Performance Of Factor Tilts: November 2018
- In an ongoing series, I have illustrated for Seeking Alpha readers how five unique factor tilts have generated market-beating performance historically.
- I hope a display of these returns and a brief discussion about why these factor tilts deviated from the broader market can help readers with their asset allocation decisions.
- Low volatility and dividend growth continued their recent outperformance in November.
- Size and value continued to lag in the broad-based market sell-off.
- Hopefully, with this series, we can all get smarter about smart beta.
In a series of articles, I have tried my best to show Seeking Alpha readers that these simple strategies outperform over the longest datasets we have available in U.S. finance. With this monthly update, I try and provide insight into the short-term drivers of relative performance.
- Size: In Smart Beta Over Generations: Size, I showed that smaller capitalization firms have delivered higher returns since 1926, and that a qualitative sort like low volatility has boosted risk-adjusted returns over recent decades.
- Value: In The Value of Value, I showed that a value sort based on book-to-market has also delivered meaningful outperformance since 1926.
- Low Volatility: I offered an expansive series on Low Volatility beginning in July 2015, showing that it has outperformed across geographies, asset classes, and time horizons. In Smart Beta Over Generations: Low Volatility, I showed that across size cohorts, the lowest volatility quintile has produced higher absolute and risk-adjusted returns versus the riskiest two quintiles since 1963.
- Dividend Growth: In The Updated Chart All Dividend Investors Should See, I showed that dividend-paying stocks have outperformed since 1926, but that the stocks with the highest dividend yields tend to underperform companies that pay more stable dividends.
- Equal-Weighting: In Very Long-Run Excess Returns From Equal-Weighting, I show the long-run benefits of an equal-weighted strategy versus traditional capitalization-weighting. Equal-weighting benefits from both an smaller average capitalization level (size) and contrarian rebalancing (value).
This series uses different datasets that are more readily investable and have exchange-traded funds that replicate the benchmarks. The drawback is that these benchmarks date to 1989 at the earliest and many of the replicating funds have been around for less than a decade. As you can see from these indices though, the outperformance of these strategies versus the market benchmark is demonstrable over the past 10 and 20 years.
As mentioned previously, these indices are more investable than the longer academic datasets, but you still cannot invest directly in the underlying indices. Below I have listed the performance of exchange-traded funds that replicate these factor indices. Given the more recent inception dates of these funds, we do not have the full histories that we have for the underlying indices above, which is why I will show both in this series. These are certainly not the only ways to get exposure to these factors, and increasing competition in the realm of smart beta is likely to push down expense ratios in the industry going forward.
For these five factors and the S&P 500, I have also calculated the standard deviation of monthly returns. In this series, I am using this volatility measure as a risk proxy. While some buy-and-hold investors may counter that they have a long-term view and are not impacted by market volatility, unfortunately, many individual investors all too often can be whipsawed by market swings. Some investors may prefer strategies with less variability of returns like low volatility and dividend growth. We will also track this measure to ensure that these strategies are delivering on their promise of a smoother return profile.
Discussion Of Recent Performance
While equity markets rebounded in the last week of November to finish with positive returns, the S&P 500 (SPY) still finished behind the defensive Dividend Aristocrats (NOBL), (SDY) and Low Volatility (NYSEARCA:SPLV) stocks. (This monthly performance is visible in the first row of the first table in this article). Size (IJR) and Value (RPV) lagged in November, but still managed positive returns. Equal-weighting outperformed capitalization-weighting in part driven by the recent underperformance of the megacaps.
Low volatility and dividend growth have delivered on their historic defensiveness in risk-off environments. Over the last year, those two strategies have delivered higher risk-adjusted returns with lower variability of returns. The size factor, which delivered very strong returns over the first half of the year, saw a modest bounceback in November after its worst two month stretch since the market bottomed in 2009. The size factor has still delivered the worst absolute and risk-adjusted returns over the second half of 2018.
With the defensive sector grabbing the market leadership from momentum and growth, where do we go from here? It depends on your view of the business cycle. The stylized depiction below suggests where various factor tilts should outperform over the course of a business cycle.
Low volatility (SPLV) (USMV) and dividend growth (NOBL) (SDY) are best during the late cycle period, offering lower drawdowns during recessionary periods. Value (RPV), size (IJR), and equal weighting (RSP) - a value cousin - are best in the early recovery phase after these stocks have corrected during the contractionary phase. Momentum (MTUM) is more of a mid-cycle phenomenon.
How do we know where we are in the business cycle? That is the trillion-dollar question, and one that makes markets. Each of the five factor tilts produced both absolute and risk-adjusted outperformance over the long datasets described at the beginning of the article. Your portfolio construction should reflect your view of the business cycle, risk tolerance, and investment horizon.
Disclaimer: My articles may contain statements and projections that are forward-looking in nature, and therefore, inherently subject to numerous risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. While my articles focus on generating long-term risk-adjusted returns, investment decisions necessarily involve the risk of loss of principal. Individual investor circumstances vary significantly, and information gleaned from my articles should be applied to your own unique investment situation, objectives, risk tolerance, and investment horizon.
This article was written by
Analyst’s Disclosure: I am/we are long IJR, PRV, SPLV, USMV, SDY, NOBL, RSP, MTUM. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.