Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

Emerging Markets Face Multiple Tantrums

Jul. 03, 2018 9:59 AM ETEEM, VWO, IEMG, EDC, SCHE, EDZ, EMF, MSF, ADRE, EEV, EUM, EET, SPEM, EEME, XSOE, DBEM, FEM, HEEM, EWEM, ROAM, ESGE, EDBI, EMLB, DIEM, KALL, EMSA, KLEM, RFEM, EMEM, MFEM, PPEM-OLD1 Comment
Otaviano Canuto profile picture
Otaviano Canuto
496 Followers

Summary

  • The addition of a fourth US rate rise to the Fed's 2018 dot-plot graph after the June meeting of the FOMC sparked a new bout of portfolio outflows from EM.
  • Emerging markets have faced "political" and "trade tantrums" in addition to the "dollar tantrum".
  • Portfolio rebalancing and exchange rate realignment tend to worsen the growth-inflation trade-off in emerging markets.

The addition of a fourth US rate rise to the Federal Reserve's 2018 dot-plot graph after the June meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee sparked a bout of portfolio outflows from emerging markets. This followed a fleeting upswing at the beginning of the month that fell short on reversing the unwinding of exposure and sell-off of assets in May (Chart 1). Country differentiation has been accentuated, with exchange rate devaluation pressures and capital outflows occurring more notably in economies exhibiting higher vulnerability to sudden stops in foreign finance.

Since April, I can single out at least three different factors that have led to sudden bursts of fears among investors of losses in portfolios in individual emerging markets. First, there is the 'dollar tantrum'. Argentina and Turkey were the two major cases of a rout in May, and they entered the current phase of rising US Treasury yields and dollar values sharing weaknesses. Their current account deficits had deteriorated substantially in the recent past. Since the 2013 'taper tantrum', Argentina's current account deficit has jumped to levels comparable to those of the then 'fragile five' (Brazil, India, Indonesia, South Africa, and Turkey), while Turkey was the only one among the five countries to have remained there. In both cases, inflows of foreign direct investment fall significantly short of covering the gap in the basic balance of payments. Because of structural current account deficits that are not financed by FDI but rather by hot capital inflows, both countries have featured low levels of reserve adequacy.

Another common feature they share is that their dollar-denominated debt as a share of GDP makes them more fragile in the light of the dollar's strength over recent months, while corresponding debtors in both economies do not have a 'natural hedge' in terms of dollar revenues. Ultimately, currency mismatches on dollar-denominated

This article was written by

Otaviano Canuto profile picture
496 Followers
Otaviano Canuto, based in Washington, D.C area, is a senior fellow at the Policy Center for the New South, professor at George Washington University, principal of the Center for Macroeconomics and Development and a non-resident senior fellow at Brookings Institution. He is a former vice-president and a former executive director at the World Bank, a former executive director at the International Monetary Fund and a former vice-president at the Inter-American Development Bank. He is also a former deputy minister for international affairs at Brazil’s Ministry of Finance and a former professor of economics at University of São Paulo and University of Campinas, Brazil.He has authored and co-edited 8 books and over 160 book chapters and academic articles, and is a frequent contributor to numerous blogs and periodicals.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.