If You Are Looking For Value Stocks, Try China

Sep. 11, 2018 8:24 AM ETSPY, FXI, QQQ, GXG, ARGT, EZA, TUR, INDA, EEM8 Comments3 Likes
Nelson Alves profile picture
Nelson Alves
2.09K Followers

Summary

  • QE money returning home is mainly responsible for the fragile economies' massacre.
  • The trade war seems to be the catalyst for the disorderly return, and the movement seems blind to fundamentals.
  • China should be resilient through the increased focus on its internal market.
  • If a hard-landing fails to materialize, value should be easily found among Chinese stocks.

According to the Bloomberg, the S&P 500 (SPY) is trading at 21 times earnings and returned 20.85% in the last 12 months.

Snapshot 1 – S&P 500

(Source: Bloomberg)

Snapshot 2 – SSE 50

According to the same publication, the SSE 50 is trading at 9 times earnings and returned -6.49% during the last 12 months.

(Source: Bloomberg)

Probably, this makes a pretty good opening case in favor of Chinese stocks. However, first, we need to understand what is happening.

Why Is China Decoupling From Developed Markets?

We might formulate the following reasoning: the trade war is leading to weakness in the most vulnerable economies. Countries with current account and budget deficits, together with shallow depth external reserves, are more likely to suffer from the shock waves of the trade war.

Imagine we were entering the year 2017. Looking at the following tables, which countries do you think would be more likely to have a currency crisis?

Table 1 – Short-term debt (% of total Reserves)

(Source: World Bank)

Table 2 – Total reserves (% of total external debt)

Machine generated alternative text: Total reserves (h af total external debo 14.7 41.7 33.2 27.9 256.8 2016 20.2 38.4 32.3 70.1 26.1 216.7 2017 Argentina Colombia South Africa South Asia Turkey China 2014 21.6 34.7 63.6 31.7 220.3 2015

(Source: World Bank)

Remember that reserves are mainly influenced by trade, remittances and loans. For instance, countries can improve their reserves by being net exporters, receiving remittances from emigrants or taking loans. However, taking loans is only a temporary measure and might even produce a debt crisis near maturity, if the roll-over is unlikely.

Since governments don't usually want their citizens fleeing the country, incentivizing emigration to build a steady flow of foreign currency is not a viable long-term policy. Therefore, we might assume that countries with balanced budgets and net exporters are the ones who should be able to grow their currency reserves steadily.

Theoretically, countries under the current flexible foreign exchange system shouldn't need reserves. However, evidence has made it clear that countries with high levels of reserves have been less subject to crisis impact.

Looking at table 1 and table 2, we can easily see which countries are being molested during the current currency crisis. Argentina, Turkey and South Africa have low ratios of total reserves to external debt, and very high ratios of short-term debt to total reserves, meaning that they are debt-ridden economies, showing signs of solvency issues in the short term. The trade war and higher interest rates in the US, happening simultaneously, were the catalysts to deploy the bomb.

Emerging markets are suffering the contagion from the panic in countries like Argentina, South Africa and Turkey.

Graph1 – YTD comparison between S&P 500, SSE Index, MSCI Argentina, MSCI Colombia, MSCI South Africa

(Source: Yahoo Finance)

As you can see in Graph 1, China was completely caught in the Emerging Markets drama. During the last 8 months, the Chinese SSE Index has underperformed the S&P 500 by more than 26%. This is huge and, probably, overdone. For instance, Colombia performed much better.

Is The Chinese Decoupling Warranted?

Yes and no.

The US over-performance over the rest of the world is a reminiscence from the quantitative easing days. Back in 2008 and 2009, a great part of the QE money went straight to emerging markets, helping fuel a bull run there. And, at the time it had a big impact in the fragile five countries (Brazil, India, Indonesia, Turkey and South Africa). Now that the money is being recalled, the dollar is getting stronger, part is going to US equities, while currencies and stocks in emerging markets are suffering.

We can speculate that part of this movement is blind to fundamentals, and we are just watching a herding effect. For bold and thoughtful investors, this is great news. That means good and bad fundamental emerging economies are getting cheaper alike. Investors will be well rewarded just for separating the wheat from the chaff.

Obviously, we run the risk of everything going astray. Moreover, the stabilization of the current macroeconomic situation might call for a dovish stance from the Fed. In previous times, it would be possible to get the EU, USA and China to agree on Central Bank measures to alleviate the situation, but presently that is unlikely.

Therefore, we cannot ignore the dark clouds on the horizon. We might have to see this through and face contagion at a global level. The fragile economies might be shut down from the global financial system, banks in developed economies might face losses, credit may contract and a recession emerges in the developed markets.

Another interesting problem might be the reemergence of inflation due to the tariff war. Part of imports are intermediate products used for developed countries' exports; this means that tariffs might bring an inflationary outbreak. If credit contraction and inflation happen at the same time, we are in for some interesting times.

Working Hypothesis: China Will Step In The Global Scene

A possible scenario is China pursuing closer ties with the EU, Russia and other emerging markets. China already has a global policy for the world stage. The One Road, One Belt initiative is one good example of that. We should expect the acceleration of these type of initiatives. That could tackle two goals at the same time. Helping emerging countries now will make China the favored partner, in detriment of the traditional US role. And, getting closer trading ties might mitigate the potential inflationary pressures stemming from tariffs.

Additionally, China has been decreasing its dependence on international trade, while developing its internal market.

Table 3 – China trade as % of GDP

(Source: World Bank)

Table 4 – China private consumption as % GDP

(Source: World Bank)

All-in-all, it is likely that China will step-up into the international stage and use some of its reserves dry powder to mitigate the current currency crisis. If that happens, we will see the trend reinforce towards a bigger Chinese internal market. Which in turn means that Chinese companies, especially the ones exposed to the consumer market, are poised to thrive. Given the fact that Chinese companies are trading at a discount relative to the US markets, thoughtful investors searching for value might want to start looking for places in China to apply their appreciated US dollars.

Presently, going long the Chinese stock market seems like a smart move, but nonetheless, just don't forget that it will be a turbulent ride in the short term.

This article was written by

Nelson Alves profile picture
2.09K Followers
Nelson Alves is a professional investor, established in Portugal. He started his career in 2007 right at the start of the biggest financial crisis since 1929. Until 2011 he worked in several trading desks. His main influences are Philip Fisher and Warren Buffet. Nelson is looking to help small investors on the task of preserving and increasing their savings’ funds. Being a thoroughly student of several investment approaches, he believes that the equity markets should be on service of both small and institutional investors, and therefore every citizen should be able to reclaim his fair share of the long-term growing prosperity around the world. http://pt.linkedin.com/in/nelsonmjalves/
Follow

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.