The Chemist's Quality CEF Report - May 2018

|
Includes: ACP, AIF, ARDC, BGH, BGX, BQH, BWG, EHI, EIO, EMJ, EVJ, EVP, FPF, FT, HIX, HNW, HPF, HPI, HPS, HYB, IVH, KIO, MFL, MIY, MMV, MNE, MVF, MVT, NAZ, NBW, NHS, NNC, NPN, NQP, NUM, NUO, PDI, PDT, PHT, TPZ
by: Stanford Chemist
Summary

Only funds with coverage >100% are considered!

Top lists of discount, yield, D x Y and D x Y x Z are given.

Some high-yield quality fund picks are suggested.

For the inaugural issue of The Chemist's Quality CEF Report (September 2017), describing the background and rationale of the Report, please click here. Data were taken from the close of May 16, 2018.

The Chemist's Quality CEF Report is a monthly feature. Previous editions of the Report can be searched using the keyword "cefrep."

What does the "Quality" indicate? Simply put, it means that the distribution coverage is greater than 100%. However, please note these caveats: Firstly, coverage ratios are calculated using earnings data from CEFConnect. No efforts have been made to independently verify the coverage ratios from the individual fund annual/semi-annual reports themselves. Secondly, having a coverage ratio >100% does not guarantee that the fund's distribution is secure. Many funds reduce their distributions periodically in line with market conditions in order to maintain good coverage. Thirdly, a coverage cut-off ratio of 100% is, ultimately, an arbitrary number. A fund with 99.9% coverage will be excluded from the rankings, whereas funds with 100.1% coverage will be considered, even though only a sliver of coverage separates the two.

I hope that these rankings of quality CEFs will provide fertile grounds for further exploration.

Key to table headings:

P/D = premium/discount

Z = 1-year z-score

Dis = distance

Lev = leverage

BE = baseline expense

Cov = coverage

1. Top 10 highest Quality discounts

The following data show the 10 CEFs with the highest discounts and coverage >100%. Yields, z-scores and leverage are shown for comparison.

CEF

Category

P/D

Yield

Z

Lev

BE

Cov

(EVJ)

Tax-Free Income-New Jersey

-16.6%

4.9%

-1.8

38%

1.54%

106%

(NUM)

Tax-Free Income-Michigan

-15.6%

4.3%

-1.7

38%

1.00%

108%

(NQP)

Tax-Free Income-Pennsylvania

-15.5%

5.2%

-1.9

41%

0.95%

103%

(MNE)

Tax-Free Income-New York

-15.2%

3.8%

-2.2

38%

1.23%

109%

(BQH)

Tax-Free Income-New York

-15.2%

4.2%

-2.0

39%

1.37%

109%

(NBW)

Tax-Free Income-California

-15.1%

4.2%

-2.2

41%

1.28%

109%

(NNC)

Tax-Free Income-North Carolina

-15.0%

3.9%

-1.9

39%

1.04%

105%

(MMV)

Tax-Free Income-Massachusetts

-15.0%

3.8%

-1.9

33%

1.27%

113%

(EMJ)

Tax-Free Income-New Jersey

-14.8%

5.0%

-1.3

39%

1.29%

102%

(NUO)

Tax-Free Income-Ohio

-14.8%

4.3%

-1.8

39%

1.06%

105%

https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2018/5/16/49181399-15264757192580361.png

(Source: CEFConnect, Stanford Chemist)

2. Top 10 lowest z-scores

CEFs with the lowest z-scores are potential buy candidates. The following data show the 10 CEFs with the lowest z-scores. Premium/discount, yields and leverage are shown for comparison. Only funds with coverage >100% are considered.

