By Catherine Stienstra, Head of Municipal Investments
Traditional muni indices are concentrated in higher quality bonds and may have more interest-rate risk.
Passive products that track traditional municipal bond benchmarks may give investors excessive exposure to duration (interest-rate) risk, because of the way traditional indices are constructed.
Problem: Traditional indices have a quality bias
Municipal bonds have long been viewed as high-quality assets, partly because the majority of them historically carried a AAA rating. Until 2008, monoline insurance was prevalent, enhanced the credit rating of a bond and provided additional protection to investors in the case of default. However, the 2008 financial crisis caused insurers to lose their coveted AAA ratings and resulted in municipal bonds trading based not on the insurance, but on their underlying creditworthiness. Nearly 70% of the municipal market was rated AAA prior to the financial crisis. Less than 20% is today.1
Even with this change, the majority of the muni market is still rated investment grade, and many municipal indices have been designed to focus exclusively on these higher quality bonds.
Opportunity: Lower quality sectors may enhance yield with lower interest rate sensitivity
The ratings recalibration ultimately created a tremendous opportunity for municipal investors. The market now differentiates among issuers based on fundamentals and applies a risk premium reflective of their sector, creditworthiness and idiosyncratic factors. This results in investors earning more yield than when the bonds were insured and rated AAA. This yield advantage also helps buffer interest-rate volatility.
We use a metric called empirical duration to more accurately measure a bond's sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Investors often focus on effective duration - a theoretical measure of interest-rate sensitivity based primarily on the maturity of the bond. But empirical duration uses real historical price changes to show the true sensitivity of a bond to changes in interest rates. As a general rule, true interest rate sensitivity tends to fall - and the gap between effective and empirical duration increases - as you move down the credit quality spectrum. As lower rated investment-grade and high-yield municipal bonds generally have lower empirical durations relative to their higher quality counterparts, investors are taking on less interest-rate risk when allocating to these sectors. Credit risk may matter more. Because interest-rate risk and credit risk are relatively uncorrelated, introducing the latter into an otherwise high-quality portfolio can provide important diversification benefits.
Tracking a traditional municipal bond benchmark may leave investors overexposed to higher quality bonds and, consequently, subject to excess interest-rate risk. A strategic municipal bond approach, with a focus on diversification and the flexibility to navigate interest-rate risk and credit risk, may help address this challenge.
1 Source: Bloomberg, as of 04/30/18.
Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss.
There are risks associated with fixed-income investments, including credit risk, interest rate risk, and prepayment and extension risk. In general, bond prices rise when interest rates fall and vice versa. This effect is usually more pronounced for longer term securities. Municipal securities may be affected by tax, legislative, regulatory, demographic or political changes, as well as changes impacting a state's financial, economic or other conditions.
© 2018 Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC. All rights reserved.
With respect to mutual funds, ETFs and Tri-Continental Corporation, investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of a fund carefully before investing. To learn more about this and other important information about each fund, download a free prospectus or visit columbiathreadneedleetf.com. The prospectus should be read carefully before investing.
Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund carefully before investing. To obtain the Fund's most recent periodic reports and other regulatory filings, contact your financial advisor or download reports here. These reports and other filings can also be found on the Securities and Exchange Commission's EDGAR Database. You should read these reports and other filings carefully before investing.
The views expressed are as of the date given, may change as market or other conditions change and may differ from views expressed by other Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC (CMIA) associates or affiliates. Actual investments or investment decisions made by CMIA and its affiliates, whether for its own account or on behalf of clients, may not necessarily reflect the views expressed. This information is not intended to provide investment advice and does not take into consideration individual investor circumstances. Investment decisions should always be made based on an investor's specific financial needs, objectives, goals, time horizon and risk tolerance. Asset classes described may not be suitable for all investors. Past performance does not guarantee future results, and no forecast should be considered a guarantee either. Since economic and market conditions change frequently, there can be no assurance that the trends described here will continue or that any forecasts are accurate.
Columbia Funds and Columbia Acorn Funds are distributed by Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc., member FINRA. Columbia Funds are managed by Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC and Columbia Acorn Funds are managed by Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC, a subsidiary of Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC.
Columbia Threadneedle Investments is the global brand name of the Columbia and Threadneedle group of companies.
NOT FDIC INSURED · No Bank Guarantee · May Lose Value