfully to the Prudent Biotech model portfolio gain of +18% as of April 1.

The biopharma sector has dodged a bullet for now. However, it's unmistakable that the lowering of prescription drug prices has broad appeal, and in the years ahead the pressure will continue. The prescription market remains on a long-term trajectory towards some form of price control in the future. With the November elections approaching, the price-gouging rhetoric will most likely rise after summer and more policy proposals will be offered, which may not be as benign, even though any change in key policies, like the CMS negotiating power, has to pass through Congress where it will face strong resistance.

Nonetheless, from an investment standpoint, we believe biotechs remain well-positioned now, and if the broader market remains favorable, there now exists a window of opportunity over the next few months to accumulate sharp gains in the biotech sector.

A few of the promising companies, mostly in the smallcap and midcap space with some part of our model portfolios now or in the past, include Agio Pharmaceuticals (AGIO), Sarepta Therapeutics (SRPT), Supernus Pharmaceuticals (SUPN), Immunomedics (IMMU), Loxo Oncology (LOXO), Heron Therapeutics, (HRTX), BeiGene (BGNE), G1 Therapeutics (GTHX), Crispr Therapeutics (CRSP), Mirati Therapeutics (MRTX), Adaptimmune Therapeutics (ADAP), Arena Pharmaceuticals (ARNA), Endocyte (ECYT), Ironwood Pharma (IRWD), Uniqure (QURE), Dynavax (DVAX), Atara Biotherapeutics (ATRA), and Catalyst Biosciences (CBIO).

Author's note: As always, kindly do your own due diligence. The smallcap and biotech sector carry more risk of losses than the broader market. For additional information and helpful links, please check the Profile by clicking on the name above. Also, you can consider clicking the orange Follow button to receive such information immediately when published. Please feel free to add to this commentary or point out errors in the Comments section. Opinions can change with time and additional data. More details about our exposure to the names mentioned herein are in the disclosure below.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: Graycell Advisors or Prudent Biotech is not a registered investment advisor (RIA) and publishes quantitative-driven model portfolios for investors and RIAs. More can be learned from Some or all of the companies/stocks mentioned in the article may be in the past, now, or in the future, be part of the various model portfolios for subscribers. In addition, although there are no personal positions presently, stocks mentioned can be part of portfolios of family and associates. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. The information here is only provided for a general informational purpose and not as a recommendation, and is not guaranteed to be complete or accurate. Companies mentioned here may not be favored in the future as market trend changes and/or new information emerges, and no portfolio updates will be provided unless you are a model portfolio subscriber. Opinions, where expressed, can change with time and new information.

Editor's Note: This article covers one or more microcap stocks. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.