Here are some things I think I am thinking about.
1) Has Mr. Market Finally Lost His Mind? It seems that everyone is losing their mind over politics, so I've been rather amazed that the financial market has held it together this long. That changed a bit in October as the MSCI All World Stock Index took a 12% dive.
Now, what's interesting about the stock market downturn is that the wheels have been in motion here for almost all of 2018. The MSCI All World Index, the only true measure of "the stock market", peaked in January. While US stocks continued higher, the total world has done rather poorly all year long. So, this isn't really all that new if you've been paying attention.
But has the market lost its mind, and will it get crazier? Well, no one knows for sure, but there's a strong argument to be made that the market had lost its mind for 8 years. After all, bear markets are born in bull markets. The way I like to see things, the stock market is an instrument that pays about 7-8% per year in nominal terms and can't mathematically pay out much more than that over the very long term. That is, after all, approximately the rate of corporate profits. So, when you go through these long periods of multiple expansion and 10%+ returns, you have to wonder - "When is Mr. Market going to give back some of that excess return?" Said differently, a little smoothing in stock market returns in the coming years isn't really a bad thing. It's actually Mr. Market adjusting for what had been a period of very high, unsustainable returns.
2) Wait a Second, Should we be Begging for a Bear Market? Speaking of bear markets, I posted this chart on Twitter and some people lost their minds over it. What it's showing is somewhat theoretical, but also practical. Basically, when the stock market falls, it generally results in multiple compression and higher expected future returns. So, let's say you have two investors who earn a 7% annualized return over time, but one investor experiences a big bear market and continues to invest through the bear market when multiples compress. Strangely, that investor does better in the long term because they invest more money into a higher-return generating asset class during the bear market, while the other investor invests into an expensive but steady market.
In fairness, we're assuming that the bear market bounces back with higher expected future returns, but you get the basic point. In essence, for the long-term investor, they should be begging for a bear market where they can invest more money at more attractive prices. This is especially true of the young, low-income generating investor who will be able to invest more of a higher future income into the market into a potential bear market.
The flip side of this is that most of us aren't super-long term investors. Most of us are something middle-of-the-road. So, maybe all those people who lost their minds on Twitter over this have a good point. And that's what makes all of this so hard - we need to think more long term, but our liabilities are mostly short term. The key is finding that right balance where you can maintain a strategy that is intelligently long term, but not irrationally long term.
3) The Wall Street Math Hustle. I won't say much about this article other than it's fantastic and you should read it. It gets into a lot of the stuff I talk about here regularly: how chasing market-beating returns is bad; how paying high fees is bad; how most of what Wall Street sells is the illusion of sophistication and the guarantee of high fees in exchange for the hope of market-beating returns. You'll love this piece, especially if you're into bashing nerdy financial types.1
I don't like bashing my own industry, but I believe there's a better way to offer financial advice and investment management without the high fees and salesmanship about market-beating returns.
1 Wait a second here - I am a nerdy financial type... uh oh.