CEF

Category

Z

P/D

Yield

Lev

BE

Cov

(NAZ)

Tax-Free Income-Arizona

-2.9

-8.9%

4.2%

37%

1.02%

105%

(MIY)

Tax-Free Income-Pennsylvania

-2.5

-5.2%

3.7%

4%

0.88%

102%

(NPN)

Tax-Free Income-Michigan

-2.5

-13.3%

5.3%

39%

0.87%

100%

(EVP)

Tax-Free Income-National

-2.4

-5.6%

5.5%

38%

0.91%

106%

(FPF)

Taxable Income-Preferreds

-2.4

-7.1%

7.8%

30%

1.31%

109%

(MVT)

Tax-Free Income-Pennsylvania

-2.4

-14.8%

4.5%

37%

1.67%

113%

(MVF)

Tax-Free Income-National

-2.3

-7.5%

5.7%

38%

0.90%

106%

(NBW)

Tax-Free Income-National

-2.2

-10.1%

5.3%

41%

1.03%

107%

(MFL)

Tax-Free Income-California

-2.2

-15.1%

4.2%

41%

1.28%

109%

(MNE)

Taxable Income-Multi-Sector

-2.2

-14.3%

5.8%

23%

1.12%

103%

https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2018/5/16/49181399-1526475719519906.png

(Source: CEFConnect, Stanford Chemist)

3. Top 20 highest Quality yields

Some readers are mostly interested in obtaining income from their CEFs, so the following data presents the top 20 highest yielding CEFs. I've also included the premium/discount and z-score data for reference. Before going out and buying all 10 funds from the list, some words of caution: [i] higher yields generally indicate higher risk, and [ii] some of these funds trade at a premium, meaning you will be buying them at a price higher than the intrinsic value of the assets (which is why I've included the premium/discount and z-score data for consideration). Only funds with coverage >100% are considered. To make the charts more manageable I've split the funds into two groups of 10.

CEF

Category

Yield

P/D

Z

Lev

BE

Cov

(ACP)

Taxable Income-Senior Loan

10.2%

-7.9%

-0.8

30%

2.24%

103%

(BGH)

Taxable Income-High Yield

9.5%

-9.1%

-1.1

26%

1.62%

108%

(KIO)

Taxable Income-High Yield

9.4%

-8.2%

-0.4

30%

1.96%

102%

(PDI)

Taxable Income-Multi-Sector

8.7%

5.7%

0.1

45%

2.15%

117%

(IVH)

Taxable Income-High Yield

8.5%

-11.2%

-1.5

32%

1.59%

129%

(HIX)

Taxable Income-High Yield

8.4%

-11.3%

-1.3

26%

1.17%

108%

(HPF)

Taxable Income-Preferreds

8.3%

-2.1%

-1.1

34%

1.25%

100%

(PHT)

Taxable Income-High Yield

8.2%

-9.4%

-0.4

29%

0.99%

108%

(HPS)

Taxable Income-Preferreds

8.2%

-2.7%

-0.4

33%

1.23%

102%

(HPI)

Taxable Income-Preferreds

8.1%

-0.8%

-0.8

34%

1.24%

101%

(EHI)

Non-US/Other-Global Income

7.9%

-12.9%

-1.9

25%

1.25%

102%

(ARDC)

US Equity-Growth & Income

7.8%

-8.6%

-0.5

24%

1.55%

105%

(TPZ)

Taxable Income-Senior Loan

7.8%

-7.7%

1.4

29%

1.97%

109%

(FPF)

Taxable Income-Preferreds

7.8%

-7.1%

-2.4

30%

1.31%

109%

(HNW)

Taxable Income-High Yield

7.7%

-12.8%

-1.8

31%

1.49%

107%

(PDT)

Taxable Income-Preferreds

7.7%

5.4%

-0.5

33%

1.44%

103%

(AIF)

Taxable Income-High Yield

7.6%

-9.7%

-0.6

35%

2.29%

105%

(BWG)

Non-US/Other-Global Income

7.5%

-14.0%

-1.1

37%

1.57%

105%

(HYB)

Taxable Income-High Yield

7.5%

-10.8%

-1.0

27%

1.14%

105%

(BGX)

Taxable Income-Senior Loan

7.5%

-4.7%

1.4

36%

1.73%

111%

https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2018/5/16/49181399-15264757198135855.png

https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2018/5/16/49181399-1526475720745709.png

(Source: CEFConnect, Stanford Chemist)

4. Top 10 best combination of quality yield and discount

For possible buy candidates, it is probably a good idea to consider both yield and discount. Buying a CEF with both a high yield and discount not only gives you the opportunity to capitalize from discount contraction, but you also get "free" alpha every time the distribution is paid out. This is because paying out a distribution is effectively the same as liquidating the fund at NAV and returning the capital to the unitholders. I considered several ways to rank CEFs by a composite metric of both yield and discount. The simplest would be yield + discount; however, I disregarded this because yields and discounts may have different ranges of absolute values and a sum would be biased towards the larger set of values. I finally settled on the multiplicative product, yield x discount. This is because I consider a CEF with 7% yield and 7% discount to be more desirable than a fund with 2% yield and 12% discount, or 12% yield and 2% discount, even though each pair of quantities sum to 14%. Multiplying yield and discount together biases towards funds with both high yield and discount. Since discount is negative and yield is positive, the more negative the "D x Y" metric, the better. Only funds with >100% coverage are considered.

CEF

Category

P/D

Yield

Z

D x Y

Lev

BE

Cov

(BWG)

Non-US/Other-Global Income

-14.0%

7.5%

-1.1

-1.1

37%

1.57%

105%

(EHI)

Non-US/Other-Global Income

-12.9%

7.9%

-1.9

-1.0

25%

1.25%

102%

(HNW)

Taxable Income-High Yield

-12.8%

7.7%

-1.8

-1.0

31%

1.49%

107%

(NHS)

Taxable Income-High Yield

-13.5%

7.2%

-1.7

-1.0

32%

1.24%

115%

(IVH)

Taxable Income-High Yield

-11.2%

8.5%

-1.5

-1.0

32%

1.59%

129%

(HIX)

Taxable Income-High Yield

-11.3%

8.4%

-1.3

-0.9

26%

1.17%

108%

(BGH)

Taxable Income-High Yield

-9.1%

9.5%

-1.1

-0.9

26%

1.62%

108%

(FT)

Taxable Income-Multi-Sector

-14.3%

5.8%

-2.2

-0.8

23%

1.12%

103%

(EVJ)

Tax-Free Income-New Jersey

-16.6%

4.9%

-1.8

-0.8

38%

1.54%

106%

(HYB)

Taxable Income-High Yield

-10.8%

7.5%

-1.0

-0.8

27%

1.14%

105%

https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2018/5/16/49181399-1526475720786316.png

(Source: CEFConnect, Stanford Chemist)

5. Top 10 best combination of quality yield, discount and z-score

This is my favorite metric because it takes into account all three factors that I always consider when buying or selling CEFs: yield, discount and z-score. The composite metric simply multiplies the three quantities together. A screen is applied to only include CEFs with a negative 1-year z-score. As both discount and z-score are negative while yield is positive, the more positive the "D x Y x Z" metric, the better. Only funds with >100% coverage are considered.

CEF

Category

P/D

Yield

Z

D x Y x Z

Lev

BE

Cov

(EHI)

Non-US/Other-Global Income

-12.9%

7.9%

-1.9

1.9

25%

1.25%

102%

(FT)

Taxable Income-Multi-Sector

-14.3%

5.8%

-2.2

1.8

23%

1.12%

103%

(HNW)

Taxable Income-High Yield

-12.8%

7.7%

-1.8

1.8

31%

1.49%

107%

(MIY)

Tax-Free Income-Michigan

-13.3%

5.3%

-2.5

1.7

39%

0.88%

100%

(NHS)

Taxable Income-High Yield

-13.5%

7.2%

-1.7

1.6

32%

1.24%

115%

(EVP)

Tax-Free Income-Pennsylvania

-14.8%

4.5%

-2.4

1.6

37%

1.67%

113%

(NQP)

Tax-Free Income-Pennsylvania

-15.5%

5.2%

-1.9

1.5

41%

0.95%

103%

(EIO)

Tax-Free Income-Ohio

-14.1%

4.9%

-2.2

1.5

35%

1.27%

104%

(EVJ)

Tax-Free Income-New Jersey

-16.6%

4.9%

-1.8

1.5

38%

1.54%

106%

(IVH)

Taxable Income-High Yield

-11.2%

8.5%

-1.5

1.4

32%

1.59%

129%

https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2018/5/16/49181399-15264757207604065.png

(Source: CEFConnect, Stanford Chemist)

Disclosure: I am/we are long THE PORTFOLIO SECURITIES. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.